高液限黏土的动力响应研究
Research on Dynamic Response of High Liquid Limit Clay
DOI: 10.12677/APP.2021.116036, PDF,   
作者: 吴文娟, 苏春华, 徐钦升, 张正超:山东省交通科学研究院,山东 济南;李洪利:山东高速服务开发集团有限公司,山东 济南
关键词: 高液限黏土行车荷载动弹性模量累积应变High Liquid Limit Clay Driving Load Dynamic Elastic Modulus Cumulative Plastic Deformation
摘要: 高液限黏土是一种特殊土体,为探究其在行车荷载作用下的动力响应,本文采用GDS动三轴试验模拟车辆荷载作用下高液限黏土路基性能随车辆载重(动应力幅值)、循环周次、压实度、含水量以及围压(路基埋深)等条件的响应规律。结果表明:1) 不同动应力幅值作用下,高液限黏土存在3种响应模式,临界动应力介于20~30 kPa之间,试样动弹性模量随循环周次增加而逐渐减小,并在N = 500时趋于稳定;2) 含水率对高液限黏土路基的动力特性影响于最为显著明显,压实度次之,建议将路基填筑含水率低于最优含水率2%;3) 相同动应力幅值条件下,固结围压越大,高液限黏土累积应变均越小,路基埋深越深,动荷载对高液限黏土的影响越小。研究结果对高液限黏土路基设计具有重要参考价值。
Abstract: High liquid limit clay is a special kind of soil. In order to investigate its dynamic response under driving load, GDS dynamic triaxial test was carried out to simulate the response of high-liquid-limit clay subgrade performance under vehicle loading with vehicle load (dynamic stress amplitude), cycle times, compaction, water content and confining pressure (subgrade burial depth). The results show that: 1) Under the action of different dynamic stress amplitudes, there are three response modes for high liquid limit clays. The critical dynamic stress is between 20 kPa and 30 kPa. The dynamic elastic modulus of the sample gradually decreases with the increase of cycle cycles, and It tends to be stable when N = 500; 2) The moisture content has the most significant impact on the dynamic characteristics of the high liquid limit clay roadbed, followed by the degree of compaction. It is recommended that the water content of the roadbed filling be lower than the optimal water content of 2%; 3) Under the same dynamic stress amplitude conditions, the greater the consolidation confining pressure, the smaller the cumulative strain of the high-liquid-limit clay, the deeper the subgrade is buried, and the smaller the impact of dynamic load on the high-liquid-limit clay. The research results have important reference value for the design of high liquid limit clay roadbed.
文章引用:吴文娟, 李洪利, 苏春华, 徐钦升, 张正超. 高液限黏土的动力响应研究[J]. 应用物理, 2021, 11(6): 303-310. https://doi.org/10.12677/APP.2021.116036

参考文献

[1] 王林峰, 田耘, 曾彪, 等. 高液限红黏土的压实特性与路基填筑方案[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(10): 1666-1670.
[2] 吴立坚, 钟发林, 吴昌兴, 等. 高液限土路基填筑技术研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2003, 16(1): 32-35.
[3] 胡一峰, 李怒放. 高速铁路无砟轨道路基设计原理[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2010.
[4] Okur, D.V. and Ansal, A. (2007) Stiffness Degradation of Natural Fine Grained Soils during Cyclic Loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27, 843-854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Gidel, G., Breysse, D. and Hornych, P. (2001) A New Approach for Investigating the Permanent Deformation Behavior of Unbound Granular Material Using the Repeated Load Triaxial Apparatus. Bulletin Des Laboratoires Des Ponts et Chaussees, 233, 5-21.
[6] Abdelkrim, M., de Buhan, P., et al. (2006) A General Method for Calculating the Traffic Load-Induced Residual Settlement of a Platform, Based on a Structural Analysis Approach. Soils and Foundations, 46, 401-414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 蒋文宇. 广西红黏土土质特征及土性改良研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2015.
[8] 张磊. 南方湿热地区高液限黏土永久变形预估研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2016.
[9] 周雄, 胡海波. 干湿循环作用下高液限黏土抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 公路工程, 2014, 39(5): 352-355.
[10] 龙滔, 石婧. 掺砂对于湖区路基黏土工程性质的影响研究[J]. 中外公路, 2019, 39(1): 19-33.
[11] 蒋红光, 陈思涵, 孙辉, 等. 黄泛区中高液限黏土动、静态回弹模量及预估模型研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(10): 1-12.
[12] 蒋红光, 曹让, 马晓燕, 等. 考虑持水能力的黄泛区高液限黏土路用压实标准[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(11): 154-163.
[13] 刘先林, 骆俊晖, 米德才. 广西花岗岩软土地基沉降预测及承载力评价[J]. 中外公路, 2020, 40(4): 25-28.
[14] 张军辉, 邓宗煌, 刘杰. 南方湿热地区既有路基快速检测方法研究[J]. 中外公路, 2019, 39(6): 6-10.
[15] 崔宏环, 王志阳. 冲积扇粉质黏土路基在交通荷载作用下的沉降变形影响因素分析[J]. 中外公路, 2018, 38(5): 1-7.
[16] 交通部公路科学研究院. 公路土工试验规程JTG E40-2007 [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2007.
[17] 张勇. 武汉软粘土的变形特征与循环荷载动力响应研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 中国科学院研究生院(武汉岩土力学研究所), 2008.
[18] 张思远. 长沙绕城高速公路路基动力特性及动态施工控制指标研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2015.