句法标记对不同水平汉–英双语者英语句子阅读的影响
The Effect of Syntactic Markers on Chinese-English Bilinguals’ English Sentence Reading
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2021.94144, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 仝 文：山西师范大学教育科学学院，山西 临汾
关键词: 句法标记；句子阅读；汉–英双语者；眼动研究；Syntactic Markers； Sentence Reading； Chinese-English Bilinguals； Eye Movements
摘要: 采用EyeLink II眼动仪，以高水平和低水平的汉–英双语者为被试，考察句法标记对英语句子阅读的影响。实验设置两种句子呈现条件：正常无标记条件、句法标记条件。研究表明：1) 汉–英双语高水平被试的阅读效率显著高于低水平被试；2) 被试水平与句子呈现方式交互作用显著：高水平被试阅读正常文本和句法标记文本效率相同；低水平被试阅读句法标记文本的阅读速度显著快于正常呈现条件。说明句法标记有效促进了低水平被试的阅读效率，结果为句法分析在二语阅读理解中的作用提供了证据。
Abstract: EyeLink II eye tracker was used to examine the effects of syntactic markers on English sentence reading, with high-level and low-level Chinese-English bilinguals as participants. The experiment set up two kinds of sentence presentation conditions: normal unmarked condition and syntactic marked condition. The results showed that: 1) the reading efficiency of the high-level Chinese-English bilingual participants was significantly higher than that of the low-level partici-pants; 2) the interaction between the level of participants and the way of sentence presentation was significant: the high-level participants read the normal text and the syntactic marker text with the same effect, but for the low-level subjects read the syntactic marker text with a significantly faster reading speed than that of the normal presentation condition. The results provide evidence for the role of parsing in second language reading comprehension.
文章引用：仝文. 句法标记对不同水平汉–英双语者英语句子阅读的影响[J]. 现代语言学, 2021, 9(4): 1067-1073. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2021.94144

参考文献

[1] 李琳, 刘雯, 隋雪. 句法加工中的预测现象及实验证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(7): 1122-1131.
[2] 龚少英, 徐先彩, 刘华山. 英语句法意识、阅读理解监控与背景信息利用的关系[J]. 心理学探新, 2010, 30(3): 34-38.
[3] Chik, P.M., Ho, S.H., Yeung, P.S., Wong, Y.K., Chan, W.O., Chung, K.H., et al. (2012) Contribution of Discourse and Morphosyntax Skills to Reading Comprehension in Chinese Dyslexic and Typically Developing Children. Annals of Dyslexia, 62, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 方小萍, 刘友谊. 语言理解中句法加工的脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(12): 1940-1951.
[5] 刘振前, Bever, T.G. 句法分析在外语阅读中的作用——一项实验研究[J]. 外语教学与研究: 外国语文双月刊, 2002, 34(3): 219-224.
[6] Fender, M. (2003) English Word Recognition and Word Integration Skills of Native Arabic- and Japanese-Speaking Learners of English as a Second Language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 289-315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Fender, M. (2001) A Review of L1 and L2/ESL Word Integration Skills and the Nature of L2/ESL Word Integration Development Involved in Lower-Level Text Processing. Language Learning, 51, 319-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Jandreau, S.M., Muncer, S.J. and Bever, T.G. (2010) Improving the Readability of Text with Automatic Phrase-Sensitive Formating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 17, 128-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Hell, V. and Janet, G. (2010) Event-Related Brain Potentials and Second Language Learning: Syntactic Processing in Late L2 Learners at Different L2 Proficiency Levels. Second Language Research, 26, 43-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 闫国利, 张兰兰, 卞迁, 徐子珺. 词切分对语文学优生与学困生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理学探新, 2012, 32(6): 525-530.
[11] Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. and Walker, S. (2014) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 李馨, 李海潮, 刘璟尧, 白学军. 阅读水平和阅读任务对英语词频效应的影响: 来自非熟练汉-英双语者的眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 455-461.
[13] Perfetti, C.A. (1988) Verbal Efficiency in Reading Ability. In: Daneman, M., MacKinnon, G.E. and Waller, T.G., Eds., Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, Academic Press, New York, 109-143.
[14] Hamilton, S.T., Freed, E.M. and Long, D.L. (2013) Modeling Reader- and Text-Interactions during Narrative Comprehension: A Test of the Lexical Quality Hypothesis. Discourse Processes, 50, 139-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Bond, R. and Andrews, S. (2008) Repetition Blindness in Sentence Contexts: Not Just an Attribution? Memory & Cognition, 36, 295-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Hersch, J. and Andrews, S. (2012) Lexical Quality and Reading Skill: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Contributions to Sentence Processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 240-262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]