中老年教师教学创新行为及影响因素研究
An Investigation of Middle-Aged and Elderly Teachers: Creativity of Education Behavior and Influencing Factors
摘要: 随着我国人口老龄化速度的加快，中老龄工作者也成为当前研究者关注的重要群体；特别是他们会不会随着年龄的增长、认知的老化而出现工作效率，尤其是创新能力的下降成为研究者关注的重要问题。本研究采用教学创新行为问卷、成就动机问卷和机会关注量表(Occupational FTP)，对656名中小学教师施测，试图了解我国中老年教师教学创新行为随年龄变化的基本现状及其影响因素。结果发现：年龄的增长并没有降低中老年教师的教学创新行为，相反，中老年教师的教学创新行为依然处于较高的水平；成就动机、机会关注、教龄、年龄、任教年级、职称等均对教学创新行为有预测作用；教师的成就动机也并不会随着年龄的增长而下降，但机会关注水平会随着年龄的下降而下降。在现实生活中，我们应该放弃对中老年教师的刻板印象，充分认识并有效利用中他们的优势，才能有效应对当前的老龄化趋势。
Abstract: Along with the acceleration of population aging in China, middle-aged and elderly workers have become an important group of current researchers; in particular, whether they will work effi-ciently with the growth of age and cognitive aging, especially the decline of innovation ability, has become an important issue for researchers. In present study, 656 primary and secondary school teachers were tested with Teaching Innovation Behavior Questionnaire, Achievement Motivation Questionnaire and focus on opportunities scale (Occupational FTP). The aim is to explore the status quo at creativity of education behavior and influencing factors of Chinese middle-aged and elderly teachers. The result shows that aging teachers do not show reducing educational creativity; conversely, their ability remains at a higher level: creativity of education behavior could be partly predicted by achievement motivation, focus on opportunities, age, teaching age, teaching grade, title and the like; the achievement motivation of teachers shows no decline with age, nevertheless the opportunity concern level does. In practice, we should break with the stereotype about middle-aged and elderly teachers, recognizing and utilizing their strengths as an effective force to cope with the current aging trend.
文章引用：曾露, 余林, 王健 (2021). 中老年教师教学创新行为及影响因素研究. 心理学进展, 11(7), 1795-1807. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.117200

参考文献

[1] 柴江(2009). 中西部地区农村教师队伍的现状、差异与思考——以甘肃、山西两省为例. 教育测量与评价(理论版), (5), 18-21.
[2] 常阿伟(2004). 人口计划生育工作要重视人口老龄化问题. 理论观察, (1), 29-30.
[3] 陈培兴(2012). 关注中年教师的二次发展突破转型升级的瓶颈——基于行动研究的学校师训工作. 新课程学习(学术教育), (10), 177.
[4] 董静, 吴世民(2010). 中小学教师职业生涯发展的阶段与特点. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), (6), 69-71.
[5] 胡美娟(2014). 我国计划生育政策与人口老龄化的矛盾分析. 经济研究导刊, (32), 7-10.
[6] 胡祖兴(2012). 中学教师创新观、职业成就动机与创新教学行为的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[7] 黄希庭(2007). 心理学导论. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[8] 黄颖(2010). 高校教师成就动机的培养与激励. 黑龙江教育(高教研究与评估), (9), 56-57.
[9] 姜向群(1996). 计划生育与我国人口老龄化及老年人问题. 人口研究, 20(6), 58-62.
[10] 景怀斌(1995). 中国人成就动机性别差异研究. 心理科学, (3), 180-182.
[11] 李坚飞, 任理(2017). 自我认知、工作压力对知识型员工创新行为的影响——基于人-环境匹配的行为视角. 商学研究, (6), 24-32.
[12] 李磊(2016). 在课堂教学中学生创新思维的培养. 新课程(小学), (3), 53.
[13] 李品(2016). 企业员工个人成长主动性: 一般特点与影响因素. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[14] 李青青(2010). 中学教师创新能力及其培养研究. 硕士学位论文, 保定: 河北大学.
[15] 李祥妹, 王慧(2016). 人岗匹配视角下的老年员工人力资源开发策略研究. 中国人力资源开发, (8), 13-17.
[16] 林崇德, 辛自强(2004). 关于创新人才培养的心理学思考. 国家教育行政学院学报, (4), 35-40.
[17] 林唯, 华佳齐, 慕萃(2013). 教师在创新实验中与学生共成长. 现代教学, (10), 15-16.
[18] 刘晖, 杜明明, 杨一(2017). 人口统计学变量对员工创新能力的影响. 宿州学院学报, (3), 31-34.
[19] 陆婷(2017). 创新能力——小学中年级学生培养的关键期. 科学大众(科学教育), (4), 76-76.
[20] 蒲金龙(2006). 民办中学教师队伍不稳定因素的调查研究——以兰州市三所民办中学为例. 硕士学位论文, 兰州: 西北师范大学.
[21] 钱伟长(2002). 谈教师创新和学生创新的关系. 群言, (8), 3.
[22] 权月彤(2008). 学校组织创新气氛、教师创造动机与教师创造力的关系. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[23] 田宁宁(2017). 变革型领导、组织认同与员工创造力的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 浙江理工大学.
