肢体残疾人生命意义感与心理健康的关系:意向性自我调节的中介作用
The Relationship between Life Meaning Sense and Mental Health of Physical Disabled Persons: The Mediating Role of Intentionality Self-Regulation
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.116180, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘 玎, 卢宁*, 王春林, 孙伊桐, 李玫玫, 王小悦:深圳大学应用心理学研究与咨询中心,广东 深圳
关键词: 肢体残疾人生命意义感心理健康意向性自我调节Physically Handicapped Life Meaning Psychologically Health Intentional Self-Regulation
摘要: 目的:探讨肢体残疾人生命意义感、意向性自我调节和心理健康的关系。方法:方便采样,对广东省985名肢体残疾人施测生活目的量表(PIL)、意向性自我调节问卷(ISRQ)和症状自评量表(SCL-90)。结果:(1) PIL总均分及各维度得分与SCL-90总均分及各维度得分均呈显著负相关(r = −0.539~−0.883, p < 0.01),PIL四个维度与SCL-90总分相关程度由高至低依次为:生活目标、生活价值、生活态度、生活自主(r = −0.789, p < 0.01; r = −0.725, p < 0.01; r = −0.607, p < 0.01; r = −0.561, p < 0.01)。(2) ISRQ总分及各维度均分与SCL-90总均分及各维度得分均呈显著负相关(r = −0.497~−0.813, p < 0.01),ISRQ四个维度与SCL-90总分相关程度由高至低依次为:对待丧失的选择意向、补偿意向、优化意向、选择意向(r = −0.813, p < 0.01; r = −0.796, p < 0.01; r = −0.636, p < 0.01; r = −0.569, p < 0.01)。(3) PIL总分及四个维度与ISRQ总分及四个维度之间均呈显著正相关(r = 0.691~0.786, p < 0.01),ISRQ对待丧失的选择意向维度与PIL的生活目标维度相关程度最高,ISRQ对待丧失的选择维度与PIL生活价值维度的相关程度次之(r = 0.788, p < 0.01; r = 0.700, p < 0.01)。(4) 意向性自我调节各维度分别在生命意义感对心理健康的影响中具有部分中介作用,意向性自我调节的补偿意向维度中介效应占总效应的比例为27.78%;意向性自我调节的优化意向维度中介效应占总效应的比例为24.59%。意向性自我调节的选择意向维度中介效应占总效应的比例为19.39%;意向性自我调节的对丧失的选择意向维度中介效应占总效应的比例为30.27%。结论:(1) 生命意义感和意向性自我调节能力越强,其心理健康水平越高;生命意义感可以直接预测心理健康,也可通过意向性调节影响心理健康。(2) 肢体残疾人意向性自我调节各维度在生命意义感与心理健康之间呈现了程度不等的部分中介效应,提示心理健康工作者在促进肢体残疾人心理康复工作中非常有必要以团体心理辅导形式开展生命意义教育,以意向性自我调节各维度在生命意义感与心理健康间的中介效应程度为参考,依序开展针对各个维度相关意向性自我调节策略团体心理训练,并兼以生活化、日常化的心理支持促进意向性自我调节策略意识和能力的发展。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between sense of life meaning, intentionality self-regulation and mental health of disabled persons. Methods: A total of 985 people with physical disabilities in Guangdong province were tested by symptom self-rating scale (SCL-90), purpose in-life test (PIL) and intentionality self-regulation questionnaire (ISRQ). Results: (1) There was significant negative correlation among the total mean score and the mean score of each dimension of SCL-90 and the total mean score and the mean score of each dimension of PIL (r = −0.539~−0.883, p < 0.01). The degree of correlation between the four dimensions of PIL and the total score of SCL-90 from high to low is: life goal, life value, life attitude and life (r = −0.789, p < 0.01; r = −0.725, p < 0.01; r = −0.607, p < 0.01; r = −0.561, p < 0.01). (2) The total score of ISRQ and the mean score of each dimension were significantly negative correlated with the total mean score of SCL-90 and the mean score of each dimension (r = −0.497~−0.813, p < 0.01). The degree of correlation between the four dimensions of ISRQ and the total score of SCL-90 from high to low was: choice intention to deal with loss, compensation intention, optimization intention, and choice intention (r = −0.813, p < 0.01; r = −0.796, p < 0.01; r = −0.636, p < 0.01; r = −0.569, p < 0.01). (3) There were significant positive correlations between the total score and four dimensions of PIL and the total score and four dimensions of ISRQ (r = 0.691~0.786, p < 0.01). The choice intention to deal with loss of ISQR had the highest correlation with the life goal dimension of PIL, followed by the choice intention of ISRQ had the highest correlation with the life value dimension of PIL. (4) Each dimension of intentionality self-regulation had a partial mediating effect between sense of life meaning and mental health, and the mediating effect of the compensating dimension of intentionality self-regulation accounted for 27.78% of the total effect. The mediating effect of optimization intention dimension accounted for 24.59% of the total effect. The mediating effect of choice intention dimension accounted for 19.39% of the total effect. The mediating effect of the choice intention to deal with loss dimension accounted for 30.27% of the total effect. Conclusion: The stronger the sense of life meaning and intentionality self-regulation, the higher the level of mental health. The sense of life meaning can directly predict mental health, and it can also influence mental health through intentionality regulation.
文章引用:刘玎, 卢宁, 王春林, 孙伊桐, 李玫玫, 王小悦 (2021). 肢体残疾人生命意义感与心理健康的关系:意向性自我调节的中介作用. 心理学进展, 11(6), 1607-1617. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.116180

参考文献

[1] 曾文芳, 谭彩, 曾鑫(2017). 残疾人健康危险行为状况及其相关因素研究. 社会科学前沿, 6(10), 1334-1339.
[2] 常淑敏, 郭明宇, 王靖民, 王玲晓, 张文新(2020). 学校资源对青少年早期幸福感发展的影响: 意向性自我调节的纵向中介作用. 心理学报, 52(7), 874-885.
[3] 第二次全国残疾人抽样调查领导小组(2006). 2006年第二次全国残疾人抽样调查主要数据公报. 中国康复理论与实践, 12(12), 1013-1013.
[4] 洪伟, 唐勇, 张南平, 陈惠玲(2010). 肢体残疾者心理健康状况研究. 中国民康医学, 22(21), 2781-2782.
[5] 黄田艺, 陈定湾(2020). 杭州市肢体残疾人抑郁状况及相关因素分析. 医药前沿, 10(18), 249-250.
[6] 赖德胜, 廖娟, 刘伟(2008). 我国残疾人就业及其影响因素分析. 中国人民大学学报, 22(1), 11-15.
[7] 王国霞, 盖笑松(2011). 青少年期的意向性自我调节. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1158-1165.
[8] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云(2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.
[9] 吴靖萱(2015). 肢残人士心理健康现状及其心理健康服务需求的调查. 硕士学位论文, 西安: 陕西师范大学.
[10] 伍毅, 黄胜春, 贡东卫, 褚毅生, 陈优(2012). 肢体残疾成人心理健康状况及其影响因素分析. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 12(3), 261-263.
[11] 徐良雄, 石聿树, 熊昌娥, 刘祖松, 黄翠萍, 曾德志, 等(2019). 生命意义感对抑郁障碍患者自杀意念的影响. 海南医学, 30(21), 2733-2736.
[12] 周静(2016). 重庆市大学生生命意义感的现状调查与干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 重庆师范大学.
[13] Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholic, L. T. (1964). An Experimental Study in Existentialism: The Psychometric Approach to Frankl’s Concept of Noogenic Neurosis. Journal of Clinical, 11, 76-88.
[14] Gestsdottir, S., Bizan-Lewin, S., Eye, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The Structure and Function of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation in Middle Adolescence: Theoretical and Applied Implications. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 585-600.[CrossRef
[15] Gestsdottir, S., Bowers, E., von Eye, A., Napolitano, C. M., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Intentional Self-Regulation in Middle Adolescence: The Emerging Role of Loss-Based Selection in Positive Youth Development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 764-782.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Isaacowitz, D. M., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2012). Linking Process and Outcome in the Study of Emotion and Aging. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 3-17.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Jim, L. (2000). Phenomenological Reflection and Time in Viktor Frankls’ Existential Psychotherapy. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 31, 220.[CrossRef
[18] Krause, N. (2007). Thought Suppression and Meaning in Life: A Longitudinal Investigation. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 64, 67-82.[CrossRef
[19] Napolitano, C. M., Bowers, E. P., Gestsdottir, S., & Chase, P. A. (2011). The Development of Intentional Self-Regulation in Adolescence: Describing, Explaining, and Optimizing Its Link to Positive Youth Development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 41, 19-38.[CrossRef