中职生问题行为状况及干预策略研究
A Study on Problem Behavior and Intervention Strategies of Secondary Vocational School Students
摘要: 采用青少年问题行为自评问卷对280名中职生进行调查。结果发现:1. 问题行为总均分在1.94,小于2,说明中职生总体问题行为状况较好,各个维度总均分由高到低排序为:学习适应不良 > 考试焦虑 > 神经质 > 攻击行为 > 退缩 > 违纪行为。2. 问题行为检出率为11.4%,各维度检出率由高到低依次为:考试焦虑 > 神经质 > 退缩 > 学习适应不良 > 攻击行为 > 违纪行为。3. 中职生问题行为在性别上,男女生无显著差异。4. 独生子女的问题行为显著高于非独生子女。5. 城市生源学生的问题行为低于农村生源学生。基于中职生问题行为的总体状况、检出率、性别差异、独生子女与否差异、居住地差异的具体特点进行了分析,据此有针对性地提出干预对策和建议,以期能对中职生的教育及人才培养工作提供现实的指导意义。
Abstract:
A total of 280 secondary vocational school students were investigated by “Problem Behavior Self-Rating Questionnaire for Adolescent”. The results showed that: 1. The total average score of problem behavior was 1.94, which was less than 2, indicating that the overall problem behavior status of secondary vocational students was relatively good. The total average score of each di-mension was ranked from high to low: learning maladaptive > test-anxiety > neurotic > aggressive behavior > withdraw > delinquent behavior. 2. The detection rate of problem behavior was 11.4%, and the detection rate of each dimension was ranked from high to low: test-anxiety > neurotic > withdraw > learning maladaptive > aggressive behavior > delinquent behavior. 3. There was no significant difference between male and female students in the problem behavior of secondary vocational students. 4. The problem behavior of only child was significantly higher than that of non-only child. 5. The problem behavior of urban students is lower than that of rural students. Based on the overall status of the problem behavior of secondary vocational students, the detection rate, gender differences, differences in only child or non-only child, and differences in residence, the intervention strategies and suggestions were put forward to improve the education and talent training work to provide practical guidance.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
教育部. 2017年全国教育事业发展统计公报[J]. 云南教育(视界时政版), 2018(8): 29-33.
|
|
[2]
|
廖艳华. 近十年来我国儿童问题行为研究现状[J]. 浙江教育学院学报, 2007(6): 33-37, 62.
|
|
[3]
|
郑晓华, 周莉. 学生问题行为成因及对策[J]. 教育, 2020(32): 61.
|
|
[4]
|
崔丽霞, 郑日昌. 中学生问题行为多视角评估的构想效度[J]. 心理科学, 2007, 30(1): 181-184.
|
|
[5]
|
马慧芳, 马海林, 罗桑平措. 藏族大学生问题行为状况调查[J]. 长春大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 24(4): 1067-1070, 1090.
|
|
[6]
|
厦门便民网. 厦门中考升学率是多少? 厦门中考升学率排名一览表[EB/OL].
http://m.xmbmw123.com/rxgl/4062.html, 2020-11-16.
|
|
[7]
|
丁玲. 中职生的学习适应性及与自我控制能力的关系[J]. 教育界, 2014(4): 163-164.
|
|
[8]
|
宋战伟. 中职生学习适应性研究与对策[J]. 魅力中国, 2010(13): 338.
|
|
[9]
|
张阿敏, 徐大真. 中职生问题行为及其与社会支持关系的调查报告[J]. 职业技术教育, 2013(1): 67-72.
|
|
[10]
|
刘立祯, 蒋卓勤. 赣州某学校中职护生护考考试焦虑的调查与干预研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 中山大学, 2013.
|
|
[11]
|
付鑫. 浅析手机网络对青少年心理健康的影响与对策[J]. 文化创新比较研究, 2018(23): 59, 64.
|
|
[12]
|
高秋爽, 张琳, 张思凡, 陈亮. 不良同伴交往与中职生的问题行为: 性别的调节作用[J]. 青少年学刊, 2019(3): 23-30.
|
|
[13]
|
温永会, 郝丽娟, 王丽凤. 对中职学校独生子女感恩教育的初探[J]. 魅力中国, 2020(45): 358.
|
|
[14]
|
李建华, 周路平, 方奇, 袁谦. 进城务工家庭随迁子女早期问题行为的调查[J]. 长沙大学学报, 2013, 27(6): 144-145, 154.
|
|
[15]
|
涂晓琴, 谢晰君, 陈艳. 中职学生自我同一性、职业成熟度现状的研究[J]. 广东技术师范大学学报, 2021, 42(1): 68-73.
|
|
[16]
|
林崇德. 中国优生优育优教百科全书: 优教卷[M]. 广州: 广东教育出版社, 2000.
|