轻度认知障碍患者听觉范式诱发脑电P300电位的病例对照研究
Auditory Paradigm Evoked P300 Potentials in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): A Case-Control Study
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.119252, PDF,   
作者: 宋伟东, 胡晓辉:深圳市南山区慢性病防治院精神卫生科,广东 深圳;吴东辉*, 谢国华:深圳市康宁医院/深圳市精神卫生中心老年精神科记忆门诊,广东 深圳;王承敏:深圳市龙岗区慢性病防治院精神卫生科,广东 深圳
关键词: 轻度认知障碍听觉诱发电位P300病例对照研究Mild Cognitive Impairment Auditory Evoked Potentials P300 Case-Control Study
摘要: 背景:轻度认知障碍(Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI)的早期识别是获得理想治疗效果及延缓其进展为痴呆的关键。本研究利用事件相关电位(Event Related Potentials, ERPs)脑电技术检测MCI受试的听觉范式诱发P300电位,发现可能用于临床早期识别MCI的脑电电位指标。方法:研究主要在深圳市康宁医院记忆门诊和社区使用临床痴呆评定量表(Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR)的访谈评分作为标准招募MCI患者和对照受试,在完成人口统计学资料收集及相关神经心理测量问卷后采用ERP脑电技术的方法检测受试的听觉范式诱发P300电位,同时在Fz,Cz和Pz采集P300潜伏期和波幅。结果:研究一共招募受试51位受试完成听觉范式诱发P300电位采集,其中MCI受试24位,对照受试27位。MCI受试在简易智能检查量表(Min-Mental State Examination, MMSE)及蒙特利尔认知评估(Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA)的认知测评上得分均低于对照受试(分别为27.6 ± 2.0比29.0 ± 1.2和22.6 ± 2.2比26.9 ± 2.0,P ≤ 0.01),其P300诱发电位在Fz部位波幅低于对照受试者(3.6 ± 4.8比7.9 ± 6.3,P = 0.01),并且受试Fz部位波幅的降低与MoCA的测评得分存在正相关(相关系数为0.30,P = 0.04)。结论:MCI患者P300诱发电位在Fz部位的波幅降低可能成为临床早期识别MCI脑电指标。
Abstract: Background: Early recognition of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the key to obtain the ideal therapeutic effect and delay its progression to dementia. This study used event-related potentials (ERPs) technology to detect the auditory paradigm evoked P300 potentials of MCI patients, and expected to prove that ERPs indicators might be used to identify MCI in the early clinical stage. Methods: The study mainly used the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) interview scores both in the memory clinic of Shenzhen Kangning Hospital and in the community as the standard to recruit MCI patients and control subjects, respectively. After completing the collection of demographic data and neuropsychological assessments, the ERPs technique was used to detect the auditory paradigm evoked P300 potential, which latency and amplitude were collected at Fz, Cz and Pz. Results: The study recruited a total of 51 subjects to complete the auditory paradigm evoked P300 potential acquisition, of which 24 were MCI subjects and 27 were control subjects. The scores of MCI subjects on the cognitive assessment of Min-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were lower than those of control subjects (27.6 ± 2.0 vs. 29.0 ± 1.2, 22.6 ± 2.2 vs. 26.9 ± 2.0, respectively, P ≤ 0.01). At the Fz site, the P300 amplitude of MCI patients was lower, when compared to the P300 amplitude of control subjects (3.6 ± 4.8 vs. 7.9 ± 6.3, P = 0.01). The reduction in the amplitude of the Fz site was positively correlated with the MoCA score in MCI patients (r = 0.30, P = 0.04). Conclusion: The reduced amplitude of P300 evoked potential at Fz site in MCI patients may be an indicator of early clinical identification of MCI.
文章引用:宋伟东, 吴东辉, 王承敏, 胡晓辉, 谢国华 (2021). 轻度认知障碍患者听觉范式诱发脑电P300电位的病例对照研究. 心理学进展, 11(9), 2216-2224. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.119252

参考文献

[1] 韩学青, 冯锋, 陈建, 尚兰, 李娟(2005). 日常生活能力量表辅助诊断痴呆值的界定. 中国组织工程研究, 9(37), 13-15.
[2] 刘杰, 王瑛, 王晓慧, 宋瑞华, 易晓宏(2013). 中文版老年抑郁量表在城市社区老年人群中应用的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(1), 39-41.
[3] 彭丹涛, 许贤豪, 刘江红, 矫玉娟, 张华, 殷剑, 等(2005). 简易智能精神状态检查量表检测老年期痴呆患者的应用探讨. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志, 12(4), 187-190.
[4] 王炜, 王鲁宁(2007). “蒙特利尔认知评估量表”在轻度认知损伤患者筛查中的应用. 中华内科杂志, 46(5), 414-416.
[5] 张立秀, 刘雪琴(2007). 蒙特利尔认知评估量表中文版的信效度研究. 护理研究, 21(11), 2906-2907.
