基于多种方法评价巢湖流域水体中PAHs的生态风险
Using Multiple Methods to Assess the Ecological Risk of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Waters from Chaohu Lake Watershed
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2021.113063, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王继忠*:广电计量检测(合肥)股份有限公司,安徽 合肥;安徽建筑大学能源与环境工程学院,安徽 合肥;张 浏:安徽环境科学研究院,安徽 合肥;谢发之:安徽建筑大学材料与化学工程学院,安徽 合肥;朱曙光:安徽建筑大学能源与环境工程学院,安徽 合肥;彭书传:合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,安徽 合肥
关键词: 多环芳烃生态风险商值法物种敏感性分布模型概率风险评价法Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Ecological Risk Risk Quotients (RQ) Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) Probability Risk Assessment (PRA)
摘要: 为了客观评价多环芳烃(PAHs)对水生生态系统的影响,应用了商值法(risk quotients, RQ)、物种敏感性分布模型(sensitivity species distribution, SSD)和概率风险评价法(probabilistic risk assessment, PRA)分别评价了巢湖流域62个表层水体中PAHs单一污染物和混合物的生态风险。结果表明:高分子量PAHs具有较高RQ值,除5个采样点BaA的RQ值大于1.0外,其它均低于1.0。基于TEF转化计算获得混合物mRQ均值为1.58 ± 2.68,37.1%的样品mRQ值大于1.0,反映了PAHs混合物对巢湖流域水体存在一定的健康影响。分别采用Log-normal、Log-logistical、BurrIII和Rewibull模型构建了8种PAHs的物种敏感性分布模型(SSD),并根据BurrIII模型计算了各污染物的影响物种比例(PAF)。其中7个采样点BaP的PAF值大于5%,其余采样点PAHs的PAF值均较低,反映了BaP对巢湖流域水体存在一定影响。根据PRA模型构建了环境暴露浓度与毒理浓度分布的联合概率曲线(JPC),并计算了8种PAHs的联合生态风险(msPAFRA)高于HU加和法(msPAFHU)。结果显示所有8种PAHs均呈现较低的生态风险,其中Pyr和BaP的风险较大。比较三种方法发现,巢湖流域水体中高分子量PAHs对生态健康影响较大,而低分子量影响较小,且单一污染物的水生环境影响较小,但混合物的联合风险较大。
Abstract: In order to comprehensively understand the ecological impacts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), risk quotients (RQ), sensitivity species distribution (SSD) and probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) models were employed to assess the individual and mixture risks of PAHs in 62 surface water samples collected in Chaohu Lake watershed. The results show that RQ values of high weight molecular PAHs were higher than those of low weight molecular compounds. Average RQ values for all PAHs in all samples except for BaA in 5 samples were lower than 1.0, but the TEF based mRQ values for mixture PAHs in 37.1% of samples were higher than 1.0 with mean values 1.58 ± 2.68, indicating the potential impacts of PAHs on the water quality in Chaohu Lake watershed. SSD models were built using Log-normal, Log-logistical, BurrIII and Rewibull equations for 8 PAHs. BurrIII based PAF value for BaP was higher than 5% in 7 sampling sites, and the values of PAF for remaining PAHs were generally low. The values of msPAFRA for mixture PAHs in water samples were generally higher than those of msPAFHU. The results of joint probability curves (JPC) for environmental exposure concentration and toxicity data of 8 PAHs also suggest low ecological risks of PAHs in water of Chaohu Lake watershed. The results of three risk assessment modes also showed that higher risks of heavy weight molecular PAHs than those of light weight molecular PAHs to the water environment. Furthermore, there were negligible impacts of individual PAH compound on the water quality of Chaohu Lake watershed, but the mixture of PAHs posed high risks on the ecological system.
