基于FDAHP与独立性权系数综合确权的煤层顶板隔水性能评价
Evaluation of Coal Seam Roof Water-Resistance Performance Based on FDAHP and Independent Weight Coefficient Method
DOI: 10.12677/ME.2021.93036, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 范佳俊, 刘启蒙, 朱敬忠:安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南
关键词: 煤层顶板FDAHP独立性权系数法隔水性ArcgisCoal Roof FDAHP Independent Weight Coefficient Method Water-Resistance Arcgis
摘要: 在评价煤层顶板隔水性能时多采用单一主、客观赋权的传统多源信息融合方法,为避免这些不足,以布尔台煤矿42202工作面为例,在充分考虑影响4煤顶板隔水性能各因素的基础上,确定了粗中砂岩厚度、细砂岩厚度、粉砂岩厚度、脆塑性岩厚度比、岩芯采取率、隔水层厚度和隔水层组岩性组合指数为影响其隔水性能的7大主控因素;采用模糊德尔菲层次分析法(FDAHP)和独立性权系数法分别计算各主控因素的主、客观权重,归一化得到综合权重;利用Arcgis软件建立了工作面顶板隔水性能分区图。结果表明,区内西北向的隔水性能较强,与采掘工作面倾斜方向拟合效果明显,42202工作面煤层顶板岩层阻隔水性能在中等强度到弱之间,优于临近的42201工作面。
Abstract: Traditional multi-source information fusion methods with single subjective or objective weighting are often used when evaluating the water-resistance performance of coal seam roof. To avoid these inadequacies, 7 major controlling factors including the coarse and medium sandstone thickness, fine sandstone thickness, siltstone thickness, brittle-plastic rock thickness ratio, core monitor rate, waterproof layer thickness and lithology combination index of water-resisting layer group were selected based on the fully consideration of various factors affecting the No. 4 coal roof water-resistance. This paper calculated the subjective and objective weights of each main controlling factor respectively by the FDAHP and independent weight coefficient methods, and obtained the comprehensive weight by the normalization; using Arcgis to establish a partition map of the water-resistance performance of coal seam roof. The results show that the water resistance in the northwest direction of the area is strong, obvious fitting effect of the inclination direction of the mining face, the water-resistance performance of coal seam roof in 42202 working face is between medium strength and weak, which is better than that of the 42201 working face.
文章引用:范佳俊, 刘启蒙, 朱敬忠. 基于FDAHP与独立性权系数综合确权的煤层顶板隔水性能评价[J]. 矿山工程, 2021, 9(3): 233-243. https://doi.org/10.12677/ME.2021.93036

参考文献

[1] 张伟杰, 李术才, 魏久传, 等. 岩溶泉域煤矿奥灰顶部相对隔水性及水文地质特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(2): 349-357.
[2] 王洋. 煤矿充水含水层富水规律与分区评价及疏降水量动态预测[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2017.
[3] 石守桥, 魏久传, 尹会永, 等. 济三煤矿煤层顶板砂岩含水层富水性预测[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2017, 45(5): 100-104.
[4] 武强, 樊振丽, 刘守强, 等. 基于GIS的信息融合型含水层富水性评价方法——富水性指数法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(7): 1124-1128.
[5] 陈康, 薛国强, 陈卫营, 等. 一种煤层顶板富水性快速评价方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(4): 1752-1757.
[6] 贾鹏宙. 煤矿床含水层富水性定量评价方法研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(2): 168-172.
[7] 李刚, 李建平, 孙晓蕾, 等. 主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(12): 17-26+61.
[8] 蔡海兵, 程桦. 基于FDAHP理论的深部岩体分级方法[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2012, 39(6): 43-49.
[9] 邱梅, 施龙青, 滕超, 等. 基于灰色关联-FDAHP法与物探成果相结合的奥灰富水性评价[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(S1): 3203-3213.