酶蛋白质中8类二级结构的识别
Indentification of 8-State Secondary Structure in Enzymes Protein
DOI: 10.12677/HJBM.2021.114027, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 高苏娟:内蒙古工业大学理学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 酶蛋白质蛋白质二级结构矩阵打分Enzyme Protein Protein Secondary Structure Scoring Matrix
摘要: 酶是一种具有催化功能的蛋白质,研究酶蛋白质中的二级结构对研究酶的结构及功能有重要作用。本文从酶蛋白质序列出发,以位点氨基酸和20种氨基酸n-gap 2肽组分为参数,首次将矩阵打分的方法用于酶蛋白质中8类二级结构的识别,预测总精度Q8最高达到61.4%。
Abstract: Enzymes are a kind of protein that has catalytic function. The study of secondary structures in en-zymes plays an important role in the structure and function of enzymes. Based on enzyme protein sequence information, amino acids of sites and n-gap dipeptide composition of twenty amino acids were selected as parameters. Scoring matrix method was first applied to the identification of 8-state secondary structure in enzymes protein. The prediction accuracy of Q8 reached 61.4%.
文章引用:高苏娟. 酶蛋白质中8类二级结构的识别[J]. 生物医学, 2021, 11(4): 214-219. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJBM.2021.114027

参考文献

[1] Chandonia, J.M. and Karplus, M. (1996) The Importance of Larger Datasets for Protein Secondary Structure Prediction with Neural Network. Protein Science, 5, 768-774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Anders, K. and Lareo, R. (1994) Hidden Markov Models in Computational Biology Applications to Protein Modeling. Journal of Molecular Biology, 235, 1501-1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Asai, K., Hayamizu, S. and Hands, K. (1993) Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure by the Hidden Markov Model. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 9, 141-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Goldman, N., Thorne, J.L. and Jones, D.T. (1996) Using Evolutionary Trees in Protein Secondary Structure Prediction and Other Comparative Sequence Analyses. Journal of Molecular Biology, 263, 196-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Rost, B. and Sander, C. (1994) Combining Evolutionary Information and Neural Networks to Predict Protein Secondary Structure. Proteins, 19, 55-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Dor, O. and Zhou, Y.Q. (2007) Achieving 80% Ten-Fold Cross-Validated Accuracy for Secondary Structure Prediction by Large-Scale Training. Protein, 66, 838-845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Pollastri, G. and Mclysaght, A. (2005) Porter: A New, Accurate Server for Protein Secondary Structure Prediction. Bioinformatics, 21, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Pollastri, G., Przybylski, D., Rost, B. and Baldi, P. (2002) Improving the Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure in Three and Eight Classes Using Recurrent Neural Networks and Profiles. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics, 47, 228-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Wang, Z.Y., Zhao, F., Peng, J. and Xu, J.B. (2011) Protein 8-Class Secondary Structure Prediction Using Conditional Neural Fields. Proteomics, 11, 3786-3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Cong, P.S., Li, D.P., Wang, Z.H., Tang, S.N. and Li, T.H. (2013) SPSSM8: An Accurate Approach for Predicting Eight-State Secondary Structures of Proteins. Biochimie, 95, 2460-2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Yaseen, A. and Li, Y.H. (2014) Template-Based C8-SCORPION: A Protein 8-State Secondary Structure Prediction Method Using Structural Information and Context-Based Features. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 204-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 王志强, 董彩华, 王延枝. 温度和底物对大豆液泡膜H+-ATPase二级结构的影响[J]. 生物物理学报, 2000, 16(3): 489-493.
[13] 王玮, 葛毅强, 陈颖, 徐幸莲, 周光宏. 超高压对高铁肌红蛋白还原酶活性及二级结构的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 2015, 15(10): 134-140.
[14] Webb, E.C. (1992) Enzyme Nomenclature. Academic Press, San Diego.
[15] Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of Protein Secondary Structure: Pattern Recognition of Hydrogen Bonded and Geometrical Features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Cartharius, K., Frech, K., Grote, K., et al. (2005) Mat Inspector and Beyond: Promoter Analysis Based on Transcription Factor Binding Sites. Bioinformatics, 21, 2933-2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Quandt, K., Frech, K., Karas, H., et al. (1995) MatIand and Mat Inspector: New Fast and Versatile Tools for Deteciono Consensus Matches in Nucleotide Sequence Data. Nucleic Acids Research, 23, 4878-4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Kel, A.E., GoBling, E., Reuter, I., et al. (2003) MATCHTM: A Tool for Searching Transcription Factor Binding Sites in DNA Sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 3576-3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Wasserman, W.W. and Sandelin, A. (2004) Applied Bioinformatics for the Identification of Regulatory Elements. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 276-287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Zhong, L. and Johnson, W.C. (1992) Environment Affects Amino Acid Preference for Secondary Structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 4462-4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Lakizadeh, A. and Marashi, S.A. (2009) Addition of Contact Number Information Can Improve Protein Secondary Structure Prediction by Neural Networks. EXCLI Journal, 8, 66-73.
[22] Macdonald, J.R. and Johnson, W.C. (2001) Environmental Features Are Important in Determining Protein Secondary Structure. Protein Science, 10, 1172-1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Costantini, S., Colonna, G. and Facchiano, A.M. (2006) Amino Acid Propensities for Secondary Structures Are Influenced by the Protein Structural Class. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication, 342, 441-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Marash, S.A., Behrouzi, R. and Pezehk, H. (2007) Adaptation of Proteins to Different Environments: A Comparison of Proteome Structural Properties in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 244, 127-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]