动物侵权责任主体的认定标准研究
Research on the Identification Standard of the Subject of Animal Tort Liability
摘要: 在动物侵权责任主体相关问题的研究中,对于我国现行法律规定下的责任主体表述进行深入探讨。结合相关案例对不同情形下动物致人损害的民事责任主体认定标准进行司法实务上的总结,对于其中涉及的物权权属标准与实际管理控制标准的关系,以及未来运用实际管理控制标准的合理性基础进行思考。对实际管理控制标准下的具体认定因素进行讨论,以期对在理论和司法实务中,合理性、正当性地认侵权责任主体。
Abstract:
In the research on the subject of animal tort liability, the expression of the subject of liability under China’s current laws is deeply discussed. Combined with relevant cases, this paper summarizes the criteria for determining the subject of civil liability for human damage caused by animals under different circumstances in judicial practice, and considers the relationship between the property right ownership standard and the actual management control standard, as well as the rational basis of applying the actual management control standard in the future. The specific identification factors under the actual management control standard are discussed in order to rationally and legitimately recognize the subject of tort liability in theory and judicial practice.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
马治选. 饲养动物致人损害的民事责任探析[J]. 法律科学-西北政法学院学报, 1996(3): 50-55.
|
|
[2]
|
房绍坤. 试论动物致人损害的民事责任[J]. 中外法学, 1992(6): 36-40.
|
|
[3]
|
张新宝. 饲养动物致人损害的赔偿责任[J]. 法学研究, 1994(2): 91-97.
|
|
[4]
|
程啸. 侵权责任法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011: 505.
|
|
[5]
|
朱晓峰. 比较法上动物侵权责任主体的界定标准及启示[J]. 比较法研究, 2018(3): 83-102.
|
|
[6]
|
Ellickson, R.C. (1986) Of Coase and Cattle: Disputes Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review, 38, 623-687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
[美] Vincent R. Johnson. 美国侵权法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2004: 167.
|
|
[8]
|
叶锋. 动物致害责任主体的解释构造[J]. 法律适用, 2014(10): 81-88.
|
|
[9]
|
张玉东. 论饲养动物损害责任主体的适用规则——以《侵权责任法》第78条为中心[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 31(6): 11-19.
|