弗洛姆与鲍德里亚消费异化理论的比较分析
A Comparative Analysis of Fromm’s and Baudrillard’s Theory of Consumption Alienation
摘要: 弗洛姆和鲍德里亚都对资本主义社会中出现的消费异化问题作出了深刻的揭示和剖析。二者的理论均是在承继于马克思主义的同时，与其他观念相结合，因而在分析的视角上呈现出差异性；对于消费异化所带来的种种表现和后果，二者的见解也有所不同；而在最终扬弃消费异化的途径上，虽然解决方案不同，但二者都呈现出了乌托邦的色彩。
Abstract:
Both Fromm and Baudrillard have deeply revealed and analyzed the phenomenon of consumption alienation in capitalist society. Both theories are inherited from Marxism, and at the same time, they are combined with other concepts, so they show differences in the perspective of analysis; they have different views on the various manifestations and consequences of consumption alienation; In terms of the ultimate solution to consumer alienation, although the solutions are different, both show a utopian trend.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
埃里希∙弗洛姆. 健全的社会[M]. 孙恺祥, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2011: 127, 139.
|
|
[2]
|
让∙鲍德里亚. 消费社会[M]. 刘成富, 全志钢, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2014: 1, 43, 72, 116, 117, 177, 197.
|
|
[3]
|
让∙鲍德里亚. 物体系[M]. 林志明, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2001: 223, 224.
|
|
[4]
|
埃里希∙弗洛姆. 占有还是存在[M]. 李穆, 等, 译. 北京: 世界图书出版社, 2015: 59, 183.
|
|
[5]
|
埃里希∙弗洛姆. 为自己的人[M]. 孙依依, 译. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 1988: 87.
|
|
[6]
|
埃里希∙弗洛姆. 逃避自由[M]. 刘林海, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2015: 85.
|