基于使用UTAUT模型的移动学习研究分析——以2017至2021年国际期刊为例
The Analysis of the UTAUT-Based Mobile Learning Studies—Taking International Journals from 2017 to 2021 as Examples
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2021.114176, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郑银莲, 李荣杰:北京师范大学珠海分校国际商学部,广东 珠海
关键词: 移动学习UTAUT模型文献综述Mobile Learning The United Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Literature Review
摘要: 随着互联网与移动平台的快速发展,移动学习成为了新的发展趋势。在此背景下,整合型信息技术接受模型(Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, UTAUT)被广泛运用于移动学习的研究中。但目前基于UTAUT下的移动学习研究仍不够全面,缺乏从不同的角度对其进行系统性回顾。因此,本文筛选了从2017年至2021年2月份间有关UTAUT和移动学习的文献,并根据五种分类标准进行了全面分析。经过研究发现,绝大部分基于UTAUT模型的移动学习选择从其他理论中整合新的变量,以提高该模型的解释力。其次,问卷调查法被认为是在该主题研究中最受欢迎的一种调查方法。与此同时,高等教育被认为是该主题下最热门的研究情景。最后,本研究指出了现有文献的局限性并给予建议,也为后续研究提供了一定参考。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the Internet and mobile platforms, mobile learning has become a new trend. Against this background, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model has been widely used in mobile learning research. However, the current UTAUT- based studies lack a comprehensive systematic review. Therefore, this paper reviews the existing literature related to UTAUT and mobile learning from 2017 to February 2021, and conducts a com-prehensive analysis based on five classification criteria. The main findings indicate that most of the extant studies based on the UTAUT model focus on integrating new variables from other theories to improve the explanatory power. In addition, survey research is considered to be the most popular method. Meanwhile, higher education is the most popular research setting. Finally, this study points out the limitations of the existing literature and provides some directions for future research.
文章引用:郑银莲, 李荣杰. 基于使用UTAUT模型的移动学习研究分析——以2017至2021年国际期刊为例[J]. 教育进展, 2021, 11(4): 1136-1145. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2021.114176

参考文献

[1] Almaiah, M.A., Jalil, M.M.A. and Man, M. (2016) Empirical Investigation to Explore Factors That Achieve High Quali-ty of Mobile Learning System Based on Students’ Perspectives. Engineering Science and Technology—An International Journal, 19, 1314-1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Sanchez-Prieto, J.C., Hernandez-Garcia, A., Garcia-Penalvo, F.J., Chaparro-Pelaez, J. and Olmos-Miguelanez, S. (2019) Break the Walls! Second-Order Barriers and the Acceptance of M-Learning by First-Year Pre-Service Teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 158-167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Tan, G.W.H., Ooi, K.B., Leong, L.Y. and Lin, B.S. (2014) Predict-ing the Drivers of Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: A Hybrid SEM-Neural Networks Approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 198-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ali, R.A. and Arshad, M.R.M. (2016) Perspectives of Students’ Behavior towards Mobile Learning (M-Learning) in Egypt: An Extension of the UTAUT Model. Engineering Technolo-gy & Applied Science Research, 6, 1109-1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Abachi, H.R. and Muhammad, G. (2014) The Impact of m-Learning Tech-nology on Students and Educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 491-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Mis Quarterly, 27, 425-478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Fagan, M.H. (2019) Factors Influencing Student Acceptance of Mobile Learning in Higher Education. Computers in the Schools, 36, 105-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I. and Salloum, S.A. (2020) An Em-pirical Examination of Continuous Intention to Use m- Learning: An Integrated Model. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2899-2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Kumar, B.A. and Chand, S.S. (2019) Mobile Learning Adoption: A Systematic Review. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 471-487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Al-Adwan, A.S., Al-Adwan, A. and Berger, H. (2018) Solving the Mystery of Mobile Learning Adoption in Higher Education. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 16, 24-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Abu-Al-Aish, A. and Love, S. (2013) Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance of M-Learning: An Investigating in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 82-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Jairak, K., Praneetpolgrang, P. and Mekhabunchakij, M. (2009) An Acceptance of Mobile Learning for Higher Education Students in Thailand. The Sixth International Conference of eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, 17-18 December 2009, 1-8.
