基于ECMWF细网格模式的伊宁市大雾预报方法研究
Research on Fog Forecast Method of Yining City Based on ECMWF Fine Grid Model
摘要: 利用2016~2020年逐日伊宁站雾观测数据、地面常规气象资料,对大雾天气进行分级统计,采用统计法分析伊宁市大雾的时间变化特征,通过相关分析法找出与大雾生消有密切关系的气象因子;用ECMWF细网格模式资料,利用等级分类和逐步回归法建立大雾预报模型。结果表明:1) 伊宁市大雾天气集中出现的月份是11月至次年2月,多发时段是21:00至次日12:00。2) 与大雾相关性高的因子为T850、T925、T925-2m和T2m及Td;地面相对湿度 < 87%、露点温度差T-Td > 4℃和地面风速 > 3.2 m/s不宜出现大雾天气。3) 用建立的伊宁市24 h大雾预报的多元回归方程,对2021年1月~3月大雾过程进行预报效果检验,0~2级雾的预报正确率 > 66%,预报正确率远高于空报率,3级的正确率为0、空报率为100%,级别越低正确率越高;各级雾的漏报率均 < 34%。检验效果较理想,具有较好的预报水平和较高的业务应用价值。
Abstract: Based on the daily fog observation data and ground routine meteorological data of Yining station from 2016 to 2020, the classification statistics of heavy fog weather were carried out. The temporal variation characteristics of heavy fog in Yining were analyzed by statistical method, and the meteorological factors closely related to the occurrence and elimination of heavy fog were found by correlation analysis method. Using ECMWF fine grid model data, the fog prediction model is established by hierarchical classification and stepwise regression method. The results showed that: 1) The fog weather in Yining City concentrated from November to February of the following year, and the frequent occurrence period was from 21:00 to 12:00 of the next day. 2) The factors highly correlated with fog were T850, T925, T925-2m, T2m and Td; Ground relative humidity < 87%, dew point temperature difference T-Td > 4˚C and surface wind speed > 3.2 m/s were not suitable for foggy weather. 3) The multiple regression equation of 24-hour heavy fog forecast in Yining City was used to test the prediction effect of heavy fog from January to March in 2021. The prediction accuracy of class 0 to class 2 fog forecast is more than 66%, and the accuracy is much higher than the empty forecast rate. The accuracy of class 3 fog forecast is 0 and the absent forecast rate is 100%, and the lower the class is, the higher the accuracy is. The missing rate of fog at all classes was less than 34%. The test effect is ideal, and it has better prediction level and higher operational application value.
文章引用:玛合巴•巴合提, 祝小梅, 沈晓辉. 基于ECMWF细网格模式的伊宁市大雾预报方法研究[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2021, 10(6): 563-569. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2021.106066

参考文献

[1] 马禹, 任宜勇, 陈春艳, 等. 40年来新疆雾的演变特征及大雾天气过程分析[J]. 干早区地理, 2005, 28(4): 474-478.
[2] 彭成海, 董延虎, 秦榕. 伊犁地区大雾的气候特征研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(2): 708-709.
[3] 冯蕾, 田华. 国内外雾预报技术研究进展[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 6(1): 74-81.
[4] 朱玉祥, 黄嘉佑, 丁一汇. 统计方法在数值模式中应用的若干新进展[J]. 气象, 2016, 42(4): 456-465.
[5] 马晓刚, 罗思维, 舒海燕, 等. 中国典型大雾落区基本概念模型的研究与建立[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2013, 29(1): 62-67.
[6] 杜娟, 李曼, 辛渝, 等. 2017年乌鲁木齐区域数值预报业务系统预报性能检验和评估[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2018, 12(6): 49-57.
[7] 毛程燕, 龚理卿, 陈江锋, 等. 浙江中西部大雾天气的气候特征及潜势预报方法[J]. 广东气象, 2018, 40(2): 10-13.
[8] 邓小丽, 林杨. 西安地区大雾天气的分析及预报[J]. 陕西气象, 2013(4): 21-25.
[9] 王楠, 朱蕾, 周建军, 等. 基于EC细网格产品在乌鲁木齐机场低能见度预测中的释用[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2020, 14(2): 81-89.
[10] 李云泉, 陆琛莉, 范晓红. 嘉兴市大雾预报方法[J]. 浙江气象, 2007, 28(1): 14-17.