全膝关节置换术后皮温变化联合检验指标在预测和早期发现膝关节感染中的应用
Application of Combined Test Index of Skin Temperature Changes after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Prediction and Early Detection of Knee Infection
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2021.118521, PDF,   
作者: 蒋莲萍, 翁艳钗, 诸葛霞, 余 蓓:浙江大学医学院附属金华医院骨一科(金华市中心医院),浙江 金华
关键词: 骨关节炎人工全膝关节置换术感染单因素Osteoarthritis Total Knee Arthroplasty Infected Single Factor
摘要: 目的:探究全膝关节置换术后皮温变化联合检验指标在预测和早期发现膝关节感染中的应用。方法:收集自2017年1月至2020年1月收治我院关节外科的378例TKA患者,其中32例术后发生感染,收集患者术后1天,术后7天,术后1月,术后半年和末次随访的皮温变化和血清学指标,比如白细胞量(WBC),血沉(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP),利用单因素分析和Logistic多因素分析TKA术后感染的相关因素。结果:单因素分析结果显示,WBC,ESR,CRP和患肢皮温是影响TKA术后感染的相关因素(P < 0.05)。并且相关因素赋值如下:WBC < 2.0 × 109/L为1,WBC ≥ 2.0 × 109/L为2;ESR < 20 mm/h为1,ESR > 20 mm/h为2;CRP ≥ 10 mg/L为1,CRP < 10 mg/L为2;患肢皮温 ≥ 38˚C为1,患肢皮温 < 38˚C为2。TKA术后感染的多因素分析结果显示,WBC ≥ 2.0 × 109/L,ESR < 20 mm/h,CRP ≥ 10 mg/L和患肢皮温 ≥ 38˚C是人工全膝关节置换术后感染的危险因素。结论:WBC ≥ 2.0 × 109/L,ESR < 20 mm/h,CRP ≥ 10 mg/L和患肢皮温 ≥ 38˚C是人工全膝关节置换术后感染的危险因素,临床上需要加以重视。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the application of combined test indexes of skin temperature changes after total knee arthroplasty in predicting and early detecting knee infection. Methods: From January 2017 to January 2020, 378 patients with TKA in the Department of Joint Surgery of our hospital were collected, including 32 patients with postoperative infection. The changes of skin temperature and serological indexes, such as white blood cell count (WBC), ESR and C-reactive protein (CRP), were collected 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, half a year and the last follow-up, Univariate analysis and Logistic multivariate analysis were used to analyze the related factors of infection after TKA. Results: The univariate analysis showed that WBC, ESR, CRP and affected limb skin temperature were related factors affecting postoperative infection after TKA (P < 0.05). And the relevant factors are assigned as follows: WBC < 2.0 × 109/L is 1, WBC ≥ 2.0 × 109/L is 2; ESR < 20 mm/h is 1, ESR > 20 mm/h is 2; CRP ≥ 10 mg/L is 1, CRP < 10 mg/L is 2; the affected limb skin temperature ≥ 38˚C is 1, and the affected limb skin temperature < 38˚C is 2. Multivariate analysis of infection after TKA showed that WBC ≥ 2.0 × 109/L, ESR < 20 mm/h, CRP ≥ 10 mg/L and affected limb skin temperature ≥ 38˚C are the risk factors of infection after total knee arthroplasty. Conclusion: WBC ≥ 2.0 × 109/L, ESR < 20 mm/h, CRP ≥ 10 mg/L and affected limb skin temperature ≥ 38˚C are the risk factors of infection after total knee arthroplasty, which should be carefully paid attention on.
文章引用:蒋莲萍, 翁艳钗, 诸葛霞, 余蓓. 全膝关节置换术后皮温变化联合检验指标在预测和早期发现膝关节感染中的应用[J]. 临床医学进展, 2021, 11(8): 3568-3573. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2021.118521

参考文献

[1] Gallo, J., Svoboda, M., Zapletalova, J., et al. (2018) Serum IL-6 in Combination with Synovial IL-6/CRP Shows Excellent Diagnostic Power to Detect Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection. PLoS ONE, 13, e0199226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Huang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., et al. (2019) The Serum Level of D-Dimer Is Not Suitable for Distinguishing between Prosthetic Joint Infection and Aseptic Loosening. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14, 407-421.
[3] Wang, Y., Man, Z., Yuan, T., et al. (2021) Reliability of D-Dimer Determination in Diagnosis of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surgical Infections, 22, 374-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Qin, L., Li, X., Wang, J., et al. (2020) Improved Diagnosis of Chronic Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection Using Combined Serum and Synovial IL-6 Tests. Bone & Joint Research, 9, 587-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Kuo, F.C., Lu, Y.D., Wu, C.T., et al. (2018) Comparison of Molecular Diagnosis with Serum Markers and Synovial Fluid Analysis in Patients with Prosthetic Joint Infection. The Bone & Joint Journal, 100, 1345-1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Sousa, R., Serrano, P., Gomes Dias, J., et al. (2017) Improving the Accuracy of Synovial Fluid Analysis in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection with Simple and Inexpensive Biomarkers: C-Reactive Protein and Adenosine Deaminase. The Bone & Joint Journal, 99-B, 351-357.
[7] Fernández-Sampedro, M., Fariñas-Alvarez, C., Garces-Zarzalejo, C., et al. (2017) Accuracy of Different Diagnostic Tests for Early, Delayed and Late Prosthetic Joint Infection. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17, 592-605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ghani, R., Hutt, J., Mitchell, P., et al. (2020) Serial C-Reactive Protein Monitoring in Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Powerful Predictor or Potentially Pointless? Cureus, 12, 6967-6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Pérez-Prieto, D., Portillo, M.E., Puig-Verdié, L., et al. (2017) C-Reactive Protein May Misdiagnose Prosthetic Joint Infections, Particularly Chronic and Low-Grade Infections. International Orthopaedics, 41, 1315-1319.
[10] Ackmann, T., Möllenbeck, B., Gosheger, G., et al. (2020) Comparing the Diagnostic Value of Serum D-Dimer to CRP and IL-6 in the Diagnosis of Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9, 2917-2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]