浙江省冬季降水相态预报指数研究
Index Research on Winter Precipitation Phase Forecasting in Zhejiang Province
DOI: 10.12677/CCRL.2021.104039, PDF,   
作者: 郑朝霞, 季晓光, 陆振斌:金华市气象局,浙江 金华;方 俊:金华市金东中心粮库,浙江 金华
关键词: WRF模式SRF指数降水相态预报WRF Model The Index of SRF Precipitation Phase Forecast
摘要: 为了探明不同微物理过程对浙江省冬季降水相态预报的影响,利用中尺度模式WRF (V3.9),采用NCEP/NCAR 1˚ × 1˚再分析资料和GFS 0.5˚ × 0.5˚资料,选取Purdue Lin方案、WSM 6类方案和新Thompson方案等3种不同微物理过程方案,在对2000~2017年浙江省冬季存在降水相变的10次降水过程进行敏感性试验的基础上,再选取2018年1月浙江省2次降雪过程进行SRF指数阈值检验和预报性能评估,得到不同方案的预报差异和SRF指数的阈值。结果表明:新Thompson微物理方案的指示作用相对较优;当SRF指数阈值设定为90%,能较准确预报出降水过程中雨区、雪区和雨雪混合区的分布以及降水相态随时间的演变。同时SRF指数预报时效较长,不同起报时次对降水相态判别结果影响不大。
Abstract: In order to ascertain the impact of different microphysical processes of WRF model on precipitation phase forecasting in Zhejiang, 10 precipitation processes with precipitation phase change in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2017 are simulated based on WRF V3.9, NCEP/NCAR 1˚ × 1˚ reanalysis data and GFS 0.5˚ × 0.5˚ data by three microphysical schemes, i.e. a Purdue Lin scheme, a WSM6 scheme and a new Thompson scheme. Then two snowfall processes in Zhejiang Province in January 2018 were selected to carry out threshold test of SRF index and forecast performance evaluation, and the forecast differences of different schemes and the threshold value of SRF index were obtained. The result shows that the prediction effect of the new Thompson scheme is optimal. It can accurately predict the distribution of rain, snow and sleet area during precipitation and the evolution of precipitation process with time when the SRF index threshold is set to 90%. And the SRF index has a long time-effectiveness because the different starting times have little influence on the result of precipitation phase discrimination.
文章引用:郑朝霞, 季晓光, 方俊, 陆振斌. 浙江省冬季降水相态预报指数研究[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2021, 10(4): 337-344. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2021.104039

参考文献

[1] Heppner, P.O.G. (1992) Snow Versus Rain: Looking beyond the “Magic” Number.Weather and Forecasting, 7, 683-691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Czys, R.R., Scoa, R.W., Tang, K.C., et al. (1996) A Physically Based, Nondimensional Parameter for Discriminating between Locations of Freezing Rain and Ice Pellets. Weather and Forecasting, 1l, 591-598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 许爱华, 乔林, 詹丰兴, 等. 2005年3月一次寒潮天气过程的诊断分析[J]. 气象, 2006, 32(3): 49-55.
[4] 漆梁波, 张瑛. 中国东部地区冬季降水相态的识别判据研究[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(1): 96-102.
[5] 张琳娜, 郭锐, 曾剑, 等. 北京地区冬季降水相态的识别判据研究[J]. 高原气象, 2013, 32(6): 1780-1786.
[6] 孙燕, 严文莲, 尹东屏, 等. 江苏冬季降水相态气候分析特征及预报方法探讨[J]. 气象科学, 2013, 33(3): 328-332.
[7] 林文实, 孟金平, 蒙伟光, 等. 华北暴雪的云微物理参数化方案的比较模拟[J]. 气象科学, 2009, 29(2): 150-156.
[8] 崔锦, 周晓珊, 阎琦, 等. WRF模式不同微物理过程对东北降水相态预报的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30(5): 1-6.
[9] 黄海波, 陈春艳, 朱雯娜. WRF模式不同云微物理参数化方案及水平分辨率对降水预报效果的影响[J]. 气象科技, 2011, 39(5): 529-536.
[10] 胡向军, 陶健红, 郑飞, 等. WRF模式物理过程参数化方案简介[J]. 甘肃科技, 2008, 20(24): 73-75.