穆棱林区晚春鸟类组成特征和物种多样性
Bird Composition Characteristics and Species Diversity in Late Spring, Muling Forest Area
DOI: 10.12677/IJE.2021.104063, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李卫东, 刘艳华:东北林业大学野生动物与自然保护地学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨;张子栋, 周绍春, 尹冬冬*:黑龙江省野生动物研究所,黑龙江 哈尔滨;陈 红:牡丹江师范学院生命科学与技术学院,黑龙江 牡丹江
关键词: 穆棱鸟类群落物种多样性生境聚类分析Muling Bird Community Species Diversity Habitats Cluster Analysis
摘要: 为了掌握黑龙江省老爷岭南部穆棱林区鸟类组成特征和物种多样性,本研究于2021年4月末~5月初在穆棱林区随机选择13块生境样地,布设样线65条调查林栖鸟类;在鱼塘和水库随机设置鸟类观察点6处观察记录水鸟。此次调查共计记录到鸟类12目21科47种,其中雀形目鸟类16种;夏候鸟24种、留鸟14种、旅鸟8种和冬候鸟1种;调查发现的鸟类以古北型为主,共计22种,季风区型、中亚型较少,分别为2种和1种。13块生境样地共包含11种生境类型,其中冷杉林和栎树林在研究区域的面积分别占25.22%和17.26%,这2种生境中鸟类的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H′)分别为1.951和2.285、鸟类个体数量分别占21.26%和20.37%;鱼塘和水库面积仅占研究区域总面积的0.62%,但由于水域生境是水鸟的主要栖息场所,这2种生境的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H′)也较高,分别为1.405和2.166,鸟类个体数量共占25.30%。此外,对数量比例超过1%的鸟类和11种生境的聚类分析结果表明,在距离为15时穆棱林区常见鸟类可以分为4个伴生类群,生境可以分为4类。此次晚春季节调查记录到的鸟类数据,可为穆棱林区不同季节鸟类物种多样性研究提供基础数据。
Abstract: In order to understand the bird diversity in Muling forest area in the southern Laoyeling, Hei-longjiang Province, Chain, the survey on the bird species was conducted from late April to early May 2021, via 65 sample lines in 13 habitat sample plots. At the same time, 6 bird observation points were randomly set in fish pond and reservoir for observing and recording waterfowl. We recorded a toal of 47 bird species representing 12 orders and 21 families. Of all, 16 species were Passeriformes. There were 24 summer visitors, 14 species of residents, 8 passage migrants and 1 winter visitor. The survey found also that the predominant species of birds were palaearctic, with a total of 22 species, and the few were monsoon type and medium subtype, with 2 and 1 species respectively. The 13 habitat plots contained 11 habitat types, among which fir forest and oak forest accounted for 25.22% and 17.26% of the study area, respectively. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′) of birds in the two habitats was 1.951 and 2.285, respectively, and the number of individual birds accounted for 21.26% and 20.37%, respectively. Although the area of fish pond and reservoir only accounted for 0.62% of the total area of the study area, due to the water area was the main habitat of waterfowl, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′) of these two habitats was also high, which were 1.405 and 2.166 respectively, and the number of birds accounted for 25.30%. In addition. The cluster analysis of birds, using more than 1% population and 11 habitats, showed that, at the distance of 15, the common birds in Muling Forest could be divided into 4 associated groups and habitats could be divided into 4 broad categories. These results in this late spring survey can provide basic data for the study of seasonal bird species diversity in Muling forest area.
文章引用:李卫东, 张子栋, 刘艳华, 陈红, 周绍春, 尹冬冬. 穆棱林区晚春鸟类组成特征和物种多样性[J]. 世界生态学, 2021, 10(4): 545-557. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJE.2021.104063

参考文献

[1] 洪咏怡, 卢训令, 赵海鹏. 黄淮平原农业景观不同生境鸟类多样性特征及年际动态[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(5): 2045-2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 卢梦洁, 包新康, 李建亮, 等. 秦岭西段麦积山区域繁殖鸟类多样性[J]. 野生动物学报, 2021, 42(1): 124-136.
[3] Borges, S.H., Baccaro, F., Moreira, M., et al. (2019) Bird Assemblages on Amazonian River Islands: Patterns of Species Diversity and Composition. Biotropica, 51, 903-912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Nélida, R.V. and Martín, A.H. (2019) Cemeteries and Biodiversity Conservation in Cities: How Do Landscape and Patch- Level Attributes Influence bird Diversity in Urban Park Cemeteries? Urban Ecosystems, 22, 1037-1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Sasaki, K., Hotes, S., Kadoya, T., et al. (2020) Landscape Associations of Farmland Bird Diversity in Germany and Japan. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21, Article ID: e00891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 杜寅, 周放, 舒晓莲, 李一琳. 全球气候变暖对中国鸟类区系的影响[J]. 动物分类学报, 2009, 34(3): 664-674.
[7] 覃建庸, 陈名红, 向左甫. 鸟类的季节性迁徙方式与研究方法[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(17): 7278-7281.
[8] 孙太福, 聂圣鸿, 国天曰, 等. 曲阜孔林鸟类多样性和季节变化[J]. 野生动物学报2017, 38(3): 462-466.
[9] Sliwinski, M.S., Powell, L.A. and Schacht, W.H. (2020) Similar Bird Communities across Grazing Systems in the Ne-braska Sandhills. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 84, 802-812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Gabriel, J., Colorado, Z., David, M. and Giovany, V.C. (2018) Effects of Floristic and Structural Features of Shade Agroforestry Plantations on the Migratory Bird Community in Colombia. Agroforestry Systems, 92, 677-691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 郑光美. 鸟类学[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2012.
[12] 马建章. 黑龙江省鸟类志[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1992.
[13] 牛莹莹, 张子栋, 刘艳华, 邱岩明, 王道辉, 周绍春. 黑龙江穆棱东北红豆杉自然保护区兽类多样性及东北虎猎物资源[J]. 野生动物学报, 2021, 42(2): 355-362.
[14] 刘阳, 陈水华. 中国鸟类观察手册[M]. 湖南: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2021.
[15] 郑光美. 中国鸟类分类与分布名录[M]. 第2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.
[16] 阮得孟, 孙勇, 程嘉伟, 刘大伟, 鲁长虎. 盐城自然保护区新洋港河口不同生境冬季鸟类群落组成及其梯度变化[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(16): 5437-5448.
[17] 孙儒泳. 动物生态学原理[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2001: 398-401.
[18] 张明海, 萧前柱, 高中信. 多样性指数公式在鸟类群落中应用的探讨[J]. 生态学杂志, 1990, 9(5): 50-55.
[19] 马克平, 刘玉朋. 生物群落的多样性测度方法Ⅰ. α多样性的测度方法(下) [J]. 生物多样性, 1994, 2(4): 231-239.
[20] 张荣祖. 中国动物地理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.
[21] Rico-Sánchez, A.E., Sundermann, A., López-López, E., et al. (2020) Biological Diversity in Protected Areas: Not Yet Known but Already Threatened. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, Article ID: e01006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] McNeely, J.A. (2021) How to Conserve Biological Diversity: Perspectives from Ambio. Ambio, 50, 975-961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 赵人境, 戈晓宇, 李雄. “留白增绿”背景下北京市栖息生境型城市森林营建策略研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(10): 102-114.
[24] 张鹏骞, 张志明, 白加德, 刘艳菊, 周彩贤, 孟玉萍, 等. 北京南海子麋鹿苑鸟类多样性研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(5): 1740-1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Col-orado, G.J., Mehlman, D. and Valencia, C. (2018) Effects of Floristic and Structural Features of Shade Agroforestry Plantations on the Migratory Bird Community in Colombia. Agroforestry Systems, 92, 677-691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Rega-Brodsky, C.C. and Nilon, C.H. (2017) Forest Cover Is Important across Multiple Scales for Bird Communities in Vacant Lots. Urban Ecosystems, 20, 561-571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Belden, J.B., McMurry, S.T., Maul, J.D., et al. (2018) Relative Abundance Trends of Bird Populations in High Intensity Croplands in the Central United States. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 14, 692-702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Warren, P.S., Lerman, S.B., Andrade, R., et al. (2019) The More Things Change: Species Losses Detected in Phoenix despite Stability in Bird—Socioeconomic Relationships. Ecosphere, 10, Article ID: e02624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef