AI民事主体地位论证的二个维度

Two Dimensions of the Demonstration of AI Civil Subject Status

摘要: AI技术发展催生新一轮法律制度革新，人工智能民事主体探讨此起彼伏。人工智能主体地位应当以人工智能技术独有的发展特性为基础，从法理和法律制度构建两方面论证。现有支持赋予人工智能主体地位的论证仅仅依据赋予人工智能主体地位具有法理上的可能性和法律制度构建上的可行性，忽略了必要性的论证，具有明显的逻辑漏洞。现阶段人工智能主体地位选择是一种治理模式的选择，赋予人工智能民事主体地位在本质上不具有当然性，在形式上不具有必要性，在法律制度构建上也不具有优越性。

Abstract: The development of AI technology has spawned a new round of legal system innovation, and ar-tificial intelligence civil subjects are discussed one after another. The legal status of artificial intelligence should be based on the unique development characteristics of artificial intelligence technology, and it should be demonstrated from two aspects: jurisprudence and legal system construction. Existing arguments that support granting artificial intelligence subject status are only based on the legal possibility of granting artificial intelligence subject status and the feasibility of legal system construction, ignoring the necessity of the argument, and having obvious logical loopholes. At this stage, the choice of artificial intelligence subject status is a choice of governance model. It is not natural in nature to give artificial intelligence civil subject status, it is not necessary in form, and it has no superiority in the construction of legal system.