论PPP协议的解纷模式
On the Dispute Resolution Mode of PPP Agreement
摘要:
PPP协议兼有公法特性和私法特性，使其相关纠纷的解决在实践中也存在争议，在2019年出台《最高人民法院关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》后，将部分PPP协议纳入行政协议范畴，但有关PPP协议的纠纷解决途径仍然不明朗。本文通过群案分析，按照PPP协议的不同特点进行分析，提出通过行政附带民事诉讼途径来解决PPP协议的相关纠纷。
Abstract:
The PPP agreement has both the characteristics of public law
and private law, so that the settlement of related disputes is also
controversial in practice. After the introduction of the Supreme People’s Court
on Several Issues in the Trial of Administrative Agreement Cases in 2019, some
PPP agreements were included in the administrative agreement scope, but the way
to resolve disputes related to the PPP agreement is still unclear. This article
analyzes the group case and analyzes the different characteristics of the PPP
agreement, and proposes to solve the related disputes of the PPP agreement
through the administrative and civil litigation approach.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
财政部. 政府和社会资本合作模式操作指南(试行) [Z].
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/legislation/detail/MTAxMDAxMTI3MjM%3DsearchId=19b4f48e9cec4322af12b
211e4a39f85&index=1&q=%E3%80%8A%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E5%92%8C%E7%A4%BE%E4%B
C%9A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F%E6%93%8D%
E4%BD%9C%E6%8C%87%E5%8
|
|
[2]
|
(2020)川15民终794号判决书[Z].
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/judgmentdocuments/detail/MjAzMTg3NzMwODg%3DsearchId=3c9b04117a
90460da2bf4eba13b62985&index=1&q=%EF%BC%882020)%E5%B7%9D15%E6%B0%91%E7%BB%
88794%E5%8F%B7&module=
|
|
[3]
|
大英县永佳纸业有限公诉诉四川省大英县人民政府不履行行政协议案[Z]. 最高人民法院发布10起行政协议案件典型案例, p. 2.
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/judgment-documents/detail/MjAxMDA0NTI4NzY%3D?searchId=3913a791aa9c4840
8dd2a363555716c1&index=2&q=%E3%80%8A%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E5%8D%8F%E8%AE%AE
%E6%A1%88%E4%BB%B6%E5%85%B8%E5%9E%8B%E6%A1%88%E4%BE%8B%E3%80%8B&module=
|
|
[4]
|
(2020)川15行初37号判决书[Z].
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/judgment-documents/detail/MjAzMjEwMzE0NTc%3D?searchId=110ac693b7964ea7b
9ee357db9877bfb&index=1&q=%EF%BC%882020%EF%BC%89%E5%B7%9D15%E8%A1%8C%E5%88%9D
37%E5%8F%B7&module=
|
|
[5]
|
梁慧星. 民法学说判例与立法研究[M]. 北京: 国家行政学院出版社, 1998: 190.
|
|
[6]
|
许庆坤, 周爱省. 论BOT特许协议的法律性质与法律调整[J]. 山东法学, 1999(2): 20-23.
|
|
[7]
|
刘力. 论PPP项目合同性质证伪与补正[J]. 时代法学, 2019, 17(2): 211-218.
|
|
[8]
|
虞青松. 公私合作契约的赋权类型及救济——以公用事业的收费权为视角[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2013, 21(5): 36-43.
|
|
[9]
|
章剑生. 现代行政法总论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014: 197.
|
|
[10]
|
江苏省高级人民法院民一庭课题组. 政府与社会资本合作(PPP)的法律疑难问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2017(17): 73-78.
|
|
[11]
|
(2020)云民终1129号裁定书[Z].
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/judgment-documents/detail/MjAzMjE2NTUyNjg%3D?searchId=10e4905a27f546f78e
75d19643b171e8&index=1&q=(2020)%E4%BA%91%E6%B0%91%E7%BB%881129%E5%8F%B7&module=
|
|
[12]
|
(2020)云23民辖终29号判决书[Z].
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/judgment-documents/detail/MjAzMjc0ODIwNjU%3D?searchId=9e0baccec1134
b72b5794d6ef0e67442&index=1&q=(2020)%E4%BA%9123%E6%B0%91%E8%BE%96%E7%BB%882
9%E5%8F%B7&module=
|
|
[13]
|
(2020)云09民终632号判决书[Z].
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/judgment-documents/detail/MjAzMjg5MDU3NTM%3D?searchId=5603d63616884cd6
957a9e6c0189dc66&index=1&q=2020)%E4%BA%9109%E6%B0%91%E7%BB%88632%E5%8F%B7&module=
|
|
[14]
|
徐键. 相对人不履行行政协议的解决路径[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(11): 8-9.
|
|
[15]
|
最高人民法院关于发布第二批指导性案例的通知[Z].
https://law.wkinfo.com.cn/legislation/detail/MTAxMDAwMjU4Mjg%3DsearchId=876b016930924f9e929e708d686f28d2&
index=1&q=%E3%80%8A%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E5
%85%B3%E4%BA%8E%E5%8F%91%E5%B8%83%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E6%89%B9%E6%8C%87%E5%AF
%BC%E6%80%A7%E6%A1%88%E4%BE%8B%E7%9A%84%E9%80%9A%E7%9F%A5%E3%80%8B&module=
|
|
[16]
|
张静. 论PPP项目监管的国外经验及启示[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2019(6): 19-28, 206.
|
|
[17]
|
公私合作契约的赋权类型及司法救济——以公用事业的收费权为视角[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2013(5): 6-7.
|
|
[18]
|
虞青松. 公私合作契约的赋权类型及司法救济——以公用事业的收费权为视角[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2013, 21(5): 36-43.
|
|
[19]
|
耿宝建, 殷勤. 行政协议的判定与协议类行政案件的审理理念[J]. 法律适用, 2018(17): 124.
|