大学生媒体多任务与内隐学习关系研究
Relationship between Media Multitasking and Implicit Learning in College Students
摘要: 采用《媒体使用情况调查问卷》对大学生媒体多任务情况进行调查,发放问卷85份,有效问卷80份,将MMI指数高于平均数一个标准差的被试定义为高媒体多任务者,MMI指数低于平均数一个标准差的被试定义为低媒体多任务者,其余为中媒体多任务者。本实验采用3 (媒体多任务者类型:高、中、低) × 4 (场景类型:完全重复、布局重复、特征重复和新异条件) × 5 (时间阶段:1~5)的混合实验设计,探究高、中、低媒体多任务者的内隐学习是否存在差异以及三者在内隐学习方式上是否存在差异。结果表明,高、中、低媒体多任务者的内隐学习程度没有显著差异。但是在内隐学习方式上,中、低媒体多任务者的内隐学习既依赖于场景的空间信息也依赖于特征信息,高媒体多任务者的内隐学习只依赖于场景的空间信息。
Abstract: The media Use Questionnaire was used to investigate the media multitasking situation of college students, and 85 questionnaires were issued, of which 80 were valid. Media multitasking index higher than the average one standard deviation is defined as high media multitasking, lower than the average one standard deviation is defined as low media multitasking, the rest for the media multitasking. In this study, a mixed experimental design of 3 (media multitaskers: high, medium and low) × 4 (scene types: combined repetition, configuration repetition, identity repetition and new) × 5 (epoch: 1~5) was adopted to explore whether there are differences in the implicit learning of high, medium and low media multitaskers and whether there are differences in the implicit learning methods of the three. The results show that there is no significant difference in the degree of implicit learning among high, medium and low media multitaskers. In addition, the implicit learning of medium and high media multitaskers depends on both the configuration information and identity information of the scene, while the implicit learning of low media multitaskers only depends on the configuration information of the scene.
文章引用:苏钰杰. 大学生媒体多任务与内隐学习关系研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(9): 2727-2735. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.109373

参考文献

[1] 刘晨. 大学生媒体多任务行为对中央执行系统的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2015.
[2] 刘晨, 孔繁昌, 周宗奎. 从一心一意到三心二意: 青少年的媒体多任务行为[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(5): 1132-1139.
[3] 夏婵娟. 媒体多任务及社交网站使用对认知能力的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2014.
[4] 杨晓辉, 朱莉琪. 大学生的媒体多任务操作与个性及不良情绪[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2014, 28(4): 277-282.
[5] Ophir, E., Nass, C. and Wagner, A.D. (2009) Cognitive Control in Media Multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15583-15587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R.F., Forster, G. and Vohs, K.D. (2012) Everyday Temptations: An Experience Sampling Study of Desire, Conflict, and Self-Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318-1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Rogers, Y. (2009) The Changing Face of Human-Computer Interaction in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. In: Holzinger, A. and Miesenberger, K., Eds., USAB 2009, LNCS 5889, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Blakemore, C. and VanSluyters, R.C. (1975) Innate and Environmental Factors in the Development of the Kitten’s Visual Cortex. Journal of Physiology, 248, 663-716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Broadbent, D.E. (1958) Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press, New York. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Deutsch, J.A. and Deutsch, D. (1963) Attention: Some Theoretical Considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Salvucci, D.D. and Taatgen, N.A. (2011) The Multitasking Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[12] Treisman, A.M. (1960) Contextual Cues in Selective Listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 243-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Cain, M.S. and Mitroff, S.R. (2011) Distractor Filtering in Media Multitaskers. Perception, 40, 1183-1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Lui, K.F. and Wong, A.C. (2012) Does Media Multitasking Always Hurt? A Positive Correlation between Multitasking and Multisensory Integration. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 647-653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Uncapher, M.R., Thieu, M.K. and Wagner, A.D. (2016) Media Multitasking and Memory: Differences in Working Memory and Long-Term Memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 483-490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Edwards, K.S. and Shin, M. (2017) Media Multitasking and Implicit Learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1535-1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 李晓杰. 视觉搜索任务中背景线索效应的产生机制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2016.
[18] 宋晨. 空间信息的内隐学习: 自我参照还是环境参照? [D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2017.
[19] 王雨薇. 空间参照系对成年人和7-11岁儿童背景线索效应的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2018.
[20] 臧雪莲, 张笑笑. 选择性注意机制在情景线索效应中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1503-1511.
[21] Brockmole, J.R., Castelhano, M.S. and Henderson, J.M. (2006) Contextual Cueing in Naturalistic Scenes: Global and Local Contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 699-706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Rosenbaum, G.M. and Jiang, Y.V. (2013) Interaction between Scene-Based and Array-Based Contextual Cueing. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 75, 888-899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Lleras, A. and von Mühlenen, A. (2004) Spatial Context and Top-Down Strategies in Visual Search. Spatial Vision, 17, 465-482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]