基于不同网格划分策略的连续体拓扑优化对比分析
Comparative Analysis of Continuum Topology Optimization Based on Different Meshing Strategies
摘要: 将双孔连接板作为研究对象,选择三种不同的网格划分方案进行静力学有限元分析,得到对应的等效应力云图;根据其受力情况,进行结构拓扑优化。基于不同网格划分策略,对比轻量化效果,确定一种适合的网格划分方案。
Abstract: Taking the double hole connecting plate as the research object and selecting three different meshing methods for static finite element analysis, obtain corresponding equivalent stress nephogram. According to the stress condition, the structure topology optimization design is carried out. Based on different grid generation strategies, contrasting lightweight effect, determine a suitable grid generation scheme.
文章引用:邱涛, 宋佳欣, 师启博, 赵宽. 基于不同网格划分策略的连续体拓扑优化对比分析[J]. 机械工程与技术, 2021, 10(6): 603-610. https://doi.org/10.12677/MET.2021.106067

参考文献

[1] 李海峰, 吴冀川, 刘建波, 梁宇兵. 有限元网格剖分与网格质量判定指标[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(3): 368-377.
[2] Shivanna, K.H., Tadepalli, S.C. and Grosland, N.M. (2010) Feature-Based Multiblock Finite Element Mesh Generation. Computer-Aided Design, 42, 1108-1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Huang, L.L., Zhao, G.Q., Wang, Z.L. and Zhang, X.W. (2016) Adaptive Hexahedral Mesh Generation and Regeneration Using an Improved Grid-Based Method. Advances in Engineering Software, 102, 49-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 占金青, 彭怡平, 龙良明, 刘敏. 基于应力约束的多相材料结构拓扑优化设计[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(1): 149-155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 古成中, 吴新跃. 有限元网格划分及发展趋势[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2008, 2(3): 248-259.
[6] 王家鋆, 敖勇, 邓志成. 汽轮机内缸有限元分析与网格划分方案优化[J]. 计算机辅助工程, 2020, 29(2): 34-38.
[7] 王瑞, 高曙明, 吴海燕. 六面体网格生成和优化研究进展[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2020, 32(5): 693-708.
[8] 许磊, 杜彦斌, 张磊. 基于拓扑分割的泵叶轮六面体网格划分方法[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 37(4): 39-45.
[9] 杨猛. CK61125数控车床主轴箱的有限元分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2011.
[10] Zhang, S.S., Li, H.M. and Huang, Y.C. (2020) An Improved Multi-Objective Topology Optimization Model Based on SIMP Method for Continuum Structures Including Self-Weight. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 63, 2-4. (Prepublish). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 姚屏, 林源, 汤勇, 曾琴. 结构拓扑优化方法及其机器人轻量化应用现状及发展[J]. 机电工程技术, 2018, 47(11): 117-122.