思维导图引领对分课堂思维对话——以“大学语文”课程为例
Mind Map Leads the Thinking Dialogue in PAD Class—Taking “College Chinese” Course as an Example
摘要:
对分课堂自提出以来就备受关注,其过程包括讲授(Presentation)、内化和吸收(Assimilation)、讨论(Discussion)三个环节。讨论即思维对话,其特点具有延时性、预备性以及“亮考帮”。将思维导图应用于对分课堂讨论环节,能够有效促进思维整理与思维激发。以“大学语文”课程为例,从启迪思维发散、辅助思维对话、记录讨论过程、呈现讨论结果四个方面探讨思维导图在对分课堂讨论环节的应用。教学实践结果表明,思维导图能够引领对分课堂思维对话,激活课堂生命活力,是课程教学改革与考核评价的创新之举。
Abstract:
PAD class has attracted much attention since it was proposed. Its process includes three links: presentation, internalization and absorption, and discussion. Discussion is thinking dialogue, which is characterized by delay, preparation, and “the biggest gain, have a quiz for you and help me”. The application of mind mapping in the discussion of PAD class can effectively promote the sorting and stimulation of thinking. Taking “College Chinese” course as an example, this paper discusses the application of mind mapping in PAD Class discussion from four aspects: enlightening thinking divergence, assisting thinking dialogue, recording the discussion process and presenting the discussion results. The results of teaching practice show that mind mapping can lead the thinking dialogue in PAD class and activate the vitality of classroom life. It is an innovative move of curriculum teaching reform and assessment.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张学新. 对分课堂: 中国教育的新智慧[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 23-24.
|
|
[2]
|
李夫明. 对分课堂下高效讨论的路径分析——以《抽样调查》课程为例[J]. 科技视界, 2018(35): 78-79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
张晓燕.生成性教学实践路径探索——基于“对分课堂”的大学语文教学模式探究[J]. 新疆教育学院学报, 2019, 35(1): 71-75.
|
|
[4]
|
田艳. “对分课堂”在《大学语文》教学中的应用[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2018, 17(13): 203-204.
|
|
[5]
|
栗军. 新媒体时代下大学语文教学实践探索[J]. 汉字文化, 2017(17): 22-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
东尼•博赞, 著. 思维导图——放射性思维[M]. 李斯, 译. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 2004: 59.
|
|
[7]
|
东尼•博赞, 著. 思维导图[M]. 卜煜婷, 译. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2016: 33.
|
|
[8]
|
赵国庆. 概念图、思维导图教学应用若干重要问题的探讨[J]. 电化教育研究, 2012, 33(5): 78-84.
|
|
[9]
|
杜玉霞, 贺卫国, 杜文棐. 思维导图: 如何学 如何用 如何教[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2020.
|
|
[10]
|
鸿雁. 思维导图[M]. 长春: 吉林文史出版社, 2018: 13.
|