基于Simulink对轮式装载机行驶平顺性的研究
Research on Ride Comfort of Wheel Loader Based on Simulink
摘要: 为解决轮式装载机行驶平顺性问题,提出了一种行驶稳定减振策略,分别建立了加入行驶稳定系统前后的整机动力学模型,利用Matalab/Simulink软件搭建了E级工程路面及二自由度车辆振动模型,进行装载机行驶平顺性仿真分析,结果表明行驶稳定系统的刚度具有非线性输出特性,影响减振系统刚度的参数有初始充气压力、初始充气容积和等效负载,分析了加行驶稳定系统后的装载机对整机减振性能的影响,以垂直加速度为评价指标,装载机在加行驶稳定系统后,振动幅值降低,振动衰减快,在单位阶跃信号激励下振动幅值降低了48.96%,振动衰减时间快;在E级工程路面上垂直加速度均方根降低了56.53%,峰值降低了48.55%。
Abstract: In order to solve the riding comfort problem of wheel loader, a strategy of driving stability and vi-bration reduction was proposed. The dynamics models of the whole machine before and after adding the driving stability system were established respectively. The stiffness characteristics and vibration reduction performance of the system with driving stability were analyzed by Mata-lab/Simulink software. The results show that the stiffness of the driving stability system is non-linear, and the parameters that affect the stiffness of the vibration damping system include initial charging pressure and initial charging volume. After the loader adds the driving stability system, the vibration amplitude decreases and the vibration attenuation is fast. Under the excitation of unit step signal, the vibration amplitude decreases by 48.96% and the vibration attenuation time is fast. The root mean square of vertical acceleration decreases by 56.53% and the peak value decreases by 48.55% on the road surface of Class E engineering.
文章引用:石鹏飞, 李浩, 方甫, 巫成真, 司爱国. 基于Simulink对轮式装载机行驶平顺性的研究[J]. 机械工程与技术, 2021, 10(3): 396-406. https://doi.org/10.12677/MET.2021.103045

参考文献

[1] Lu, J.X., Bi, Q.S., Li, Y.N., et al. (2020) Estimation of Fill Factor for Earth-Moving Machines Based on 3D Point Clouds. Measurement, 165, Article ID: 108114.
[2] 王苡丞, 邱毅. 车辆座椅减振隔振性能及其人体响应的实验研究[J]. 小型内燃机与车辆技术, 2017, 46(5): 57-59.
[3] 张征数. 工程车辆行驶稳定系统减振性能分析[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2013, 44(1): 59-62+80.
[4] 提艳, 熊新, 李高战, 吴纪军, 郑竹安, 陈洋. 用于工程车辆的油气弹簧悬架的研究综述[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2017(12): 15-17.
[5] Westhuizen, S.F.V.D. and Els, P.S. (2015) Com-parison of Different Gas Models to Calculate the Spring Force of a Hydropneumatic Suspension. Journal of Terrame-chanics, 57, 41-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 董明明, 孟红芹. 油气弹簧刚度和阻尼特性及其影响因素仿真分析[J]. 车辆与动力技术, 2013(2): 47-50.
[7] 李占龙, 冯慧杰, 孙大刚, 韩斌慧, 张建广, 孙宝. 纵轴式掘进机垂直振动模型及座椅舒适性分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(5): 143-148.
[8] 郑利霞. 装载机工作装置油气减振系统的Matlab/simulink仿真及试验数据分析[J]. 科技传播, 2014, 6(18): 177-178+190.
[9] 司爱国, 王国彪, 徐进永, 郝国强, 刘淑强. 轮式装载机行驶稳定系统开发[J]. 矿山机械, 2004(12): 4-5+27-28.
[10] 智强, 鞠江, 李华莹. 基于AMESim的油气悬挂性能影响因素分析[J]. 机床与液压, 2012, 40(20): 91-93.
[11] Hamersma, H.A. and Schalk Els, P. (2014) Improving the Braking Performance of a Vehicle with ABS and a Semi-Active Suspension System on a Rough Road. Journal of Terramechanics, 56, 91-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 晁寇发荣, 高亚威, 景强强, 彭先龙, 王星. 基于路面等级自适应的主动悬架LQG控制[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(23): 30-37.
[13] Wang, S., Lu, Z., Liu, X.H., et al. (2018) Active Control of Hydropneumatic Suspension Parameters of Wheel Loaders Based on Road Condition Identification. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Zhang, R., Zhao, L.Y., Qiu, X.J., et al. (2020) A Comprehensive Comparison of the Vehicle Vibrationenergy Harvesting Abilities of the Regenerative Shock Absorbers Predicted by the Quarter, Half and Full Vehicle Suspension System Models. Applied Energy, 272, Article ID: 115180.
[15] 王家宝, 雷步芳. 油气弹簧刚度特性及影响因素分析[J]. 机械工程与自动化, 2016(1): 100-102.
[16] 张迪. 基于平顺性的矿用车油气悬架系统研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2016.
[17] 全国机械振动与冲击标准化技术委员会. GB/T 7031-2005. 机械振动道路路面谱测量数据报告[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版, 2006.
[18] 余志生. 汽车理论[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2018.
[19] 么鸣涛, 曹锋, 李勇, 曲劲松, 李丹, 王旭鹏. 基于MATLAB的汽车路面不平度重构方法研究[J]. 轻型汽车技术, 2020(Z3): 28-31.
[20] 吕晓鹏. 某型矿车油气悬架设计及多体动力学仿真分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2015.