传统肿瘤标记物预测胃癌新辅助化疗疗效的研究
Study on Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy of Traditional Tumor Markers in Gastric Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2021.118484, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘传绪*, 王熙勋, 胡金晨, 张翼飞, 姚增武, 姜立新#:青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院胃肠外一科,山东 烟台
关键词: 胃癌新辅助化疗疗效评估CEACA199CA724Gastric Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Evaluations of Response CEA CA199 CA724
摘要: 目的:分析传统肿瘤标记物预测胃癌新辅助化疗疗效的研究。方法:回顾性分析90例接受新辅助化疗胃癌患者的临床病理资料,记录患者新辅助化疗前后CEA、CA199、CA724的表达水平,并在新辅助化疗和手术结束后根据recist1.1评分标准将患者分为疾病控制组(CR + PR + SD)和疾病进展组(PD),根据Ryan标准将患者分为病理完全退缩组(pCR)和非病理完全退缩组(Non-pCR)。分别分析CEA、CA199、CA724在新辅助化疗前水平和化疗前后变化量对胃癌新辅助化疗疗效和病理完全缓解率的预测。结果:CEA阳性率与肿瘤的分化程度、淋巴结转移、疾病进展有关。CA724与肿瘤大小、TNM分期等因素相关。3种肿瘤标记物联合检测阳性与淋巴结转移、分化程度密切相关。CEA化疗前高水平对疾病进展可能具有预测作用(AUC = 682, 95%CI: 0.549~0.815, P = 0.010),最大化该试验的灵敏度(52.2%)和特异性(83.6%)的临界值为17.65 ng/ml。新辅助化疗后3种传统肿瘤标记物的水平较化疗前下降,CA724的降低量可能具有预测疾病控制的作用(AUC = 0.749, 95%CI: 0.550~0.947, P = 0.047),同时使试验的灵敏度(56.0%)和特异性(85.7%)最大化的最佳截止值降低了64.0%。CA199化疗前水平对非病理完全缓解可能具有预测作用(AUC = 0.740, 95%CI: 0.538~0.942, P = 0.036),最大化该试验的灵敏度(74.7%)和特异性(85.7%)的临界值为6.89 U/ml。CA724的降低量对病理完全缓解可能具有预测作用(AUC = 0.933, 95%CI: 0.839~1.000, P = 0.043),同时使试验的灵敏度(100%)和特异性(90.0%)最大化的最佳截止值降低了90.6%。结论:CEA、CA199、CA724可能对胃癌新辅助化疗的疗效和病理反应具有预测作用,对于胃癌的新辅助化疗可能具有指导作用。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the efficacy of traditional tumor markers in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 90 patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The expression levels of CEA, CA199, and CA724 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were recorded. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, the patients were divided according to the recest1.1 scoring standard. For the disease control group (CR + PR + SD) and the disease progression group (PD), patients were divided into pathological complete remission group (pCR) and non-pathological complete remission group (Non-pCR) according to Ryan standard. The levels of CEA, CA199, and CA724 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed respectively to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pathological complete remission rate for gastric cancer. Results: The positive rate of CEA is related to the degree of tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and disease progression. CA724 is related to tumor size, TNM stage and other factors. The positive combined detection of the three tumor markers is closely related to the degree of lymph node metastasis and differentiation. The high level of CEA before chemotherapy may have a predictive effect on disease progression (AUC = 682, 95%CI: 0.549~0.815, P = 0.010), maximizing the critical value of the sensitivity (52.2%) and specificity (83.6%) of the test, it is 17.65 ng/ml. The levels of the three traditional tumor markers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were lower than before chemotherapy. The reduction of CA724 may have a predictive effect on disease control (AUC = 0.749, 95%CI: 0.550~0.947, P = 0.047). The optimal cutoff value for maximizing sensitivity (56.0%) and specificity (85.7%) is reduced by 64.0%. The level of CA199 before chemotherapy may have a predictive effect on non-pathological complete remission (AUC = 0.740, 95%CI: 0.538~0.942, P = 0.036), maximizing the sensitivity (74.7%) and specificity (85.7%) of the test, the value is 6.89 U/ml. The reduction of CA724 may have a predictive effect on pathological complete remission (AUC = 0.933, 95%CI: 0.839~1.000, P = 0.043), while maximizing the sensitivity (100%) and specificity (90.0%) of the test, the best cut-off value is reduced by 90.6%. Conclusion: CEA, CA199, and CA724 may have predictive effects on the efficacy and pathological response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, and may have a guiding role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
文章引用:刘传绪, 王熙勋, 胡金晨, 张翼飞, 姚增武, 姜立新. 传统肿瘤标记物预测胃癌新辅助化疗疗效的研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2021, 11(8): 3333-3348. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2021.118484

参考文献

[1] Machlowska, J., Baj, J., Sitarz, M., et al. (2020) Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, E4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 本刊编辑部. 《中国肿瘤临床》文章荐读: 中国胃癌流行病学现状[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(6): 60.
