人工智能人格权侵权责任规制困境与出路
On the AI’s Liability for Infringement of Personal Right: Predicament and Outlet of the Regulation
摘要: 随着科技的日新月异,人工智能已经逐渐走入千家万户,对人们的生活带来很大的影响,当然也在法律层面带来极为深刻和长远的挑战。文章从人工智能技术对人格权造成的侵权责任冲突与挑战的现状出发,分析问题产生的社会根源:技术迭代与立法滞后的冲突,其他社会规范调整之难,行为自由与权益保护的平衡矛盾,以及责任主体认定困难等综合因素作用的结果。笔者通过考查欧盟、美国和日本具有前瞻性和影响力的人工智能立法规范和制度设计,并结合我国技术发展水平和社会实际状况,提出了应有限地赋予人工智能民事主体地位,建立和完善人工智能相关责任保险机制,明确APP数据爬取技术和AI换脸技术对个人信息使用的边界和法律规制的建议。
Abstract: With the rapid development of science and technology, artificial intelligence has gradually entered thousands of households, which has a great impact on people’s lives, and of course, it also brings extremely profound and long-term challenges at the legal level. Starting from the current situation of the conflict and challenge of tort liability caused by artificial intelligence technology to personality rights, this article analyzes the origin of the problem from the society’s view: the conflict between technological iteration and legislative lag, the difficulty of adjusting other social norms, the balance contradiction between freedom of behavior and rights protection, and the result of comprehensive factors such as difficulty in identifying the responsible subject. By examining the forward-looking and influential artificial intelligence legislation and system design of the European Union, the United States, and Japan, and combining China’s technological development level and social actual conditions, the author proposes that artificial intelligence should be given the civil subject status in a limited way, the liability insurance mechanism related to artificial intelligence should be established and improved, and the boundary and legal regulation of APP data crawling technology and AI face changing technology on the use of personal information should be clarified.
文章引用:刘恋飞. 人工智能人格权侵权责任规制困境与出路[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(11): 3189-3196. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.1011436

参考文献

[1] 季卫东. 人工智能开发的理念、法律以及政策[J]. 东方法学, 2019(5): 4-13.
[2] 单美静. 隐私窃取及其防范: 基于人工智能技术的思考[J]. 犯罪研究, 2020(5): 8-15.
[3] 陈光. 论人工智能时代立法者的危机与生机[J]. 河北法学, 2020, 38(8): 160-174.
[4] 许中缘. 论智能机器人的工具性人格[J]. 法学评论, 2018, 36(5): 153-164.
[5] 崔靖梓. 算法歧视挑战下平等权保护的危机与应对[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2019, 37(3): 29-42.
[6] 袁曾. 人工智能有限法律人格审视[J]. 东方法学, 2017(5): 50-57.
[7] 袁曾. 权利视阈下的人工智能法律主体地位[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2019, 34(4): 89-98.
[8] 高完成, 宁卓名. 人工智能产品致害风险及其侵权责任规制[J]. 河南社会科学, 2021, 29(4): 57-67.
[9] 龙卫球. 科技法迭代视角下的人工智能立法[J]. 法商研究, 2020, 37(1): 57-72.
[10] 于游, 于锦秋. 大数据时代个人信息侵权的民法规制——以手机APP收集使用个人信息为视角[J]. 学术交流, 2021(5): 64-73.
[11] 曹越. AI换脸技术产生的危害与应对措施[J]. 南海法学, 2020, 4(4): 69-77.