高压旋喷桩桩周土的变形和渗透特性研究
Deformation and Permeability Characteristics of Soil around High Pressure Jet Grouting Pile
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2021.119111, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 朱汉强, 卢 浩:浙江良和交通建设有限公司,浙江 宁波;林法力, 朱赞成*:台州学院建筑工程学院,浙江 台州
关键词: 软土高压旋喷桩桩周土压缩特性渗透系数Soft Soil High Pressure Jet Grouting Pile Soil around the Pile Compression Characteristics Permeability Coefficient
摘要: 桩周土的渗透系数和固结变形对桩侧摩阻力的发挥起着重要的作用。为了测试距高压旋喷桩不同桩距和深度下的试样压缩回弹特性、渗透特性及其与矿物成分之间的关系,对其试样进行了固结试验和X衍射试验(XRD)。利用时间平方根方法计算固结试验中每一级荷载下的固结系数,再利用太沙基一维固结理论计算软黏土的渗透系数。试验结果研究表明:软黏土屈服后,远桩土与桩间土的压缩曲线近似平行,5 m、15 m处的远桩土的压缩指数和回弹指数稍微大于桩间土的压缩指数。在双对数坐标下,渗透系数随压缩应力的增大而减小;渗透系数随孔隙比减小而减小,且二者间呈线性关系;与试样的初始孔隙比、应力路径无关。塑限、液限随黏土矿物成分的增加而增大,渗透系数反之。
Abstract: The permeability coefficient and consolidation deformation of the soil around the pile play an important role in the play of the lateral frictional resistance of the pile. In order to test the compressive rebound properties, permeability properties and their relationship with mineral composition of the specimens at different pile spacing and depths from the high-pressure rotary piles, consolidation tests and X diffraction tests (XRD) were performed on their specimens. The time square root method is used to calculate the consolidation coefficient by conducting series of one-dimension compression test, and the permeability coefficient of soft clay can be calculated by the Terzaghi’s one-dimensional consolidation theory. The experimental results show that the compression curves of the far pile soil and the soil between piles are approximately parallel after the soft clay yield. The compression index and rebound index of the far pile soil at 5 m and 15 m are slightly larger than those of the soil between piles. In double logarithmic coordinates, the permeability coefficient decreases with the increase of compressive stress. The permeability coefficient decreases with the decrease of void ratio, and there is a linear relationship between them. It is independent of the initial void ratio and stress path of the specimen. The plastic limit and liquid limit increase with the increase of clay mineral composition, and the permeability coefficient inversely.
文章引用:朱汉强, 卢浩, 林法力, 朱赞成. 高压旋喷桩桩周土的变形和渗透特性研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2021, 11(9): 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2021.119111

参考文献

[1] 张登荣, 许思莹, 谢斌, 吴文渊, 路海烽. 近40年椒江–台州湾滩涂围垦土地利用变化的遥感调查[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2016, 28(1): 101-106.
[2] 万先逵, 袁聪聪, 黄展军, 褚东升, 曹成威, 石钰锋. 某深厚软土地层基坑支护方案优化研究[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2020, 37(5): 47-52.
[3] 祝卫东. 温州软土与台州软土工程特性及其比较分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2003.
[4] 陈波, 孙德安, 吕海波. 海相软土压缩特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013(2): 381-388.
[5] 武朝军. 上海浅部土层沉积环境及其物理力学性质[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2016.
[6] 张虎元, 赵天宇, 卢一亭, 张明. 膨胀条件下混合型缓冲回填材料的渗透特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(S1): 3149-3156.
[7] Nishida, Y., Koike, H. and Nakagawa, S. (1971) Coefficient of Permeability of Highly Plastic Clays. Proceedings of 4th Budapest Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Budapest, 12-15 October 1971, 219-224.
[8] 孙文静, 孙德安, 方雷. 饱和高庙子钙基膨润土的变形特性和渗透特性[C]//中国环境科学学会, 中国岩石力学与工程学会, 中国核学会. 第四届废物地下处置学术研讨会论文集, 北京: 中国原子能出版社, 2012: 191-196.
[9] 王勇军. 台州市区工程地质特性及基础型式合理选用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2008.
[10] 朱赞成, 李纪伟, 林法力, 陈雰, 孙德安, 刘藤. 不同矿物成分下土样脱附曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(1): 175-180.
[11] 杨凤灵, 吴燕, 李卿, 王军权. 高压旋喷桩复合地基的基本特性[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 27(1): 97-99.
[12] 胡焕校, 刘静. 高压旋喷桩桩周土摩阻力的分析与探讨[J]. 地质与勘探, 2003, 39(2): 88-90.
[13] 吕成. 基于现场试验的高压旋喷桩承载特性变化规律研究[J]. 安徽建筑, 2014, 21(5): 332-334.
[14] 南京水利科学研究院. SL237-1999土工试验规程[S]. 北京: 水利水电出版社, 1999.
[15] 杨勇超. 宁波软土一维固结特性及微观机理研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
[16] 申海娥, 孙德安, 陈波. 苏州黏土的力学特性[J]. 上海大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 17(2): 209-215.
[17] Tavenas, F., Jean, P., Leblond, P. and Leroueil, S. (1983) The Permeability of Natural Softclays. Part II: Permeability Characteristics. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20, 645-660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 龙凡, 王立忠, 李凯, 李玲玲. 舟山黏土和温州黏土灵敏度差别成因[J]. 浙江大学学报: 工学版, 2015, 49(2): 218-224.
[19] 王文军, 刘用海, 朱向荣. 宁波海相软土工程特性研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2008(10): 19-24.