[6] Arevalo-Rodriguez, I., Smailagic, N., Roqué I Figuls, M., Ciapponi, A., Sanchez-Perez, E., Giannakou, A., Pedraza, O. L., Bonfill Cosp, X., & Cullum, S. (2015). Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias in People with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 3, CD010783.[CrossRef
[7] Blackwood, D. H., Whalley, L. J., Christie, J. E., Blackburn, I. M., St Clair, D. M., & McInnes, A. (1987). Changes in Auditory P3 Event-Related Potential in Schizophrenia and Depression. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 150, 154-160.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Etgen, T., Sander, D., Bickel, H., & Förstl, H. (2011). Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: The Importance of Modifiable Risk Factors. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 108, 743-750.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State. A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Gozke, E., Tomrukcu, S., & Erdal, N. (2013). Visual Event-Related Potentials in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. International Journal of Gerontology, 10, 190-192.
[11] Horvath, A., Szucs, A., Csukly, G., Sakovics, A., Stefanics, G., & Kamondi, A. (2018). EEG and ERP Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Critical Review. Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark edition), 23, 183-220.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lai, C. L., Lin, R. T., Liou, L. M., & Liu, C. K. (2010). The Role of Event-Related Potentials in Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 121, 194-199.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. The Gerontologist, 9, 179-186.[CrossRef
[14] Li, X., Shao, X., Wang, N., Wang, T., Chen, G., & Zhou, H. (2010). Correlation of Auditory Event-Related Potentials and Magnetic resonance Spectroscopy Measures in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Brain Research, 1346, 204-212.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Lin, K. N., & Liu, H. C. (2003). Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Chinese Version. Acta Neurologica Taiwanica, 12, 154-165.
[16] Linden D. E. (2005). The p300: Where in the Brain Is It Produced and What Does It Tell Us? The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology. Neurology and Psychiatry, 11, 563-576.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Medvidovic, S., Titlic, M., & Maras-Simunic, M. (2013). P300 Evoked Potential in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Acta Informatica Medica: AIM: Journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina: Casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 21, 89-92.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Morrison, C., Rabipour, S., Knoefel, F., Sheppard, C., & Taler, V. (2018). Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 15, 702-715.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695-699.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Papaliagkas, V. T., Kimiskidis, V. K., Tsolaki, M. N., & Anogianakis, G. (2009). Po22-th-10 Diagnostic Accuracy of Event-Related Potentials in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 285, S276-S276.[CrossRef
[21] Papaliagkas, V. T., Kimiskidis, V. K., Tsolaki, M. N., & Anogianakis, G. (2011). Cognitive Event-Related Potentials: Longitudinal Changes in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 122, 1322-1326.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Papaliagkas, V., Kimiskidis, V., Tsolaki, M., & Anogianakis, G. (2008). Usefulness of Event-Related Potentials in the Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 107.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Razali, R., Jean-Li, L., Jaffar, A., Ahmad, M., Shah, S. A., Ibrahim, N., Din, N. C., Nik Jaafar, N. R., Midin, M., Sidi, H., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Is the Bahasa Malaysia Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BM) a Better Instrument than the Malay Version of the Mini Mental State Examination (M-MMSE) in Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in the Elderly? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55, S70-S75.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Shen, X. N., Niu, L. D., Wang, Y. J., Cao, X. P., Liu, Q., Tan, L., Zhang, C., & Yu, J. T. (2019). Inflammatory Markers in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of 170 Studies. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 90, 590-598.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Tandon, O. P., & Kumar, S. (1993). P3 Event Related Cerebral Evoked Potential in Chronic Pain Patients. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 37, 51-55.
[26] Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V., Fratiglioni, L., Wahlund, L. O., Nordberg, A., Bäckman, L., Albert, M., Almkvist, O., Arai, H., Basun, H., Blennow, K., de Leon, M., DeCarli, C., Erkinjuntti, T., Giacobini, E., Graff, C., Hardy, J., Jack, C., Petersen, R. C. et al. (2004). Mild Cognitive Impairment—Beyond Controversies, towards a Consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240-246.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Winkler, I., Denham, S., & Escera, C. (2013) Auditory Event-Related Potentials. In D. Jaeger, & R. Jung (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience (p. 2). Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982). Development and Validation of a Geriatric Depression Screening Scale: A Preliminary Report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37-49.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Yu, J. T., Xu, W., Tan, C. C., Andrieu, S., Suckling, J., Evangelou, E., Pan, A., Zhang, C., Jia, J., Feng, L., Kua, E. H., Wang, Y. J., Wang, H. F., Tan, M. S., Li, J. Q., Hou, X. H., Wan, Y., Tan, L., Mok, V., Tan, L., Vellas, B. et al. (2020). Evidence- Based Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 243 Observational Prospective Studies and 153 Randomised Controlled Trials. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 91, 1201-1209.[CrossRef] [PubMed]