隧道岩土参数概率分布及取值数目探讨研究
Study on Probability Distribution and the Sampling Number of Geomechancial Parameters in Tunnel Engineering
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2021.106070, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 龙大鑫, 李毅坤, 付江涛*:陕西理工大学土木工程与建筑学院,陕西 汉中;王军锋:常州市轨道交通发展有限公司,江苏 常州
关键词: 变异系数统计模型土工试验值取值数量柯尔莫哥洛夫–斯米洛夫检验Coefficient of Variation Statistical Model Geotechnical Test Value Number of Values KS Test
摘要: 本研究选取南方某地铁某线路岩土试验测定值(粘聚力值、内摩擦角值、含水量、压缩系数、孔隙率、压缩模量和天然密度)为研究对象,利用统计学理论对测定值总体所服从的概率分布进行拟合分析,分别获得测定值正态分布、伽马分布、瑞利分布、泊松分布和威布尔分布下的分布参数,并利用柯尔莫哥洛夫–斯米洛夫检验对上述分布的拟合优度进行计算,进而获得测定值的最优分布函数,然后通过随机抽取的方式,从总体测定值中随机抽取4组子样,每组子样本含量分别为30个、20个、10个和6个,并在该基础上分析所抽取的子样是否服从与总体相一致的概率分布,再通过方差分析,检测上述子样间的显著性差异,最后分析样本含量对概率分布参数稳定性的影响。结果表明含水量的最优分布为正态分布,天然密度最优分布为威布尔分布,孔隙率最优分布函数为伽马分布,内摩擦角不服从上述任何一种分布,粘聚力值最优分布为伽马分布,压缩模量最优分布为伽马分布。此外,当子样数为6时,7项指标均与总样本空间KS检测结果不相符,即较少的子样数会导致数据服从多种分布模型从而造成土体指标统计值与实际值产生偏差,当子样本数大于等于10时,利用统计学原理得到的土体物理指标值及分布类型愈稳定。本研究成果对于隧道、边坡、基坑等工程勘察中的土工试样试验取值数目的确定具有一定的参考与指导价值。
Abstract: In this study, the determined values of soil sampled from a southern city sub-railway were selected as the tested objects (cohesive force, angle of internal friction values, water content, compressibility, porosity and compression modulus and density of natural). And these values were analyzed based on the theory of statistics to investigate their probability distribution patterns, such as normal distribution, gamma distribution, Rayleigh distribution, Poisson distribution, and Weibull distribution based on Kolmogorov test to obtain their optimal distribution. Afterwards, 4 sets of samples were randomly selected from the overall samples and the quantity of each group of subsample was 30, 20, 10 and 6 respectively, and based on these extracted subsamples, analysis was conducted to text whether these subsamples follow the same distribution function as their parent samples. Based on these, ANNOV was used to analyze their consistence of the parameter with that of the overall samples. The results show that the optimal distribution of water content is normal distribution, the optimal distribution of natural density is Weibull distribution, the optimal distribution function of porosity is Gamma distribution, the internal friction angle does not obey any of the above distribution, the optimal distribution of cohesion is Gamma distribution, and the optimal distribution of compression modulus is Gamma distribution. In addition, when the sample number is six, the seven indexes and total samples based on KS test result are not consistent, the less the number of the sample will lead to a variety of distributed data model, which lead to a deviation of soil physical parameter from their actual values. And when the sample is greater than or equal to 10, the values of soil parameters based on statistical principle are stable. The results of this study have certain reference and guiding value for determining the number of test values of geotechnical samples in tunnel, slope, foundation pit and other engineering investigations.
文章引用:龙大鑫, 李毅坤, 王军锋, 付江涛. 隧道岩土参数概率分布及取值数目探讨研究[J]. 土木工程, 2021, 10(6): 622-630. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2021.106070

参考文献

[1] 吴振君, 汤华, 王水林, 等. 岩土样本数目对边坡可靠度分析的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(S1): 2846-2854.
[2] 何秉顺, 马东亮, 王庆苗, 等. 淮河堤防土体抗剪强度指标概率模型与参数优化估计[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2010, 8(3): 195-200.
[3] 赵晶, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 等. 信息不完备条件下提高边坡可靠度分析精准性方法研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2016(11): 115-119.
[4] 李飞飞, 牛真茹, 王涛. 合肥二级阶地黏土层物理力学指标概率统计及相关性分析[J]. 铁道勘察, 2020, 46(5): 91-95.
[5] 唐小松. 基于Copula理论的岩土体参数不确定性建模与可靠度分析[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2014.
[6] 张继周, 缪林昌, 刘峰. 岩土参数的不确定性及其统计方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(S1): 495-499.
[7] 吴越, 刘东, 孙树国, 等. 岩土强度参数正态–逆伽马分布的最大后验估计[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(6): 1-9.
[8] 陈立宏, 陈祖煜, 刘金梅. 土体抗剪强度指标的概率分布类型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(1): 37-45.
[9] 陈祖煜, 黎康平, 李旭, 等. 重力式挡土墙抗滑稳定容许安全系数取值标准初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(1): 1-10.
[10] 刘春, 任悦萍. 黄麦岭磷矿采场边坡岩体力学参数的确定[J]. 勘察科学技术, 2005(5): 32-34+61.
[11] 张文生, 罗强, 蒋良潍, 等. 边坡稳定分析中岩土参数置信水平取值探讨[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2017(4): 34-41.