社会创业企业资源拼凑前因分析——基于fsQCA
Analysis of the Antecedent Combinations of Bricolage in Social Entrepreneurship—Based on fsQCA
摘要: 为了给处于资源困境中的社会创业企业选择有效的资源拼凑策略，在资源拼凑理论的基础上，以24家社会企业为研究对象，运用FsQCA方法研究了导致社会企业需求型及构想型拼凑行为的前因组合。结果表明：① 高先前经验、低创业导向、低环境包容性的社会企业采取需求性拼凑行为的几率更大；② 高先前经验、高战略柔性以及低环境包容性的社会企业发生需求型拼凑行为的几率也比较大；③ 高创业导向、高环境包容性的社会企业发生构想型拼凑行为的几率比较大。研究扩充了社会创业资源拼凑相关领域的理论知识，为社会创业企业克服资源限制并提高其合法性和公司绩效提供了指南。
Abstract: In order to provide social entrepreneurship in resource dilemma with effective bricolage strategy, based on bricolage theory, this paper studied the antecedent combinations that influence demand-based and ideational bricolage in social entrepreneurship by using the method of fsQCA in 24 samples. The results show that: 1) Social entrepreneurship with high prior experience, low entrepreneurial orientation and low environmental munificence tend to adopt demand-based bricolage; 2) Social entrepreneurship with high prior experience, high strategic flexibility and low environmental munificence tend to adopt demand-based bricolage; 3) Social entrepreneurship with high entrepreneurial orientation and high environmental munificence are more inclined to adopt ideational bricolage. This study enriches the research in the fields related to bricolage of social entrepreneurship, and plays a certain guiding role in breaking through the resource dilemma of social entrepreneurship, improving the legitimacy and enterprise performance.
文章引用：王柏轩, 李若冰 (2021). 社会创业企业资源拼凑前因分析——基于fsQCA. 心理学进展, 11(12), 2694-2706. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.11122307

参考文献

[1] 杜运周, 贾良定(2017). 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路. 管理世界, (6), 155-167.
[2] 方世建, 黄明辉(2013). 创业新组拼理论溯源､主要内容探析与未来研究展望. 外国经济与管理, 35(10), 2-12.
[3] 付丙海(2017). 创业拼凑的诱发机制及其对新创企业绩效的影响研究. 博士学位论文, 上海: 上海交通大学.
[4] 黄艳, 陶秋燕, 高腾飞(2020). 资源拼凑: 起源､研究脉络与理论框架. 科技进步与对策, 37(3), 151-160.
[5] 李桦, 彭思喜(2011). 战略柔性､双元性创新和企业绩效. 管理学报, 8(11), 1604-1609.
[6] 李萌(2019). 创业者先前经验､创业资源拼凑与新创企业成长的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 大连: 大连理工大学.
[7] 刘振, 丁飞, 肖应钊, 崔连广(2019a). 资源拼凑视角下社会创业机会识别与开发的机制研究. 管理学报, 16(7), 1006-1015.
[8] 刘振, 管梓旭, 李志刚, 管珺(2019b). 社会创业的资源拼凑——理论背景､独特属性与问题思考. 研究与发展管理, 31(1), 10-20.
[9] 刘振, 杨俊, 张玉利(2015). 社会创业研究——现状述评与未来趋势. 科学学与科学技术管理, 36(6), 26-35.
[10] 欧绍华, 张志伟(2019). 创业激情､创业拼凑与新企业绩效关系研究. 科技进步与对策, 36(7), 26-32.
[11] 彭伟, 于小进, 郑庆龄(2019a). 基于扎根理论的社会创业企业资源拼凑策略研究. 财经论丛, (1), 81-90.
[12] 彭伟, 于小进, 郑庆龄, 祝振铎(2018). 资源拼凑､组织合法性与社会创业企业成长——基于扎根理论的多案例研究. 外国经济与管理, 40(12), 55-70.
[13] 彭伟, 郑庆龄, 唐康丹, 赵栩(2019b). 社会创业企业资源拼凑行为的驱动机制研究——基于模糊集的定性比较分析. 南方经济, (10), 90-101.
[14] 汤淑琴, 蔡莉, 陈彪(2014). 创业者经验研究回顾与展望. 外国经济与管理, 36(1), 12-19.
[15] 田宇(2017). 资源拼凑对企业双元创新的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学.
[16] 万伦来, 达庆利(2003). 企业柔性的本质及其构建策略. 管理科学学报, 6(2), 89-94.
[17] 王国红, 秦兰, 邢蕊, 等(2018). 新企业创业导向转化为成长绩效的内在机理研究——以创业拼凑为中间变量的案例研究. 中国软科学, 39(5), 135-146.
[18] 王兆群, 胡海青, 张琅(2019). 创业拼凑､机会开发与新创企业创业绩效关系研究. 科技进步与对策, 36(14), 1-7.
[19] 吴亮, 刘衡(2017). 资源拼凑与企业创新绩效研究: 一个被调节的中介效应. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 57(4), 193-208.
[20] 于晓宇, 李雅洁, 陶向明(2017). 创业拼凑研究综述与未来展望. 管理学报, 14(2), 306-316.
[21] 张芳菲(2020). 创业拼凑对国际新创企业绩效的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学.
[22] 张秀娥, 张坤(2018). 创业导向对新创社会企业绩效的影响——资源拼凑的中介作用与规制的调节作用. 科技进步与对策, 35(9), 91-99.
[23] 周飞, 沙振权, 孙锐(2019). 市场导向､资源拼凑与商业模式创新的关系研究. 科研管理, 40(1), 113-120.
[24] 祝振铎(2015). 创业导向､创业拼凑与新企业绩效: 一个调节效应模型的实证研究. 管理评论, 27(11), 57-65.
[25] Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1-22.[CrossRef] 
[26] Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329-366.[CrossRef] 
[27] Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising Firms: Bricolage, Account Giving and Improvisational Competencies in the Founding Process. Research Policy, 32, 255-276.[CrossRef] 
[28] Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or Bricolage? Overcoming Resource Constraints in Global Social Entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7, 26-49.[CrossRef] 
[29] Dess, G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73.[CrossRef] 
[30] Duymdjian, R. (2010). Towards a Foundation of Bricolage in Organization and Management Theory. Organization Studies, 31, 133-151.[CrossRef] 
[31] Guo, H., Tang, J. T., & Su, Z. F. (2014). To Be Different, Or to Be the Same? The Interactive Effect of Organizational Regulatory Legitimacy and Entrepreneurial Orientation on New Venture Performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31, 665-685.[CrossRef] 
[32] Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 105-130.[CrossRef] 
[33] Hooi, H. C., Ahmad, N. H., Amran, A. et al. (2016). The Functional Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Entrepreneurial Bricolage in Ensuring Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Management Research Review, 39, 1616-1638.[CrossRef] 
[34] Li, H. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The Role of Managers’ Political Networking and Functional Experience in New Venture Performance: Evidence from China’s Transition Economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 791-804.[CrossRef] 
[35] Li, Y., Wei, Z. L., & Liu, Y. (2010). Strategic Orientations, Knowledge Acquisition, and Firm Performance: The Perspective of the Vendor in Cross-Border Outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1457-1482.[CrossRef] 
[36] Lomberg, C., Urbig, D., Stockmann, C. et al. (2017). Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Dimensions’ Shared Effects in Explaining Firm Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 973-998.[CrossRef] 
[37] Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.[CrossRef] 
[38] Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic Flexibility in Product Competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 135-159.[CrossRef] 
[39] Santos, F. M. (2012). A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 335-351.[CrossRef] 
[40] Senyard, J., Baker, T., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Entrepreneurial Bricolage: Towards Systematic Empirical Testing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29, 1-15.
[41] Steffens, P., & Senyard, J. (2019). Linking Resource Acquisition and Development Processes to Resource-Based Advantage: Bricolage and the Resource-Based View. In 2009 Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference (pp. 1-14).
[42] Zahra, S. A., Rawhouser, H. N., Bhawe, N. et al. (2008). Globalization of Social Entrepreneurship Opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 117-131.[CrossRef]