我国证券法域外适用问题探究
Research on the Extraterritorial Application of Securities Law
摘要:
在证券市场全球化的背景下,我国《证券法》增设了域外适用条款,意在提高跨境证券监管水平,同时反制外国不恰当的证券域外管辖,但该条款的用语过于宽泛,留下了较多立法空白,难以有效指导我国证券法的域外适用。美国作为发达的证券市场国家,有较为完备的证券域外适用规则,我国可以考虑借鉴美国的相关经验,增加我国证券法域外适用条款的明确性和可适用性。
Abstract:
In the context of the globalization
of the securities market, our country’s Securities Law has added
extraterritorial provisions to purify the investment environment of the
cross-border securities market, and at the same time counter the inappropriate
extraterritorial jurisdiction of foreign securities. However, this provision is
too broad, leaving many legislative blanks, and it is difficult to effectively
guide the extraterritorial application of my country’s securities law. As a
developed country that has mature stock market, the United States has
relatively complete securities extraterritorial applicable rules. Our country
can consider learning from the relevant experience of the United States to
increase the clarity and applicability of the extraterritorial applicable
provisions of my country’s securities laws.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张迈. 中国《证券法》的域外管辖标准及其适用条件[J]. 金融法苑, 2020(4): 40-58.
|
|
[2]
|
宋晓. 域外管辖的体系构造: 立法管辖与司法管辖之界分[J]. 法学研究, 2021, 43(3): 171-191.
|
|
[3]
|
彭岳. 美国证券法域外管辖的最新发展及其启示[J]. 现代法学, 2011, 11(6): 139-147.
|
|
[4]
|
崔景隆. 我国证券法域外管辖权法律制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 保定: 河北大学, 2021.
|
|
[5]
|
曹明. 我国证券域外管辖规则构建研究——以瑞幸咖啡财务造假事件为切入点[J]. 南方金融, 2021(2): 79-87.
|
|
[6]
|
邓建平, 牟纹慧. 瑞幸事件与新《证券法》的域外管辖权[J]. 财会月刊, 2020(12): 135-139.
|
|
[7]
|
唐鑫江. 证券法的域外效力[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2021.
|
|
[8]
|
邱润根. 证券跨境交易的监管模式研究[J]. 当代法学, 2006, 20(2): 144-151.
|
|
[9]
|
钱学峰. 世界证券市场的日益国际化与美国证券法的域外管辖权(下) [J]. 法学评论, 1994(5): 54-74.
|
|
[10]
|
肖永平. “长臂管辖权”的法理分析与对策研究[J]. 中国法学, 2019(6): 52.
|
|
[11]
|
冷静. 新《证券法》“域外管辖条款”适用的相关问题[J]. 地方立法研究, 2021(4): 11-17.
|