[3] Shimada, H., Noie, T., Ohashi, M., et al. (2014) Clinical Significance of Serum Tumor Markers for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer, 17, 26-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Xu, A.M., Huang, L., Liu, W., et al. (2014) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery versus Surgery Alone for Gastric Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE, 9, e86941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Yusefi, A.R., Bagheri Lankarani, K., Bastani, P., et al. (2018) Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 19, 591-603.
[6] Charruf, A.Z., Ramos, M.F.K.P., Pereira, M.A., et al. (2020) Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Surgical and Pathological Results of Gastric Cancer Patients: A Case-Control Study. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 121, 833-839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Sun, Z. and Zhang, N. (2014) Clinical Evaluation of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125 in Gastric Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Tong, Y., Zhao, Y., Shan, Z., et al. (2021) CA724 Predicts Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. BMC Cancer, 21, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Wang, J.H., Mai, C., Hong, J., et al. (2012) Predicting Value of Serum CEA and CA19-9 in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Carcinoma. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 15, 1273-1276. (In Chinese)
[10] Abbas, M., Ahmed, A., Khan, G.J., et al. (2019) Clinical Evaluation of Carcinoembryonic and Carbohydrate Antigens as Cancer Biomarkers to Monitor Palliative Chemotherapy in Advanced Stage Gastric Cancer. Current Problems in Cancer, 43, 5-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Emoto, S., Ishigami, H., Yamashita, H., et al. (2012) Clinical Significance of CA125 and CA72-4 in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Dissemination. Gastric Cancer, 15, 154-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Imamura, Y., Yasutake, K., Yoshimura, Y., et al. (1990) The Changes in Tumor Markers Such as Serum CEA, CA 19-9, TPA and CA125 in the Chemotherapy of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer. Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy, 17, 1501-1507.
[13] Caponetti, R., Caponetti, T. and Vici, P. (2002) Changes in Tumor Markers CEA, Ca 19-9 and Ca 125 in Monitoring of Response to Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer. Clinical Therapeutics, 153, 373-375. (In Italian).
[14] Zou, L. and Qian, J. (2014) Decline of Serum CA724 as a Probable Predictive Factor for Tumor Response during Chemotherapy of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 26, 404-409.
[15] Derieux, S., Svrcek, M., Manela, S., et al. (2020) Evaluation of the Prognostic Impact of Pathologic Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy Using Mandard’s Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) in Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Digestive and Liver Disease, 52, 107-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Ma, Q. and Yuan, F. (2018) Pathological Evaluation System for Preoperative Treatment of Gastric Cancer. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 21, 1121-1124. (In Chinese)
[17] Xu, X., Zheng, G., Zhang, T., et al. (2019) Is Pathologic Tumor Regression Grade after Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy a Promising Prognostic Indicator for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer? A Cohort Study Evaluating Tumor Regression Response. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 84, 635-646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Koh, Y.W., Park, Y.S., Ryu, M.H., et al. (2013) Postoperative Nodal Status and Diffuse-Type Histology Are Independent Prognostic Factors in Resectable Advanced Gastric Carcinomas after Preoperative Chemotherapy. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 37, 1022-1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 田园, 杨沛刚, 李勇, 等. 进展期胃癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解相关因素分析及风险预测模型建立[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2020, 47(16): 829-834.