公私法协动视角下的生态损害修复制度——以《民法典》第1234条为切入
Ecological Damage Restoration Mechanism from the Perspective of Coordinating Public Law and Private Law—Taking Article 1234 of the Civil Code as a Starting Point
摘要: 在本次《民法典》侵权责任编中,增设了与生态环境损害相关条款,其中,第1234条是对生态环境损害修复这一制度的创新性表述,是立足于传统私法构造下对于公法中类似制度的借鉴,从而明确修复责任的承担方式以及实现途径。条款中蕴涵的私法公法化趋向使得公益救济的制度引入出现学术分歧,探究公私法体系的衔接成为条款优化的可能研究思路。未来应当充分发挥公私法协同运作对于整合环境民事公益诉讼、生态环境损害赔偿制度的积极功效,逐步完善私法求偿与公法执行之间的平衡机制,使《民法典·侵权责任编》在公私合流大势中彰显时代特色。
Abstract: Article 1234 is an innovative formulation of the system of ecological damage restoration, which is based on the traditional private law structure and is a reference to similar systems in public law, so as to clarify the way to assume responsibility for restore and the way to achieve it. The tendency of publicizing private law in the article has led to academic disagreement on the introduction of a public interest remediation system, and exploring the interface between public and private law systems has become a possible research idea for optimizing the article. It is necessary to play a positive role in the synergy of public and private law, which integrate environmental civil public interest litigation and ecological damage compensation systems, and gradually improve the balance between private law claims and public law enforcement mechanisms, so that the Tort Liability Part of Civil Code will show the characteristics of the times in the general trend of public-private merging.
文章引用:罗伟轩. 公私法协动视角下的生态损害修复制度——以《民法典》第1234条为切入[J]. 争议解决, 2021, 7(4): 145-152. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2021.74019

参考文献

[1] 郑毓翰. 对现行生态修复制度的几点思考——兼议民法典第1234条[C]//上海市法学会. 《上海法学研究》集刊(2020年第11卷 总第35卷)——民法典文集. 上海: 上海市法学会, 2020: 7.
[2] 李昊. 论生态损害的侵权责任构造——以损害拟制条款为进路[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学•人文科学•社会科学), 2019, 56(1): 49-60.
[3] 丁霖. 论生态环境损害代修复——兼论《民法典•侵权责任编》(草案)第1234条的完善[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 41(3): 57-66.
[4] 蒋大兴. 论私法的公共性维度——“公共性私法行为”的四维体系[J]. 政法论坛, 2016, 34(6): 61-74.
[5] 冯洁语. 公私法协动视野下生态环境损害赔偿的理论构成[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(2): 169-189.
[6] 程玉. 生态损害法律责任规则私法路径的完善[J]. 环境法评论, 2020(1): 18-38.
[7] 李琳. 法国生态损害之民法构造及其启示——以损害概念之扩张为进路[J]. 法治研究, 2020(2): 87-103.
[8] 吕忠梅, 窦海阳. 修复生态环境责任的实证解析[J]. 法学研究, 2017, 39(3): 125-142.
[9] 孙佑海, 王倩. 民法典侵权责任编的绿色规制限度研究——“公私划分”视野下对生态环境损害责任纳入民法典的异见[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2019(5): 62-69.