高脂血症性急性胰腺炎合并动脉粥样硬化严重程度的相关分析
Correlation Analysis of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis with Atherosclerosis Severity
摘要: 目的:探讨高脂血症急性胰腺炎(HLAP)伴动脉粥样硬化(AS)的相关性分析。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年1月青岛大学附属医院全院急诊收治符合HLAP诊断标准的患者432例,并且其中伴AS患者120例,进行回顾性分析。按照既往是否诊断AS,将HLAP分为AS组(120例)和非AS组(312例)。比较两组一般资料、实验室指标、急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, APACHE II)、Balthazar CT评分。采用独立样本t检验、两样本秩和检验、卡方检验进行统计学比较,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线及Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析。结果:AS组与非AS组年龄、住院天数、复发次数、住院费用均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),而性别构成(X2 = 1.459,P值 > 0.05)差异无统计学意义。实验室检查指标中,AS组中与非AS组比较,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C),总胆固醇(TC),甘油三酯(TG),游离脂肪酸(FFA),脂蛋白a (LPa),总胆汁酸(TBA),总胆红素(TBIL),直接胆红素(DBIL),总钙(Ca),肌酸激酶同工酶,胱抑素(Cys-C),BMI (P均<0.05)两者差异存在统计学意义。而对比前白蛋白(PA),白蛋白(ALB),肌酐(Crea),肌酸激酶(CK) (P > 0.05)差异无统计学意义。评分系统中AS组的Balthazar评分及APACHE II评分较非AS组升高(P < 0.05),差异具有统计学意义。入院后基本生命体征中,呼吸频率与体温两者比较存在差异,其余差异无统计学意义。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,AS组较非AS组住院时间明显延长,AS组平均值为29.50,非AS组的平均值为12.57,X2 = 111.26,P < 0.001,95%置信区间(11.353, 13.786)。Cox比例风险模型,X2 = 103.274,P < 0.001。结论:AS是HLAP发生的危险因素,伴有AS的HLAP患者再发率明显升高,预后明显较差。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the correlation between hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis (HLAP) and atherosclerosis (AS). Methods: A total of 432 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of HLAP admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2019 to January 2021, including 120 patients with AS, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the previous diagnosis of AS, HLAP was divided into AS group (120 cases) and non-AS group (312 cases). General data, laboratory indicators, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (Apache Arch) and Balthazar CT scores were compared between the two groups. The independent sample t test, the rank sum test of the two samples and the chi-square test were used for statistical comparison. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional risk model were used for survival analysis. Results: There were statistically significant differences in age, length of stay, frequency of recurrence and hospitalization cost between AS group and non-AS group (P < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in gender composition (P value > 0.05). In the laboratory tests, compared with the non-AS group, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), Total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), free fatty acid (FFA), Lipoprotein A (LPA), total bile acid (TBA), total bilirubin (TBIL), Direct bilirubin (DBIL), Total calcium (Ca), creatine kinase isoenzyme, Cystatin (Cys-C), BMI, (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in prealbumin (PA), albumin (ALB), creatinine (CREA) and creatine kinase (CK) (P > 0.05). In the scoring system, Balthazar score and Apache II score in AS group were higher than those in non-AS group (P < 0.05), and the differences were statistically significant. In the basic vital signs after admission, there were differences between respiratory rate and body temperature, while the other differences were not statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the hospital stay in the AS group was significantly longer than that in the non-AS group, the mean value of the AS group was 29.50, and the mean value of the non-AS group was 12.57, X2 = 111.26, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (11.353, 13.786). Cox proportional risk model, X2 = 103.274, P < 0.001. Conclusion: AS is a risk factor for the occurrence of HLAP, and the recurrence rate of HLAP patients with AS is significantly increased and the prognosis is significantly poor.
文章引用:田飞, 王潇潇, 吴自谦, 潘越, 潘新亭. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎合并动脉粥样硬化严重程度的相关分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2021, 11(8): 3731-3737. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2021.118547

参考文献

[1] Wang, L., Zhou, B., Zhao, Z., et al. (2021) Body-Mass Index and Obesity in Urban and Rural China: Findings from Consecutive Nationally Representative Surveys during 2004-18. Lancet (London, England), 398, 53-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Chuang, S.C., Lee, K.T., Wang, S.N., Kuo, K.K. and Chen, J.S. (2006) Hypertriglyceridemia-Associated Acute Pancreatitis with Chylous Ascites in Pregnancy. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 105, 583-587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 张运. 动脉粥样硬化研究的当前问题[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2011, 9(39): 785-788.
[4] 赵丹丹, 张玫. 中老年急性胰腺炎患者临床特点分析[J]. 中国医药, 2021, 16(3): 397-399.
[5] 谢宇, 孙备. 胰腺炎基础研究进展与展望[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(1): 60-65.
[6] 胡大一. 中国血脂异常与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病防控的新证据和新指南[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(10): 826-827.
[7] Havel, R.J. (1969) Pathogenesis, Differentiation and Management of Hypertriglyceridemia. Advances in Internal Medicine, 15, 117-154.
[8] Yang, A.L. and McNabb-Baltar, J. (2020) Hypertriglyceridemia and Acute Pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 20, 795-800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Z¢dori, N., Gede, N., Antal, J., et al. (2020) Early Elimination of Fatty Acids in Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis (ELEFANT Trial): Protocol of an Open-Label, Multicenter, Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trial. Pancreatology, 20, 369-376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 郭明秋, 殷晓捷, 刁殿琰, 原江水. 脂质代谢水平与冠状动脉粥样硬化病变的关系[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2021, 29(2): 149-155.
[11] Prasada, R., Dhaka, N., Bahl, A., Yadav, T.D. and Kochhar, R. (2018) Prevalence of Cardiovascular Dysfunction and Its Association with Outcome in Patients with Acute Panc Reatitis. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 37, 113-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 王蔚虹. 重视重症急性胰腺炎心脏损伤的诊治[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2019, 39(5): 294-297.
[13] 李若畅, 张景丽, 李瑞, 等. 急性胰腺炎并发门静脉系统血栓152例临床特点和临床预测[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2021, 41(1): 29-34.
[14] 李曼, 邢小康, 郭丰. 6种评分系统和4个实验室检查指标对重症急性胰腺炎预后的评估作用[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2018, 38(10): 673-677.
[15] 陈方莹, 柏小寅, 吴东. 预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的评分系统及生物标志物[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2019, 58(8): 615-619.
[16] 第二次中国临床血脂控制状况多中心协作研究组. 第二次中国临床血脂控制达标率及影响因素多中心协作研究[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2007, 35(5): 420-427.
[17] 刘浩, 余金明, 陈芳, 潘长玉, 李觉, 胡大一. 冠心病患者血脂代谢异常的流行病学研究[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2007, 27(12): 965-967.