含水率和应力水平对粉质黏土动力性能影响研究
Effect of Moisture Content and Stress Level on Dynamic Performance of Silty Clay
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2021.109100, PDF,   
作者: 黄贝贝, 刘依依, 李景磊, 蒋红光*:山东大学齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南;马川义, 王 凯:山东高速集团有限公司,山东 济南
关键词: 动三轴试验粉质黏土动态回弹模量应力水平Dynamic Triaxial Test Silty Clay Dynamic Resilient Modulus Stress Level
摘要: 基于室内动三轴试验,对不同含水率、不同应力水平下土体动态回弹模量和长期变形特性进行了研究。结果表明:增大围压、减小含水率可有效提高动态回弹模量。其中,动态回弹模量随着偏应力比(即附加应力与围压比)的增加而呈指数式衰减;同时土体塑性变形随着振次的增加逐渐累加,荷载水平较低时,塑性变形发展速率比较缓慢,而当荷载水平较高时,塑性变形发展速率明显增加。
Abstract: The dynamic resilient modulus and long-term deformation characteristics of soil under different water contents and different stress levels were studied through indoor dynamic triaxial tests. The results show that increasing confining pressure and reducing water content can effectively improve the dynamic resilient modulus. The dynamic resilient modulus decreases exponentially with the increase of deviatoric stress ratio (the ratio of additional stress to confining pressure). At the same time, the plastic deformation of soil gradually accumulates with the increase of vibration times. When the load level is low, the development rate of plastic deformation is slow, and when the load level is high, the development rate of plastic deformation increases significantly. When the compaction degree is 94%, the optimal moisture content is 20%, and the plastic deformation is the smallest, which can be used to guide the subgrade design.
文章引用:黄贝贝, 马川义, 刘依依, 王凯, 李景磊, 蒋红光. 含水率和应力水平对粉质黏土动力性能影响研究[J]. 土木工程, 2021, 10(9): 882-893. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2021.109100

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国行业标准. JTG D30-2015, 公路路基设计规范[S].
[2] 钱劲松, 王朋, 凌建明, 等. 潮湿多雨地区高速公路路基湿度的实测特征[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(12): 1812-1817.
[3] 林小平, 李兴华, 凌建明, 等. 路基土回弹模量湿度调整系数预估研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(10): 1490-1494.
[4] 凌建明, 陈声凯, 曹长伟. 路基土回弹模量影响因素分析[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2007, 10(4): 446-451.
[5] Lekarp, F., Isacsson, U. and Dawson, A. (2000) State of the Art. I: Resilient Response of Unbound Aggregates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126, 102-113.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 董城, 冷伍明, 李志勇. 粉土动态回弹模量试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012(12): 4834-4839.
[7] Khoury, N., Brooks, R., Boeni, S.Y., et al. (2013) Variation of Resilient Modulus, Strength, and Modulus of Elasticity of Stabilized Soils with Postcompaction Moisture Contents. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25, 160-166.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 李志勇, 董城, 邹静蓉, 等. 湘南地区红黏土动态回弹模量试验与预估模型研究[J]. 岩石力学, 2015, 36(7): 1840-1846.
[9] Thompson, M.R. and Robnett, Q.L. (1979) Resilient Properties of Subgrade Soils. Transportation Engineering Journal, 105, 71-89.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Janoo, V.C. and Bayer II, J.J. (2006) The Effect of Aggregate Angularity on Base Course Performance. U.S. Army.
[11] 蒋红光, 曹让, 马晓燕, 等. 考虑路基平衡湿度状态的黄泛区中高液限黏土抗剪强度研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(12): 2819-2828.