文章引用:王继忠, 张浏, 谢发之, 朱曙光, 彭书传. 基于多种方法评价巢湖流域水体中PAHs的生态风险[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2021, 11(3): 565-579. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2021.113063

参考文献

[1] 郭广慧, 等. 中国地表水体多环芳烃含量分布特征及其生态风险评价[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2012, 42(5): 680-691.
[2] He, W., et al. (2014) Ecological Risk Assessment and Priority Setting for Typical Toxic Pollutants in the Water from Beijing-Tianjin-Bohai Area Using Bayesian Matbugs Calculator (BMC). Ecological Indicators, 45, 209-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Wang, J.-Z., et al. (2016) Occurrence, Source Identification and Ecological Risk Evaluation of Metal Elements in Surface Sediment: Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Heavy Metal Pollution in Chaohu Lake, Eastern China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 307-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Xu, F.-L., et al. (2015) Key Issues for the Development and Ap-plication of the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) Model for Ecological Risk Assessment. Ecological Indicators, 54, 227-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Wheeler, J.R., et al. (2002) Species Sensitivity Distributions: Data and Model Choice. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 45, 192-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 赵晨, 等. 巢湖流域和太湖流域沉积物中苄氯菊酯和高效氰戊菊酯的生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(1): 27-37.
[7] Qin, N., et al. (2013) Ecological Risk As-sessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Water from a Large Chinese Lake Based on Multiple Indicators. Ecological Indicators, 24, 599-608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Liu, A.-X., Xue, L.-D., Liao, S.-L. and Zhou, H. (2009) Prob-abilistic Ecological Risk Assessment and Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Surface Sediments from Yellow Sea. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 83, 681-687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Wang, J.Z., Zhu, C.Z. and Chen, T.H. (2013) PAHs in the Chi-nese Environment: Levels, Inventory Mass, Source and Toxic Potency Assessment. Environmental Science—Processes & Impacts, 15, 1104-1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Xu, S.S., Liu, W.X. and Tao, S. (2006) Emission of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in China. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 702-708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Chen, Y.Y., Zhu, L.Z. and Zhou, R.B. (2006) Characterization and Dis-tribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon in Surface Water and Sediment from Qiantang River, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1143, 207-214.
[12] Zhang, Z.L., et al. (2004) Phase Association of Polycyclic Aromatic Hy-drocarbons in the Minjiang River Estuary, China. The Science of the Total Environment, 323, 71-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Guo, W., et al. (2007) Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water, Suspended Particulate Matter and Sediment from Daliao River Watershed, China. Chemosphere, 68, 93-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 石璇, 等. 天津地区地表水中多环芳烃的生态风险[J]. 环境科学学报, 2004, 24(4): 619-624.
[15] 刘良, 等. 应用物种敏感性分布评估多环芳烃对淡水生物的生态风险[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2009, 4(5): 647-654.
[16] 刘大超, 等. 基于逸度方法评价巢湖流域PAHs在水体-沉积物间扩散过程[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(3): 930-939.
[17] Hill, R.A., et al. (2000) Level of Detail in Ecological Risk As-sessments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 471-477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Crommentuijn, T., et al. (2000) Maximum Permissible and Negligible Concentrations for Some Organic Substances and Pesticides. Journal of Environmental Management, 58, 297-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 国家环境保护总局. 地表水环境质量标准[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1999.
[20] Wang, X.-L., et al. (2002) Characterizing and Comparing Risks of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in a Tianjin Wastewater-Irrigated Area. Environmental Research, 90, 201-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 吴艳阳, 等. 沉积物中多环芳烃的生态风险评价法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33(2): 544-556.
[22] 蒋丹烈, 胡霞林, 尹大强. 应用物种敏感性分布法对太湖沉积物中多环芳烃的生态风险分析[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2011, 6(1): 60-66.
[23] Wang, J.-Z., et al. (2014) Trace Organic Pol-lutants in Sediments from Huaihe River, China: Evaluation of Sources and Ecological Risk. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 463-469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef