某框架结构的抗震性能检测分析
Seismic Performance Test and Analysis of a Frame Structure
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2021.106059, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 骆瑞萍:湖北省建筑科学研究设计院股份有限公司,湖北 武汉;中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉;贺洁星*, 王程鹏:中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉;徐胜超:湖北省建筑科学研究设计院股份有限公司,湖北 武汉
关键词: 框架结构抗震性能检测分析处理措施Frame Structure Seismic Performance Detection and Analysis Treatment Measures
摘要: 介绍了某框架结构进行抗震性能检测分析。针对该框架结构的抗震性能分析,主要进行三方面工作。通过进行房屋现状调查来了解结构的使用及破损情况,通过抗震构造调查来了解结构的抗震体系及构造措施,通过PKPM系列软件对该建筑进行抗震承载能力验算。结果表明:1) 设计不合理,结构体系不利于抗震,构件设计承载力不满足抗震要求,是导致结构不满足抗震要求的主要原因;2) 施工质量不达标,导致预制板拼接处出现裂缝,构件尺寸与设计不符,箍筋间距不满足要求,是结构不满足抗震要求的次要原因;3) 建议优化结构体系,改变结构受力方式,同时对主要受力构件进行加固,修补结构裂缝。
Abstract: The seismic performance of a frame structure is analyzed. According to the analysis of the seismic capacity of the frame structure, three aspects are mainly carried out. Through the investigation of the current situation of the building, the use and damage of the structure are understood. The seismic system and structural measures of the structure are understood through the seismic structure investigation. The seismic bearing capacity of the building is checked and calculated by PKPM series software. The results show that: 1) due to unreasonable design, the structural system is not conducive to earthquake resistance, and the design bearing capacity of components does not meet the seismic requirements, which are the main reasons for the structure not meeting the seismic requirements; 2) the construction quality is not up to the standard, which leads to cracks at the joints of precast slabs, the size of components does not conform to the design, and the stirrup spacing does not meet the requirements, which are the secondary reasons for the structure not meeting the seismic requirements; 3) it is suggested that the structural system should be optimized, the stress mode of the structure should be changed, and the main stress components should be strengthened to repair the structural cracks.
文章引用:骆瑞萍, 贺洁星, 徐胜超, 王程鹏. 某框架结构的抗震性能检测分析[J]. 土木工程, 2021, 10(6): 524-534. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2021.106059

参考文献

[1] 清华大学土木工程结构专家组, 西南交通大学土木工程结构专家组, 北京交通大学土木工程结构专家组, 叶列平, 陆新征. 汶川地震建筑震害分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2008(4): 1-9.
[2] 叶列平, 曲哲, 马千里, 林旭川, 陆新征, 潘鹏. 从汶川地震框架结构震害谈“强柱弱梁”屈服机制的实现[J]. 建筑结构, 2008(11): 52-59+67.
[3] 李宏男, 肖诗云, 霍林生. 汶川地震震害调查与启示[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2008(4): 10-19.
[4] 王亚勇, 戴国莹. 《建筑抗震设计规范》的发展沿革和最新修订[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(6): 7-16.
[5] GB 50011-2010, 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 中华人民共和国国家标准, 2010: 499p: A4.
[6] GB 50023-2009, 建筑抗震鉴定标准[S]. 中华人民共和国国家标准, 2009: 217p: A4.
[7] 叶列平, 陆新征, 赵世春, 李易. 框架结构抗地震倒塌能力的研究——汶川地震极震区几个框架结构震害案例分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2009, 30(6): 67-76.
[8] 李智明, 曹源, 胡慧莹. 某临江超限高层建筑结构抗震分析设计[J]. 建筑结构, 2020, 50(S2): 239-245.
[9] 陈钧. 对单跨框架结构房屋进行抗震加固的探讨[J]. 福建建设科技, 2020(6): 12-15.
[10] 戴春娇, 王颖. 预制装配式框架结构抗震性能分析[J]. 江西建材, 2020(10): 6-7.
[11] Dasgupta, K. and Murty, C.V.R. (2013) Improved Geometric Design of Earthquake-Resistant Rc Slender Structural Walls. I: Parametric Study. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 140, 04014006.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Yamada, S., Ishida, T. and Shimada, Y. (2013) Collapse Behavior and Ultimate Earthquake Resistance of Weak Column Type Multi Story Steel Frame with Rhs Columns. Journal of Structural & Construction Engineering, 76, 837-844.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef