基于HYSPLIT模式的北京两场一次沙尘暴过程探究及气象服务保障分析
Research on a Dust Storm Process and Analysis of Meteorological Service Guarantee in Beijing Capital International Airport and Beijing Daxing International Airport Based on HYSPLIT Model
摘要: 利用机场报文、ECWMF-ERA5再分析、北京市环境监测保护中心的PM10浓度等资料,运用HYSPLIT模式对2021年3月15日北京首都机场和大兴机场发生的一次强沙尘过程进行了研究,并结合对航空运行的影响探讨了此次过程的气象服务保障情况。结果表明:此次沙尘过程是由对流层中低层强干冷平流引导蒙古气旋后部冷高压东移南下导致的。冷高压前沿位置偏南,影响大兴机场的沙尘路径也偏南,同时沙尘翻山后受地面偏北气流影响向南扩散,使得大兴机场不仅出现大风天气,还出现了沙暴天气。影响首都机场的沙尘路径偏北,因此首都机场以大风天气为主。此次过程中,各级民航气象部门对大兴机场沙暴天气的预报前期较为乐观,但由于前期对大风的预报结论准确,过程中服务及时有效,此次沙尘过程对首都和大兴机场的航空运行影响相对可控。
Abstract: Based on the data of airport reports, ECWMF-ERA5 reanalysis datasets and PM10 concentration data of Beijing Environmental Monitoring and Protection Center, a heavy dust process occurred in Beijing capital international airport and Beijing Daxing international airport on March 1, 2021 was studied by using HYSPLIT model. And the meteorological service guarantee was also discussed in combination with the impact on civil aviation. The results showed that the dust was sent by the cold anticyclone behind the Mongolia Cyclone which was led to move southward by the dry and cold advection in the lower troposphere. Front of cold anticyclone was located to the south, thus the dust path to Beijing Daxing international airport was to the south. At the same time, the dust spread southward after crossing the mountain under the influence of north wind, which resulted in not only high wind but also sandstorm in Beijing Daxing international airport. The path of dust to the Beijing capital international airport is further north. For this process, civil aviation meteorological departments are optimistic about the severity of the weather in Beijing Daxing international airport. But, due to the accurate prediction of high wind and timely and effective services, the impact of dust weather on civil aviation of two airports was limited.
文章引用:徐梦翔, 袁为, 王跃. 基于HYSPLIT模式的北京两场一次沙尘暴过程探究及气象服务保障分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2021, 11(11): 1416-1424. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2021.1111137

参考文献

[1] 王式功, 董光荣, 陈慧忠, 等. 沙尘暴研究的进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2000, 20(4): 349-356.
[2] 杜星, 拓艳婷, 梁希豪. 银川河东机场一次沙尘暴天气过程诊断分析[J]. 民航管理, 2014(7): 80-83.
[3] 张玉, 王程昱. 沈阳: 桃仙机场两次沙尘暴天气对比[J]. 中国航班, 2021(7): 4-7.
[4] 张芊, 庞可, 马彩云, 等. 基于HYSPLIT4模式及TraPSA分析平台的甘肃地区春冬季大气颗粒物输送路径及潜在源分析[J/OL]. 中国环境科学. 2021-10-06.[CrossRef
[5] 刘灏, 王颖, 王思潼, 等. 基于HSPLIT4模式的天水市颗粒物输送路径[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(8): 3529-3538.
[6] 花丛, 刘超, 张碧辉. 影响北京的两次沙尘过程传输特征对比分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2019, 39(6): 99-107.
[7] 王华, 轩春怡, 吴方, 等. 北京两次重污染沙尘天气成因及动力传输特征的对比研究[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2020, 14(4): 18-26.
[8] 王郭臣, 王东启, 陈振楼. 北京冬季严重污染过程的PM2.5污染特征和输送路径及潜在源区[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(7): 1931-1937.
[9] 桂海林, 秦贺, 赵培涛, 等. 2018年春季北京一次沙尘天气边界层特征及来源分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(4): 18-25.
[10] 金莲姬, 刘峥, 朱彬, 等. PM2.5空中输送对北京地面污染影响的地形强迫机制模拟研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(8): 2976-2986.
[11] 杨民, 蔡玉琴, 王式功, 等. 2000年春季中国北方沙尘暴天气气候成因研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2001(21): 6-11.
[12] 尹晓慧. 我国沙尘天气研究的最新进展与展望[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(4): 782-733.
[13] 彭维耿, 王海霞, 陈楠, 等. 银川河东机场沙尘天气环流类型及动力结构研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 26(9): 33-39.
[14] 段伯隆, 刘新伟, 郭润霞, 等. “3.15”北方强沙尘暴天气成因分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(4): 541-553.
[15] 陈跃浩, 高庆先, 高文康, 等. 沙尘天气对大气环境质量影响的量化研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(4): 364-369.
[16] 熊亚军, 唐宜西, 寇星霞, 等. 北京春季一次霾和沙尘混合污染天气过程分析[J]. 气象, 2018(1): 180-188.