不同地震动作用下高耸结构的地震响应规律研究
Research on Seismic Response Law of Towering Structures in Different Ground Motion
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2021.106062, PDF,   
作者: 黄健辉, 陈彦江, 许维炳*, 王 瑾, 沈铂坦:北京工业大学城市建设学部,北京;李娜娜:上海城建职业学院土木与交通工程学院,上海
关键词: 高耸建筑振动台试验地震强度动力响应Towering Structures Vibrator Test Seismic Intensity Dynamic Response
摘要: 高耸结构具有自振周期长、对低频激励敏感、抗震性能要求高等特点,为明确高耸结构在不同地震强度作用下的动力响应规律,本文以某典型高耸电视塔结构为原型,按照1:20缩尺比例设计制作了其缩尺模型。分别开展了二类场地地震动、长周期非脉冲型地震动、近断层脉冲型地震动在小震、中震条件下的一系列振动台试验。结果表明:高耸结构在地震动作用下为多阶振型参与振动;高耸结构在不同类型地震动作用下的动力响应规律大致遵循:长周期地震动 > 脉冲型地震动 > 二类场地震动;当脉冲型地震动的速度脉冲周期接近于原结构基本振动周期时,高耸结构的地震响应较同类型地震动更为显著;高耸建筑顶部在长周期和脉冲型地震动作用下具有显著的鞭梢效应。
Abstract: Towering structure has the characteristics of long natural vibration period, sensitive to low frequency excitation and high requirements for seismic performance. In order to clarify the dynamic response rule of towering structure under different earthquake intensities, this paper takes a typical towering TV tower structure as the prototype and designs a scaling model according to 1:20 scaling scale. A series of shaking table tests were carried out under the conditions of minor and moderate earthquakes, such as ground motion of the second type, long period non-pulsed ground motion, and near-fault pulsed ground motion. The results show that the high-rise structure vibrates with multiple modes under the action of ground motion. The dynamic response law of towering structures under different types of ground motion follows roughly: long period ground motion > pulsed ground motion > secondary field vibration; when the velocity pulse period of the pulse type ground motion is close to the basic vibration period of the original structure, the seismic response of the high-rise structure is more significant than that of the same type ground motion. The top of tall buildings has significant whipping effect under long period and pulse type ground motion.
文章引用:黄健辉, 陈彦江, 许维炳, 王瑾, 沈铂坦, 李娜娜. 不同地震动作用下高耸结构的地震响应规律研究[J]. 土木工程, 2021, 10(6): 554-560. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2021.106062

参考文献

[1] 姬淑艳, 刘芯鄢, 戴明辉. 某超高层结构在长周期地震动下的结构响应分析[J]. 特种结构, 2019(4): 16-21, 39.
[2] 姬淑艳, 刘烁宇, 李英民. 远场长周期地震动作用下超高层建筑响应特性[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(11): 1-10.
[3] Takewaki, I., Fujita, K. and Yoshitomi, S. (2013) Uncertainties in Long-Period Ground Motion and Its Impact on Building Structural Design: Case Study of the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) Earthquake. Engineering Structures, 49, 119-134.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 王天稳. 土木工程结构[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2014.
[5] 田春雨, 张宏, 肖从真, 等. 上海中心大厦模型振动台试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2011, 41(11): 47-52.
[6] Somerville, P. (2000) Seismic Hazard Evaluation. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33, 371-386.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Shih, M.H., Chen, C.L. and Sung, W.P. (2007) Collapse Analysis of Building Structures under Excitation of Near-Fault Ground Motion with Consideration of Large Deformation and Displacement. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16, 165-180.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Sehhati, R., Rodriguez-Marek, A., Elgawady, M., et al. (2011) Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions and Equivalent Pulses on Multi-Story Structures. Engineering Structures, 33, 767-779.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef