基于有限理性的地摊经济演化博弈分析
Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stall Economy Based on Bounded Rationality
摘要: 地摊经济是新时代保民生、促就业的重要举措,其如何在新时代持续健康发展一直是政府和人民关注的重要问题。本文基于局中人都是有限理性的前提下,系统分析了地摊经济中的政府、地摊摊主和消费者策略选择的演化过程。结果表明:当形象收益和不监管损失增大、监管成本和补贴降低时,政府倾向于选择监管;当合规摆摊成本和违规摆摊收益降低、合规摆摊收益和违规摆摊成本增大、违规摆摊导致的客户流失和政府处罚增大时,地摊摊主倾向于选择合规摆摊;当消费者选择摊主所获得的收益增大、选择违规摊主的损失降低、选择商店得到的质量保证收益和价格收益降低时,消费者倾向于选择地摊摊主。
Abstract: In this paper, the stall economy is an important measure to protect people’s livelihood and promote employment in the new era, and how to develop sustainably and healthily in the new era has been an important issue for the government and the people. Based on the premise that the players are bounded rationality, this paper systematically analyzes the evolution process of government, stall owner and consumers’ strategic choices in the stall economy. The results show that when the benefits of image and unregulated loss increase, regulatory costs and subsidies decrease, the government tends to choose regulation. When the cost of compliance and the benefits of illegal stalls decrease, and the benefits of compliance and the cost of illegal stalls increase, the loss of customers caused by illegal stalls and the amount of government punishment increase, the stall owners tend to choose compliance with the stalls. Consumers tend to choose stall owners, when the income they get from choosing stall owners increases, the loose of choosing illegal stall owners decreases, and the quality assurance income and price income obtained from choosing shops decrease.
文章引用:冉燕, 丘小玲, 田永艳. 基于有限理性的地摊经济演化博弈分析[J]. 应用数学进展, 2021, 10(7): 2457-2471. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2021.107257

参考文献

[1] 吴丹丹. 适度发展“地摊经济”缓解就业难问题[J]. 资治文摘(管理版), 2009(6): 7, 40.
[2] 杨世伟, 尹晶晶. 新时期促进地摊经济持续健康发展的思考[J]. 中国发展, 2020, 20(4): 36-40.
[3] 肖岚. 地摊经济的影响及对策分析[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2020, 23(22): 178-179.
[4] 李金霞. 扎根理论视角下中国地摊经济兴起的影响因素研究——以太原市榆次区为例[J]. 生产力研究, 2020(11): 90-93, 125.
[5] Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944) The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[6] Nash, J.F. (1951) Noncooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 289-295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Anderlini, L. and Canning, D. (2001) Structural Stability Implies Robustness to Bounded Rationality. Journal of Economic Theory, 101, 395-422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 俞建. 博弈论与非线性分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
[9] 丘小玲, 彭定涛, 王春, 陈拼博. 关于平衡问题的有限理性与良定性[J]. 应用数学学报, 2017, 40(2): 179-191.
[10] Qiu, X.L., Jia, W.S. and Peng, D.T. (2018) An Approximate Theorem and Generic Convergence for Equilibrium Problems. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2018, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 贺海龙. 非营利组织领导者行为研究——基于西蒙的决策理论[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2019, 22(4): 102-103.
[12] Jia, W.S., Qiu, X.L. and Peng, D.T. (2020) An Approximation Theorem for Vector Equilibrium Problems under Bounded Rationality. Mathematics, 8, 45-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Smith, J. and Price, G. (1973) The Logic of Animal Conflict. Nature, 246, 15-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Taylor, P.D. and Jonker, L.B. (1978) Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40, 145-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Schuster, P. and Sigmund, K. (1983) Replicutor Dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 100, 533-538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 李壮阔, 吕亚兰. 考虑公众参与的PPP合作演化博弈研究[J]. 系统科学学报, 2020, 28(1): 72-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 张一林, 马慧民. 基于演化博弈论的环卫自律组织激励机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 115-121.
[18] 卢安文, 何洪阳. 互联网信息服务业多元共治模式的作用机制研究——基于多参数影响的演化博弈视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 210-218.
[19] 崔萌. 协同治理背景下环保信用监管的三方演化博弈分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(3): 713-726.
[20] 乔根∙W∙威布尔. 演化博弈论[M]. 王永钦, 译. 上海: 格致出版社, 2015.
[21] 谢识予. 有限理性条件下的进化博弈理论[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2001(5): 3-9.
[22] 谢识予. 经济博弈论[M]. 第4版. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2017.
[23] 王先甲, 全吉, 刘伟兵. 有限理性下的演化博弈与合作机制研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(S1): 82-93.
[24] Ritzberger, K. and Weibull, J.W. (1995) Evolutionary Selection in Normal-Form Games. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 63, 1371-1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Friedman, D. (1991) A Simple Testable Model of Double Auction Markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 15, 47-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef