基于CiteSpace的国内艾柯研究文献计量分析
A CiteSpace-Based Bibliometric Analysis of Eco Research in China
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2021.1011441, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 赵 曦, 肖 巍:重庆大学外国语学院,重庆
关键词: 艾柯研究文献计量分析CiteSpaceEco Research Bibliometric Analysis CiteSpace
摘要: 作为20世纪后半期最负盛名的知识分子之一,艾柯以其厚重的学术功底与丰沛的思想内涵吸引着世界各国学者对他及其作品进行研究。国内学者从20世纪80年代末便开始对艾柯及其作品进行研究,并取得了丰硕的成果。然而,目前国内尚无对艾柯研究的文献计量分析,这不利于回顾总结艾柯研究的发展历程以及展望其未来发展趋势。为此,文章基于CiteSpace文献计量分析软件,以CNKI为文献来源,对检索到的177篇国内艾柯研究期刊论文进行了文献计量分析,通过分析核心作者、关键词共现知识图谱和关键词时序图,揭示艾柯研究的热点主题及演变趋势。结果表明:1) 国内艾柯研究始于20世纪80年代末,2006年起逐渐成熟;2) 核心作者主要从事美学、文学方向的研究;3) 研究热点主要包括艾柯本人、《玫瑰之名》和《波多里诺》等艾柯作品以及艾柯的符号学和阐释学理论;4) 演化趋势大致可分为三个阶段,其中起步期和发展期聚焦于文学领域,成熟期主要关注艾柯的符号学和阐释学理论。文章对于总结过往艾柯研究成果和展望未来艾柯研究发展路径具有一定启示。
Abstract: As one of the most prestigious intellectuals in the second half of the 20th century, Eco, with his strong academic background and abundant intellectual connotations, has attracted scholars from all over the world to study him as well as his works. Domestic scholars have been studying Eco and his works since the end of 1980s, and have achieved fruitful achievements. However, there is no bibliometric analysis of Eco research in China, which is not conducive to reviewing and summarizing the development of Eco research and looking into its future development trend. To this end, this paper conducted a CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis of 177 domestic journal papers on Eco research from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), in order to reveal the hot topics and evolutionary trend of Eco research, by analyzing core authors, keyword co-occurrence knowledge graphs as well as keyword time series diagrams. The results show that: 1) Domestic Eco research began in the late 1980s and has matured since 2006; 2) The core authors are mainly from the fields of aesthetics and literature; 3) The main research topics include Eco himself, Eco’s literary works such as The Name of the Rose and Baudolino, and Eco’s semiotic and hermeneutic ideas; 4) The evolutionary trend can be roughly divided into three stages, with the initial and the developmental stages mainly focused in the literary field, and the mature stage mainly on Eco’s semiotic and hermeneutic theories. This paper sheds light on both the summarization of Eco research in the past and its development path in the future.
文章引用:赵曦, 肖巍. 基于CiteSpace的国内艾柯研究文献计量分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(11): 3222-3228. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.1011441

参考文献

[1] 李静. 符号的世界——艾柯小说研究[M]. 四川: 四川大学出版社, 2017.
[2] 肖天佑. U•埃科《玫瑰之名》与符号学[J]. 对外经济贸易大学学报, 1989(4): 55-59.
[3] 宋伟. 艾柯反对艾柯: 阐释的悖论与辩证的阐释[J]. 文艺争鸣, 2017(11): 120-122.
[4] 彭佳, 汤黎. 论隐喻——转喻的双重机制: 符号学透视[J]. 中国比较文学, 2018(3): 30-40.
[5] 孙慧. 《玫瑰之名》的元小说特征探幽[J]. 山东社会科学, 2009(4): 151-154.
[6] 李静. 符号与叙述化: 解读《波多里诺》[J]. 外国文学, 2009(2): 108-115.
[7] 刘璐. 历史的圣杯: 作为历史编纂元小说的《波多里诺》[J]. 兰州学刊, 2012(6): 213-214.
[8] 贺江, 于晓峰. 百科全书、符号与运动中的作品——论埃科小说《波多里诺》的“开放性”[J]. 兰州学刊, 2014(5): 203-205.
[9] 陆扬. 艾柯的困顿[J]. 文艺争鸣, 2017(11): 111-114.
[10] 张广奎. 从艾柯诠释学看翻译的特性[J]. 外语教学, 2007, 28(3): 88-91.
[11] 姚振军, 冯志伟. 艾柯文艺阐释学视角下的认知翻译批评模式研究[J]. 外语教学, 2020, 41(2): 93-97.
[12] 朱亮, 孟宪学. 文献计量法与内容分析法比较研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2013(6): 64-66.
[13] Chen, C. (2017) Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2, 1-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 胡志刚, 王贤文. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[15] 孙慧. 符号的意指与交流——论安贝托•艾柯符号诗学的文化逻辑学构想[J]. 山东社会科学, 2013(11): 106-109.
[16] 孙慧. 安贝托•艾柯反解构的诠释学理论[J]. 学术探索, 2012(10): 154-156.
[17] 郭全照. 试论艾柯的美学及其小说实践[J]. 文艺研究, 2014(9): 59-68.