[13] Shiyadeh, S., Rad, M. and Jooybari, M. (2013) The Effect of Mobile Learning on the Future of Learning in Iran. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engi-neering and Technology, 6, 2668-2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Ali, R.A. and Arshad, M.R.M. (2018) Empirical Analysis on Factors Impacting on Intention to Use M-Learning in Basic Education in Egypt. Interna-tional Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19, 253-270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Hu, S.L., Laxman, K. and Lee, K. (2020) Exploring Factors Af-fecting Academics’ Adoption of Emerging Mobile Technologies—An Extended UTAUT Perspective. Education and In-formation Technologies, 25, 4615-4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Botero, G.G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S., He, T. and Zhu, C. (2018) Acceptance and Usage of Mobile Assisted Language Learning by Higher Education Students. Journal of Compu-ting in Higher Education, 30, 426-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Chavoshi, A. and Hamidi, H. (2019) Social, Individual, Techno-logical and Pedagogical Factors Influencing Mobile Learning Acceptance in Higher Education: A Case from Iran. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 133-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Hoi, V.N. (2020) Understanding Higher Education Learners’ Ac-ceptance and Use of Mobile Devices for Language Learning: A Rasch-Based Path Modeling Approach. Computers & Education, 146, Article ID: 103761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Sharma, S.K., Sarrab, M. and Al-Shihi, H. (2017) Develop-ment and Validation of Mobile Learning Acceptance Measure. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 847-858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Naveed, Q.N., Alam, M.M. and Tairan, N. (2020) Structural Equation Modeling for Mobile Learning Acceptance by University Students: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 12, 8618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Alsharida, R.A., Hammood, M.M. and Al-Emran, M. (2021) Mo-bile Learning Adoption: A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model from 2017 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16, 147-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Wu, W.H., Wu, Y.C.J., Chen, C.Y., Kao, H.Y., Lin, C.H. and Huang, S.H. (2012) Review of Trends from Mobile Learning Studies: A Meta-Analysis. Computers & Education, 59, 817-827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V. and Kamaludin, A. (2018) Technology Acceptance Model in M-Learning Context: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 125, 389-412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kuciapski, M. (2017) A Model of Mobile Technologies Ac-ceptance for Knowledge Transfer by Employees. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 1053-1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Kuciapski, M. (2019) How the Type of Job Position Influences Technology Acceptance: A Study of Employees’ Intention to Use Mobile Technologies for Knowledge Transfer. IEEE Access, 7, 177397-177413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Badwelan, A. and Bahaddad, A.A. (2021) Functional Re-quirements to Increase Acceptance of M-Learning Applications among University Students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21, 21-39.
[27] Sidik, D. and Syafar, F. (2020) Exploring the Factors Influencing Student’s Intention to Use Mobile Learning in Indonesia Higher Education. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4781-4796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Saad, A.M., Mohamad, M.B. and Tsong, C.K. (2021) Behav-ioural Intention of Lecturers towards Mobile Learning and the Moderating Effect of Digital Literacy in Saudi Arabian Universities. International Transaction Journal of Engineering Management & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12, 1-9.
[29] Hu, X. and Lai, C. (2019) Comparing Factors That Influence Learning Management Systems Use on Comput-ers and on Mobile. Information and Learning Sciences, 120, 468-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Pramana, E. (2018) Determinants of the Adoption of Mobile Learning Systems among University Students in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education-Research, 17, 365-398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] John, G.C. and Govender, I. (2020) Implementation of Mobile Learn-ing Using a Social Network Platform: Facebook. Problems of Education in the 21St Century, 78, 24-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Chao, C.M. (2019) Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Morchid, N. (2019) The Determinants of Use and Acceptance of Mobile Assisted Language Learning: The Case of EFL Students in Morocco. Arab World English Journal, 5, 76-79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Isaias, P., Reis, F., Coutinho, C. and Lencastre, J.A. (2017) Empathic Technologies for Distance/Mobile Learning an Empirical Research Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14, 159-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Aliano, A.M., Hueros, A.M.D., Franco, M.D.G. and Aguaded, I. (2019) Mobile Learning in University Contexts Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8, 7-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Lee, J.C. and Xiong, L.N. (2021) Investigation of the Relationships among Educational Application (APP) Quality, Computer Anxiety and Student Engagement. Online Information Review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Raza, S.A., Qazi, W., Khan, K.A. and Salam, J. (2020) Social Iso-lation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59, 183-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef