上级发展性反馈对员工创新绩效的双路径影响研究
The Dual Path Influence Analysis of Supervisor Developmental Feedback on Employees’ Innovation Performance
摘要: 上级发展性反馈是员工创新的重要信息来源之一。现有文献多从上级发展性反馈的单维度来探讨对员工创新的作用机制。基于资源保存、社会交换以及社会认知理论，以领导成员交换和自我效能感为中介变量，将上级发展性反馈分为积极与消极两个维度，构建了上级发展性反馈对员工创新绩效的双路径模型，统计分析459位企业员工调查数据的结果表明，上级发展性反馈对领导成员交换、自我效能感以及创新绩效均有显著的正向作用，其中上级积极发展性反馈对各个变量的促进作用明显大于消极发展性反馈，领导成员交换和自我效能感在上级发展性反馈与创新绩效之间发挥部分中介作用。其研究成果不仅拓展了基于积极与消极两个维度的上级发展性反馈双路径影响研究视角，还对组织中管理者如何更有效地进行上级发展性反馈具有重要的指导意义。
Abstract: Supervisor developmental feedback is one of the important sources of information for employee innovation. The existing literature mostly discusses the mechanism of supervisor developmental feedback on employee innovation from a single dimension. Based on the theories of resource conservation, social exchange and social cognition, with the leader-member exchange and self-efficacy as mediators, supervisor developmental feedback is divided into positive and negative dimensions, and the two-path model of supervisor developmental feedback on employees’ innovation performance is constructed. According to the statistical analysis of the survey data from 459 employees, the results indicate that superior developmental feedback has a significant positive impact on the leader-member exchange, self-efficacy and innovative performance. Among them, the positive supervisor developmental feedback has obviously greater influence than that of the negative one, and the leader-member exchange and the self-efficacy play a part of the mediating role between the supervisor developmental feedback and the innovative performance. The findings of this research not only expand the perspective of research on two-path of supervisor developmental feedback, from positive and negative dimensions, but also provide important guidance for managers in the organization to conduct superior developmental feedback more effectively.
文章引用：戴钰婷, 余敬 (2021). 上级发展性反馈对员工创新绩效的双路径影响研究. 心理学进展, 11(11), 2486-2496. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.1111284

参考文献

[1] 楚啸原, 曾攀, 许俏, 赵惜雨, 雷雳(2021). 朋友支持与大学生幸福感: 自我效能感的中介与社会比较倾向的调节. 心理科学, 44(2), 426-432.
[2] 崔杨, 于桂兰(2019). 上级发展性反馈对员工创新绩效的影响机制研究. 管理现代化, 39(1), 37-40.
[3] 耿紫珍, 赵佳佳, 丁琳(2020). 中庸的智慧: 上级发展性反馈影响员工创造力的机理研究. 南开管理评论, 23(1), 75-86.
[4] 韩翼, 廖建桥, 龙立荣(2007). 雇员工作绩效结构模型构建与实证研究. 管理科学学报, (5), 62-77.
[5] 韩翼, 杨百寅, 张鹏程(2011). 组织承诺会导致创新: 目标定向的调节作用. 科学学研究, 29(1), 127-137.
[6] 何奇兵(2021). 双元压力与员工创新力的关系——有调节的中介模型. 技术与创新管理, 42(2), 170-176.
[7] 江静, 杨百寅(2014). 领导-成员交换、内部动机与员工创造力——工作多样性的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 35(1), 165-172.
[8] 李爱梅, 王笑天, 熊冠星, 李斌, 凌文辁(2015). 工作影响员工幸福体验的“双路径模型”探讨——基于工作要求-资源模型的视角. 心理学报, 47(5), 624-636.
[9] 李金龙(2021). 员工组织包容性感知对创新绩效的影响. 统计与决策, 37(7), 181-184.
[10] 凌淼, 余璇, 张芸子(2021). 人力资源管理强度对科技企业知识型员工创新绩效的影响. 科技进步与对策, 38(8), 153-160.
[11] 刘兵, 刘培琪(2020). 角色认同视角下上级发展性反馈对员工创新行为的影响机制. 财贸研究, 31(8), 77-86.
[12] 刘智强, 邓传军, 廖建桥, 龙立荣(2015). 组织支持、地位认知与员工创新: 雇佣多样性视角. 管理科学学报, 18(10), 80-94.
[13] 卢小君, 张国梁(2007). 工作动机对个人创新行为的影响研究. 软科学, (6), 124-127.
[14] 穆滢潭(2020). 家庭工作冲突与个人生活福祉——强化与支持非正式工作资源的观点. 财经研究, 46(10), 123-138.
[15] 苏伟琳, 林新奇(2019). 上级发展性反馈对员工建言行为影响的双路径分析——基于社会交换理论与社会认知理论的视角. 经济经纬, 36(5), 112-119.
[16] 苏伟琳, 林新奇(2020). 上级发展性反馈对下属知识共享的影响机制: 一个有调节的中介模型. 商业经济与管理, (10), 29-38.
[17] 田贵贤, 陶永朝(2021). 魅力型领导与新生代员工创新绩效关系研究——基于多重认同的链式中介模型. 萍乡学院学报, 38(1), 26-32.
[18] 王辉, 聂巧媛(2021). 包容性领导对员工创新行为的影响——员工信任和创新自我效能感的作用. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 14(29), 1-12.
[19] 徐本华, 邓传军, 武恒岳(2021). 领导成员交换与员工主动创新行为: 一个被中介的调节模型. 管理科学, 34(2), 44-55.
[20] 姚凯(2008). 自我效能感研究综述——组织行为学发展的新趋势. 管理学报, (3), 463-468.
[21] 尹晶, 郑兴山(2011). 上级反馈对员工创造力和组织公民行为的影响——领导-成员交换的中介作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 32(12), 153-159.
[22] 余嘉禾, 王碧英(2017). 谦卑型领导为何能提高员工绩效?领导-成员交换和组织自尊的多重中介作用. 中国人力资源开发, (10), 52-63.
[23] 张银普, 骆南峰, 石伟, 万金, 张译方, 杨小进(2020). 中国情境下领导-成员交换与绩效关系的元分析. 南开管理评论, 23(3), 177-187.
[24] 张振刚, 李云健, 余传鹏(2014). 员工的主动性人格与创新行为关系研究——心理安全感与知识分享能力的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 35(7), 171-180.
[25] 张振刚, 余传鹏, 李云健(2016). 主动性人格、知识分享与员工创新行为关系研究. 管理评论, 28(4), 123-133.
[26] 赵简, 张西超(2010). 工作压力与工作倦怠的关系——心理资本的调节作用. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 38(3), 139-143.
[27] 赵燕梅, 张正堂(2020). 服务型领导在组织创新氛围影响员工创新行为动力机制中的调节效应. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 127-141+191-192.
[28] 邹文篪, 田青, 刘佳(2012). “投桃报李”——互惠理论的组织行为学研究述评. 心理科学进展, 20(11), 1879-1888.
[29] Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-Regulation for Managerial Effectiveness: The Role of Active Feedback Seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251-280.[CrossRef] 
[30] Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.
[31] Daniels, J. A., & Larson, L. M. (2001). The Impact of Performance Feedback on Counseling Self-Efficacy and Counselor Anxiety. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 120-130.[CrossRef] 
[32] Dimotakis, N., Mitchell, D., & Maurer, T. (2017). Positive and Negative Assessment Center Feedback in Relation to Development Self-Efficacy, Feedback Seeking, and Promotion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 1514-1527.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Mul-ti-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.[CrossRef] 
[34] Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested-Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory. Applied Psychology, 50, 337-421.[CrossRef] 
[35] Hu, B., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Creative Self-Efficacy Mediates the Relationship between Knowledge Sharing and Employee Innovation. Social Behavior and Personality, 44, 815-826.[CrossRef] 
[36] Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of Individual Feedback on Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.[CrossRef] 
[37] Karl, K. A., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., & Martocchio, J. J. (1993). The Impact of Feedback and Self-Efficacy on Performance in Training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 379-394.[CrossRef] 
[38] Li, N., Harris, T. B., Boswell, W. R., & Xie, Z. (2011). The Role of Organizational Insiders’ Developmental Feedback and Proactive Personality on New Comers’ Performance: An Interactionist Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1317-1327.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Schwarzer, R., Babler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schroder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The Assessment of Optimistic Self-Beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese Versions of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 69-88.[CrossRef] 
[40] Zheng, X., Ismael, D., Yin, J., & Dan, S. C. (2015). Positive and Negative Supervisor Developmental Feedback and Task-Performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36, 212-232.[CrossRef] 
[41] Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback Valence, Feedback Style, Task Autonomy, and Achievement Orientation: Interactive Effects on Creative Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 261-276.
[42] Zhou, J. (2003). When the Presence of Creative Co-Workers Is Related to Creativity: Role of Supervisor Close Monitoring, Developmental Feedback, and Creative Personality. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413-422.[CrossRef] [PubMed]