[24] 王占军(2013). 高校教师队伍老龄化问题的国际比较. 中国高教研究, (10), 10.
[25] 王振宏, 王克静, 游旭群, 等(2010). 教师效能、工作动机与心境对教学创新的影响. 心理科学, (5), 232-235.
[26] 吴欣怡(2010). 职业成就动机、教学情境与教师教学创新的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[27] 许淑莲(1999). 从老年人的心理特点看开发老年科技工作者智力资源的可能与特殊重要性. 见 充分利用老龄人才资源为科教兴国做贡献学术讨论会(pp. 7-12). 北京: 充分利用老龄人才资源为科教兴国做贡献学术讨论会.
[28] 杨舸(2019). 新中国成立以来的人口政策与人口转变. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 19(1), 41-53.
[29] 杨海英(2018). 老年员工知识管理影响因素研究. 北京劳动保障职业学院学报, 12(1), 45-50.
[30] 杨伊生, 张瑞芳(2008). 内蒙古小学教师成就动机与心理健康的相关研究. 内蒙古师范大学学报: 自然科学版, (4), 509-513.
[31] 钟文艳(2014). 公办幼儿园教师老龄化问题探析. 南昌教育学院学报, (6), 124-125.
[32] 周建洋(2013). 让中老年教师的工作激情得到点燃. 教书育人(校长参考), (3), 36-38.
[33] 朱开轩(1997). 全面贯彻教育方针积极推进素质教育——在全国中小学素质教育经验交流会上的讲话. 人民教育, (10), 6-10.
[34] 朱山虎(2012). 新乡市区中学体育教师创新能力现状的研究. 硕士学位论文, 新乡: 河南师范大学.
[35] Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Organizational Commitment: Evidence of Career Stage Effects? Journal of Business Research, 26, 49-61.[CrossRef] 
[36] Aspinwall, L. G. (2005). The Psychology of Future-Oriented Thinking: From Achievement to Proactive Coping, Adaptation, and Aging. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 203-235.[CrossRef] 
[37] Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development. Science, 312, 1913-1915.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future Time Perspective Scale. Unpublished Manuscript, Stanford University.
[39] Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U. et al. (2000). Emotional Experience in Everyday Life across the Adult Life Span. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 644-655.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Cate, R. A., & John, O. P. (2007). Testing Models of the Structure and Development of Future Time Perspective: Maintaining a Focus on Opportunities in Middle Age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 186-201.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Costa, P. T., & Mccrae, R. R. (2006). Age Changes in Personality and Their Origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 26-28.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Farr, J. L., & Ringseis, E. L. (2002). The Older Worker in Organizational Context: Beyond the Individual. In: International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Volume 17, pp. 31-75). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
[43] Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A., & Brooks, A. W. (2015). Compared to Men, Women View Professional Advancement as Equally Attainable, But Less Desirable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 12354-12359.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Hedge, J. W., Borman, W. C., & Lammlein, S. E. (2006). Age Stereotyping and Age Discrimination.
[45] Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, Adult Development, and Work Motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 29, 440-458.[CrossRef] 
[46] Maurer, T. J., Weiss, E. M., & Barbeite, F. G. (2003). A Model of Involvement in Work-Related Learning and Development Activity: The Effects of Individual, Situational, Motivational, and Age Variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 707-724.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Moss, F. E. (1993). A Future of Optimism. Caring National Association for Home Care Magazine, 12, 76.
[48] Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The Motivating Function of Thinking about the Future: Expectations versus Fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1198-1212.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Rudolph, C. W., Kooij, D. T. A. M., Rauvola, R. S. et al. (2018). Occupational Future Time Perspective: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 229-248.[CrossRef] 
[50] Sak, U. (2004). About Creativity, Giftedness, and Teaching the Creatively Gifted in the Classroom. Roeper Review, 26, 216-222.[CrossRef] 
[51] Seijts, G. H. (1998). The Importance of Future Time Perspective in Theories of Work Motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 154-168.[CrossRef] 
[52] Seo, H. A., Lee, E. A., & Kim, K. H. (2005). Korean Science Teachers’ Understanding of Creativity in Gifted Education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 98-105.[CrossRef] 
[53] Shultz, K. S., & Adams, G. A. (2007). In Search of a Unifying Paradigm for Understanding Aging and Work in the 21st Century.[CrossRef] 
[54] Sokolovsky, M. (1997). Interactive Minds: Life-Span Perspectives on the Social Foundations of Cognition (Book). Mind Culture and Activity, 4, 214-217.[CrossRef] 
[55] Wilson, G. T. (1978). The Importance of Being Theoretical: A Commentary on Bandura’s “Self-Efficacy: Towards a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change”. Advances in Behaviour Research & Therapy, 1, 217-230.[CrossRef] 
[56] Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining Time and Opportunities at Work. Psychology & Aging, 24, 487-493.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Zacher, H., Heusner, S., Schmitz, M., Zwierzanska, M. M., & Frese, M. (2010). Focus on Opportunities as a Mediator of the Relationships between Age, Job Complexity, and Work Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 374-386.[CrossRef]