论股东提案权制度的完善
On the Improvement of the System of Shareholders' Proposal Rights
摘要: 我国《公司法》第102条规定了股东提案权制度,但究其实貌,该制度在具体内部细则的建构和实施标准的明确上缺乏详细的规定,此种制度缺漏对我国公司实务中股东正常行使提案权造成了一定的困难。从比较法的视野来看,日本和美国的提案权制度都经历了较长的发展时间,并在各自实践的基础上形成了相应的制度规范结构。探究二者的立法经验,可以为我国股东提案权制度完善提供有益参考。我国应当从股东提案权行使条件、董事会审查义务以及股东提案权救济制度三个方面着手,对我国的股东提案权制度进行调整,以明确公司机构的相应职权,进而完善对股东权利的保护。
Abstract:
Article 102 of China’s company law stipulates the system of shareholders’ proposal rights, but in fact, the system lacks detailed provisions on the construction of specific internal rules and the defi-nition of implementation standards. This lack of the system has caused some difficulties for share-holders to exercise their proposal rights normally in China’s company practice. From the perspec-tive of comparative law, the proposal rights system of Japan and the United States has experienced a long development time, and formed the corresponding system normative structure on the basis of their respective practice. Exploring their legislative experience can provide a useful reference for the improvement of the shareholders’ proposal rights system in China. China should adjust the sys-tem of shareholders’ proposal rights from three aspects: the exercise conditions of shareholders’ proposal rights, the review obligation of the board of directors and the relief system of shareholders’ proposal rights, so as to clarify the corresponding functions and powers of corporate institutions, and then improve the protection of shareholders’ rights.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
刘连煜. 公司治理与社会责任[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2001: 180.
|
|
[2]
|
曾殷志. 论我国股东提案权制度缺陷与完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湖南: 湖南大学法律系, 2014.
|
|
[3]
|
伍坚. 股东提案权制度若干问题研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2008, 190(5): 16-19.
|
|
[4]
|
梁上上, 加藤贵仁, 朱大明. 中日股东提案权的剖析与借鉴——一种精细化比较的尝试[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(2): 49-67.
|
|
[5]
|
崔延花. 日本公司法典[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2005: 143-144.
|
|
[6]
|
刘胜军. 论我国上市公司股东提案权——以美国法为借鉴[J]. 河北法学, 2016, 34(9): 154-171.
|
|
[7]
|
夏仁凯. 我国股东提案权制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学法律系, 2014.
|
|
[8]
|
于苗苗. 股东提案权制度探究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学法律系, 2016.
|