上海典型地貌重金属含量特征与潜在生态风险
The Heavy Metal Content in Shanghai’s Typical Landforms and Its Potential Ecological Risks
DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2021.93016, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈逸斌:上海申环环境工程有限公司,上海;王 磊, 徐 伟:上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海
关键词: 地貌土壤重金属生态风险上海Landforms Soil Heavy Metals Ecological Risks Shanghai
摘要: 针对上海湖沼平原、滨海平原,以及河口、砂嘴、砂岛和潮坪地带四种典型地貌进行土壤采样和检测分析,并对重金属的潜在生态风险进行评估。结果表明:调查范围内土壤样品重金属的含量由高到低依次为:Ni > Cu > Pb > As > Cd > Hg。所有土壤样品中重金属含量平均值与背景值较为接近。滨海平原、湖沼平原、潮坪地带、河口,砂嘴,砂岛的重金属含量依次递减。表层土壤样品中的重金属含量总体高于较深土壤中的含量。所有土壤样品的各种重金属污染程度均不超过偏轻度污染。所有土壤样品的各种重金属均属于低生态风险。
Abstract: Soil sampling and testing have been carried out on the lacustrine plains, coastal plains and four other typical landforms of Shanghai including estuaries, sand spits, sand islands and tidal flats, to evaluate the potential ecological risks of their heavy metal content. The results showed that the concentration of heavy metals analyzed in the soil samples was in a descending order of Ni > Cu > Pb > As > Cd > Hg. The average value of heavy metal content in all the soil samples was close to the background value. The concentration of heavy metals in the landforms was in a decreasing order of coastal plains, lacustrine plains, tidal flats, estuaries, sand spits and sand islands. The heavy metal content in surface soil samples was generally higher than in deeper soil samples. In terms of contamination level of heavy metals, the results revealed relatively low contamination in all the soil samples. All the heavy metals analyzed in the soil samples were of low ecological risk.
文章引用:陈逸斌, 王磊, 徐伟. 上海典型地貌重金属含量特征与潜在生态风险[J]. 土壤科学, 2021, 9(3): 129-139. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2021.93016

参考文献

[1] 上海岩土工程勘察设计研究院有限公司. DGJ 08-37-2012岩土工程勘察规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[2] Muller, G. (1969) Index of Geoaccumulation in Sediments of the Rhine River. Geojurnal, 2, 108-118.
[3] 舒伟, 高阳俊. 基于3种方法对河流底泥重金属污染评价[J]. 上海第二工业大学学报, 2018, 35(1): 1-9.
[4] 贾英, 方明, 吴友军, 等. 上海河流沉积物重金属的污染特征与潜在生态风险[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013(1): 147-153.
[5] 龙佳, 张宁, 崔佳. 黑臭水体底泥污染源调查及污染特性评价方法研究[J]. 市政技术, 2018, 36(6): 171-173.
[6] 陈伯扬. 重金属污染评价及方法对比: 以福建浅海沉积物为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2008, 17(3): 213-218, 228.
[7] 成杭新, 李括, 李敏, 等. 中国城市土壤化学元素的背景值与基准值[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(3): 265-306.
[8] Håkanson, L. (1980) An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control: A Sedimentological Ap-proach. Water Research, 14, 975-1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 生态环境部. GB 15618-2018土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准[S]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2018.
[10] 杨楠楠. 长三角地区土壤重金属的空间分异特征及风险评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2010: 35-47.
[11] Pan, Y.P. and Wang, Y.S. (2014) Atmospheric Wet and Dry Deposition of Trace Elements at 10 Sites in Northern China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 20647-20676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 林铁亲, 朱伟浩, 陈志良, 等. 土壤重金属的形态分析及生物有效性研究进展[J]. 广东的工业大学学报, 2013, 30(2): 113-118.
[13] 孙花, 谭长银, 黄道友, 等. 土壤有机质对土壤重金属积累、有效性及形态的影响[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2011, 34(8): 82-86.
[14] 俞天命, 田兆君, 谢正苗, 等. 铅锌矿污染土壤中颗粒态有机质对重金属的富集作用[J]. 科技通报, 2007, 23(4): 597-602.
[15] 王磊, 向甲甲, 殷瑶, 等. 河道底泥重金属的含量特征与潜在生态风险[J]. 净水技术, 2020, 39(10): 162-167, 172.