中国大学生感觉处理敏感度现状：性别与文化差异

Sensory Processing Sensitivity among Chinese College Students: Gender and Cultural Difference

摘要: 目的：修订《感觉处理敏感度量表(中文版)》，分析跨文化背景下大学生感觉处理敏感度的差异。方法：采用《感觉处理敏感度量表》及中国大五人格问卷简版中的神经质人格维度对3090名大学生进行调查。结果：1) 经项目分析与验证性因子分析，剔除题项6、18、20、27，形成《感觉处理敏感度量表(中文版)》。验证性因子分析显示，一阶四因子的结构与内容更为合理(χ2(df = 224, N = 311) = 540.68，P < 0.01，χ2/df = 2.41 < 3.00，REMSEA = 0.07)。信度分析显示总量表及其四因子的Cronbach α系数为0.90、0.71、0.74、0.86、0.72，总量表半分信度系数为0.83。2) 中国大学生(3.51 ± 0.78)普遍比美国大学生(3.95 ± 1.06)感觉处理敏感度更高，中国女大学生(3.44 ± 0.77)普遍比中国男大学生(3.66 ± 0.80)感觉处理敏感度更高。结论：《感觉处理敏感度量表(中文版)》是比较可靠和有效的测试人格结构的量表，但在研究感觉处理敏感度相关问题时应考虑文化差异及性别差异。

Abstract: Objective: Revised Highly Sensitive Person Scale (Chinese version) and analyzed the differences of College Students’ sensory processing sensitivity under the cross-cultural background. Methods: 3090 college students were investigated with Highly Sensitive Person Scale and the Neuroticism Dimension of the Chinese Big Five Personality Questionnaire. Results: 1) after item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, items 6, 18, 20 and 27 were eliminated and finally Highly Sensitive Person Scale (Chinese version) was formed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that four factors were more reasonable (χ2 (df = 224, N = 311) = 540.68, P < 0.01, χ2/df = 2.41 < 3.00, REMSEA = 0.07). The reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach of the total scale and its four factors’ Cronbach α were 0.90, 0.71, 0.74, 0.86 and 0.72, and the half split reliability coefficient was 0.83. 2) Chinese college students (3.51 ± 78) have higher sensory processing sensitivity than American college students (3.95 ± 1.06). Female college students (3.44 ± 0.77) have higher sensory processing sensitivity than male college students (3.66 ± 0.80) in China. Conclusion: Highly Sensitive Person Scale (Chinese version) was a reliable and effective scale. However, cultural differences and gender differences should be taken into account when studying the issues related to sensory processing sensitivity.