湖北省省属高校的科研效率评价研究
Research on the Evaluation of Scientific Research Efficiency of Provincial Universities in Hubei Province
摘要: 本研究以2011~2018年15所湖北省省属高校为研究对象，运用数据包络分析法和Malmquist指数模型对湖北省省属高校科研效率进行测算，结果表明：样本高校科研效率整体水平偏低，仅有33%的省属高校DEA有效；非DEA有效的省属高校绝大多数存在科研规模投入冗余和各省属高校技术效率差异性较大等问题。建议省属高校应该制定人才引进与培养方案；对科研经费的分配进行调整，要关注科研成果的质量和转化率；提高对低效率省属高校的关注等。
Abstract: This study takes 15 provincial universities in Hubei Province from 2011 to 2018 as the research object, and uses data envelopment analysis and Malmquist index model to measure the scientific research efficiency of provincial universities in Hubei Province. The results show that the overall level of scientific research efficiency of sample universities is low, and only 33% of Provincial Universities are DEA effective. The vast majority of non DEA effective provincial universities have the problems of redundant investment in scientific research scale and large differences in technical efficiency among provincial universities. It is suggested that provincial colleges and universities should formulate talent introduction and training programs. To adjust the allocation of scientific research funds, we should pay attention to the quality and conversion rate of scientific research achievements. We should pay more attention to the low efficiency of provincial universities.
文章引用：徐巧芳, 王露. 湖北省省属高校的科研效率评价研究[J]. 教育进展, 2021, 11(4): 1285-1292. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2021.114196

参考文献

[1] 姜彤彤. “985”高校科研效率测算及区域差异对比[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2014(4): 35-40.
[2] 宗晓华, 付呈祥. “双一流”建设高校科研效率及其变化——基于超效率和Malmquist指数分解[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 26(1): 93-106.
[3] 彭迪, 郭化林. 基于DEA-Malmquist模型的“双一流”建设高校绩效评价研究[J]. 教育发展研究, 2020, 40(3): 29-37.
[4] 崔维军, 张薇薇, 张天娥. 江苏省高校科研效率评价研究: 1999-2007[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012, 32(4): 73-76.
[5] 苏荟, 刘奥运. “双一流”建设背景下我国省际高校科研效率及影响因素研究——基于DEA-Tobit模型[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 26(1): 107-118.
[6] 吴宏超, 马聪颖. “一带一路”沿线省份高校科技创新效率及影响因素——基于DEA-Malmquist-Tobit模型的研究[J]. 重庆高教研究, 2020, 8(6): 34-47.
[7] 邱泠坪, 郭明顺, 张艳, 张默. 基于DEA和Malmquist的高等农业院校科研效率评价[J].现代教育管理, 2017(2): 50-55.
[8] 蔡文伯, 李鑫洁. 我国地方高等师范院校效率评价——基于SE-DEA模型分析[J]. 现代教育管理, 2018(5): 41-46.
[9] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Effciency of Deci-sion Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Malmquist, S. (1953) Index Numbers and Indifference Sur-faces. Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. (1994) Productivity Growth, Tech-nical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries. American Economic Review, 87, 66-83.
[12] Bhutto, A., Rashdi, P.I. and Abro, Q.M. (2012) Indicators for Science and Technology Policy in Pakistan: Entering the Science, Technology and Innovation Paradigm. Science & Public Policy, 39, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] 覃雄合, 杜德斌, 刘树峰, 范斐. 中国省际高校科研成果转化效率时空格局与影响因素: 基于网络 SBM 模型的评价[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1641-1652.
[14] 潘懋元, 董立平. 关于高等学校分类、定位、特色发展的探讨[J]. 教育研究, 2009, 30(2): 33-38.
[15] 马陆亭. 我国高等学校分类的结构设计[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2005, 3(2): 101-107.

为你推荐