不同间隔时间体外冲击波治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效观察
Observation of the Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave at Different Intervals in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2021.1112864, PDF,   
作者: 刘亚丽, 于观潇, 张涛琳:青岛大学附属青岛市市立医院运动医学康复中心,山东 青岛;张其亮:青岛大学附属青岛市市立医院骨关节与运动医学科,山东 青岛
关键词: 体外冲击波间隔时间膝关节骨性关节炎Extracorporeal Shock Wave Intervals Knee Osteoarthritis
摘要: 目的:本研究通过比较不同间隔时间体外冲击波治疗(extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ESWT)膝关节骨性关节炎(knee osteoarthritis, KOA)的效果,以评估体外冲击波(ESW)治疗KOA的最佳间隔时间,为临床KOA提供实验数据,以期为KOA患者提供更精准的疗效。方法:选取我院运动医学康复中心住院及骨科门诊在2020年3月~2021年3月期间收治的KOA患者共90位,采用随机数字表法将患者分为ABC组,每组30人,三组均在常规康复治疗的基础上进行ESWT,完整治疗4次;A组患者每间隔6天使用一次ESWT;B组患者每间隔3天使用一次ESWT;C组患者每间隔1天使用一次ESWT。采用肢体活动疼痛视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue score, VAS)、WOMAC骨关节炎指数(The Western Ontario and McMaster Universi-ties, WOMAC)、5次坐立试验(five-times-sit-to-stand test, FTSST)来分析比较各组KOA患者的疗效。结果:1) 治疗前三组一般临床资料差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。2) 首次治疗结束后一个月,组间比较发现A组VAS、WOMAC及FTSST优于B、C组(P < 0.05),C组各指标比B组差,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。3) 组内比较发现与治疗前相比三组各指标均明显下降(P < 0.05)。结论:体外冲击波用于膝关节骨性关节炎患者可以缓解疼痛,改善膝关节功能障碍,间隔时间为6天时ESW治疗KOA的疗效最佳。
Abstract: Objective: This study compares the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) at different intervals in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). In order to evaluate the optimal interval for extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) treatment of KOA, KOA Standardized treatment provides experimental data to provide more accurate curative effects for KOA patients. Methods: A total of 90 KOA patients admitted to the inpatient and orthopedic clinics of our hospital’s Sports Medicine Rehabilitation Center from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected. The patients were divided into ABC groups by random number table method, 30 people in each group, and all three groups ESWT was performed on the basis of conventional rehabilitation treatment, and 4 complete treatments were performed; patients in group A used ESWT every 6 days; patients in group B used ESWT every 3 days; patients in group C used ESWT every 1 day. Using visual analogue score (VAS), WOMAC osteoarthritis index (The Western Ontario and McMaster Universi-ties, WOMAC), and five-times-sit-to-stand test, FTSST) to analyze and compare the efficacy of KOA patients in each group. Results: 1) There was no significant difference in general clinical data between the three groups before treatment (P > 0.05). 2) One month after the first treatment, VAS, WOMAC and FTSST in group A were better than those in group B and C (P < 0.05), and the indexes of group C were worse than group B. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). 3) Compared within the group, it was found that the indexes of the three groups were significantly decreased compared with that before treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Extracorporeal shock wave for knee osteoarthritis patients can effectively relieve pain and improve knee dysfunction. KOA has the best effect when the ESWT treatment interval is 6 days.
文章引用:刘亚丽, 于观潇, 张涛琳, 张其亮. 不同间隔时间体外冲击波治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效观察[J]. 临床医学进展, 2021, 11(12): 5841-5874. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2021.1112864

参考文献

[1] 谢军, 柳建德. 膝关节骨性关节炎的临床研究进展[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(6): 68.
[2] Peffers, M.J., Balaskas, P. and Smagul, A. (2018) Osteoarthritis Year in Review 2017: Genetics and Epigenetics. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 26, 304-311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Magnusson, K., Turkiewicz, A. and Englund, M. (2019) Nature vs Nurture in Knee Osteoarthritis—The Importance of Age, Sex and Body Mass Index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 27, 586-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 王斌, 邢丹, 董圣杰, 等. 中国膝骨关节炎流行病学和疾病负担的系统评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(2): 134-142.
[5] Berenbaum, F. (2008) New Horizons and Perspectives in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组. 骨关节炎诊疗指南(2018年版) [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2018, 38(12): 705-715.
[7] 张利恒, 马云杰. 体外冲击波是治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的最新疗法[J]. 医学与哲学, 2018, 39(10B): 9-11.
[8] Kang, S., Gao, F., Han, J., et al. (2018) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment Can Normalize Painful Bone Marrow Edema in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Historical Cohort Study. Medicine, 97, e9796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lu, Z., Lin, G., Reed-Maldonado, A., et al. (2017) Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment Improves Erectile Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Urology, 71, 223-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 邢娟, 胡树华, 汤沉沉, 程琼. 体外冲击波治疗膝骨性关节炎患者的疗效观察[J]. 中国康复, 2018, 33(6): 505-507.
[11] 廖林波, 王小超, 梁俊卿. 膝骨性关节炎易感性与相关基因多态性研究进展[J]. 右江医学, 2017, 45(6): 732-735.
[12] Revenaugh, M.S. (2005) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treatment of Osteoarthritis in the Horse: Clinical Applications. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice, 21, 609-625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Wang, F.S., Wang, C.J., Sheen-Chen, S.M., et al. (2002) Superoxide Mediates Shock Wave Induction of ERK-Dependent Osteogenic Transcription Factor (CBFAl) and Mesenchymal Cell Differentiation toward Osteoprogenitors. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 10931-10937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Gollwitzer, H., Saxena, A., DiDomenico, L.A., et al. (2015) Clinically Relevant Effectiveness of Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 97, 701-708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Wang, C.J., Sun, Y.C., Wong, T., et al. (2012) Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Shows Time-Dependent Chondroprotective Effects in Osteoarthritis of the Knee in Rats. Journal of Surgical Research, 178, 196-205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Gollwitzer, H., Diehl, P., von Korff, A., et al. (2007) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Chronic Painful Heel Syndrome: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Assessing the Efficiency of a New Electromagnetic Shock Wave Device. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 46, 348-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Gerdesmeyer, L., Frey, C., Vester. J., et al. (2008) Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Chronic Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Confimatory Randomized Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 36, 2100-2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] McClinton, S.M., Heiderscheit, B.C. and McPoil, T.G. (2019) Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Treatment in Addition to Usual Podiatry Management of Plantar Heel Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Lee, J.H., Lee, S., Choi, S., et al. (2017) The Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on the Pain and Function of Patients with Degenerative Knee Arthritis. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29, 536-538.
[20] Lyon, R., Liu, X.C., Kubin, M., et al. (2013) Does Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Enhance Healing of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Rabbit Knee? A Pilot Study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471, 1159-1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Alshihri, A., Peer, W.K., Heimes, D., et al. (2019) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Stimulates Angiogenesis and Collagen Production in Facial Soft Tissue. Journal of Surgical Research, 245, 483-491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Wang, C.J. (2012) Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Li, W., Pan, Y., Yang, Q., et al. (2018) Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study. Medicine, 97, e11418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kim, J.H., Kim, J.Y., Choi, C.M., et al. (2015) The Dose-Related Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39, 616-623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 吴宗耀. 体外冲击波治疗[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2015, 37(10): 787-793.
[26] 赵喆, 刘春梅, 白晓东, 等. 体外冲击波对兔膝软骨细胞增殖的影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(9): 824-826.
[27] 陈捷, 段小军, 黄振俊, 等. 骨肌疾病体外冲击波疗法中国专家共识[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志, 2017, 9(2): 25-33.
[28] 席立成, 李宏宇, 赵子星, 等. 体外冲击波治疗早中期膝关节骨性关节炎效果观察及其机制[J]. 山东医药, 2016, 56(48): 60-62.