国际投资保护与兼顾双方利益
International Investment Protectionand Considering Interests of Both Sides
摘要: 实践中,国际投资引发的争议问题层出不穷,国际投资保护日益受到重视。本文主要围绕“国际投资保护与兼顾双方利益”这个主题展开。首先,本文对国际投资保护进行了概述,反映了从传统国际投资保护到现代国际投资保护的转变、从侧重保护投资者利益到兼顾双方利益的转变。其次,本文探讨了兼顾投资者和东道国利益的原因,首先从直接原因、间接原因两方面进行分析,然后进一步阐述了兼顾双方利益的重要原因。最后,本文结合我国《外商投资法》的有关规定,进一步强调兼顾双方利益,并对我国《外商投资法》提出了改进建议。
Abstract: In practice, disputes arising from international investment emerge one after another and international investment protection is increasingly valued. This paper mainly focuses on “International Investment Protection and Considering Interests of Both Sides”. First of all, this paper gives an overview of international investment protection, which reflects the transformation from traditional international investment protection to modern international investment protection, and the transformation from focusing on the protection of investors’ interests to taking into account the interests of both sides. Secondly, this paper discusses the reasons for balancing the interests of both investors and host countries, firstly from the direct and indirect reasons, and then expounds on the significant reasons for taking into account the interests of both sides. Finally, this paper combines the relevant provisions of China’s Foreign Investment Law, further emphasizes the consideration of the interests of both sides, and puts forward suggestions for the improvement of China’s Foreign Investment Law.
文章引用:马妍. 国际投资保护与兼顾双方利益[J]. 争议解决, 2021, 7(4): 257-262. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2021.74033

参考文献

[1] 余劲松. 国际投资法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014: 11-13.
[2] 詹晓宁. 国际投资体系的特征和发展趋势[J]. 国际经济合作, 2007(5): 4-5.
[3] 吴其胜. 国际投资规则新发展与中国的战略选择[J]. 国际关系研究, 2014(2): 134-146.
[4] 余劲松, 吴志攀, 主编. 国际经济法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014: 229-230.
[5] 张晓斌. 双边投资协定是否确实促进了外资增长——BITs引资效果的经验研究[J]. 经济学家, 2006(2): 57-63.
[6] 宁红玲, 漆彤. “一带一路”倡议与可持续发展原则——国际投资法视角[J]. 武大经济法评论, 2016(1): 228-245.
[7] 郑蕴. 外国投资法与改革开放: 国际规则与国内制度的平衡[J]. 人民法治, 2019(7): 10-13.
[8] 王彦志. 经济全球化、可持续发展与国际投资法第三波[C]//2005年中国国际经济法学会年会暨学术研讨会. 2005年中国国际经济法学会年会暨学术研讨会论文集. 长沙: 中国国际经济法学会, 2005: 489-506.