全球银行网络的尾部风险溢出实证分析
An Empirical Analysis of Tail Risk Spillover in Global Banking Networks
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2021.1012467, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 余靖雯, 仝青山, 黄创霞*:长沙理工大学数学与统计学院,湖南 长沙
关键词: 系统性风险尾部风险银行网络重要节点Systemic Risk Tail Risk Bank Network Important Nodes
摘要: 本文基于2007年至2019年全球69家金融机构日收盘数据,采用CoVaR方法度量各个金融机构之间的尾部风险溢出效应,并建立有向加权尾部风险溢出网络。首先,从全局和区域的角度分析了该网络的风险溢出水平,当股票市场面临危机时,全局系统性风险溢出强度和跨区域系统性风险溢出强度均达最大值,同时跨区域的系统性风险溢出强度的结果表明,在平稳时期,风险倾向于在同一区域内部传播,但在遭遇危机时,风险倾向于跨区域传播。其次,构建系统性风险指数,在此基础上得出各金融机构风险接收与溢出的指数排名。研究发现美国银行、花旗银行、富国银行、巴克莱银行和汇丰银行常年具有较高的系统重要性,而系统性风险溢出强度结果表明招商银行,中国银行和工商银行的系统重要性正在逐年上升。
Abstract: Based on the daily closing data of 69 global financial institutions from 2007 to 2019, this paper adopts CoVaR method to measure the tail risk spillover effect among financial institutions, and establishes a directed weighted tail risk spillover network. First of all, this paper analyzes the network from the perspective of global and regional risk of overflow level, when the stock market is facing crisis, the total connectedness and the strength of cross sector reach the maximum, and the strength of cross sector results shows that in the stable period, risk tends to spread within the same area, but in a crisis, risk tends to spread across regions. Second, a systemic risk index is constructed, and on this basis, an index ranking of the risk acceptance and spillover of various financial institutions is obtained. The study found that Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Barclays Bank and HSBC have high systemic importance throughout the year, and the results of systemic risk emitter indicate that the systemic importance of China Merchants Bank, Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China is increasing year by year.
文章引用:余靖雯, 仝青山, 黄创霞. 全球银行网络的尾部风险溢出实证分析[J]. 应用数学进展, 2021, 10(12): 4386-4395. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2021.1012467

参考文献

[1] Wen, F., Yang, X. and Zhou, W.X. (2019) Tail Dependence Networks of Global Stockmarkets. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24, 558-567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 卜林, 王雪杰, 刘志强. 全球股票市场系统性风险传递网络研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2020(3): 87-96.
[3] 邓向荣, 曹红. 系统性风险, 网络传染与金融机构系统重要性评估[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2016(3): 52-60.
[4] Gong, X.L., Liu, X.H., Xiong, X. and Zhang, W. (2019) Financial Systemic Risk Measurement Based on Causal Network Connectedness Analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 64, 290-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 王克达, 庞晓波, 王姗姗. 金融危机对全球股票市场的传染研究: 基于复杂网络分析方法[J]. 世界经济研究, 2018(4): 28-39.
[6] 章晟, 李士岩. 基于关联性角度的系统性风险度量模型研究综述[J]. 武汉金融, 2016(2): 27-31.
[7] Neveu, A.R. (2018) A Survey of Network-Based Analysis and Systemic Risk Measurement. Journal of Economic Interaction & Coordination, 13, 1-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Levy-Carciente, S., Kenett, D.Y., Avakian, A., Stanley, H.E. and Havlin, S. (2015) Dynamical Macroprudential Stress Testing Using Network Theory. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 164-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 汪小帆, 李翔, 陈关荣. 复杂网络理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006.
[10] Billio, M., Lo, A.W., Sherman, M.G. and Pelizzon, L. (2012) Econometric Measures of Connectedness and Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sectors. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 104, 535-559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Diebold, F.X. and Yilmaz, K. (2014) On the Network Topology of Variance Decompositions: Measuring the Connectedness of Financial Firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182, 119-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Nikolaus, H., Julia, S. and Melanie, S. (2013) Financial Network Systemic Risk Contributions. SSRN Electronic Journal, 19, 685-738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wang, G.J., Xie, C., He, K. and Stanley, H.E. (2017) Extreme Risk Spillover Network: Application to Financial Institutions. Quantitative Finance, 17, 1417-1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Härdle, W.K., Wang, W. and Yu, L. (2016) TENET: Tail-Event Driven Network Risk. Journal of Econometrics, 192, 499-513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Adrian, T. and Brunnermeier, M.K. (2016) CoVaR. American Economic Review, 106, 1705-1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 王天一. 国际间股市的有向尾部风险溢出现象[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2011(10): 2-11.
[17] 曾裕峰, 温湖炜, 陈学彬. 股市互联、尾部风险传染与系统重要性市场——基于多元分位数回归模型的分析[J]. 国际金融研究, 2017(9): 86-96.
[18] 谢福座. 基于CoVaR方法的金融风险溢出效应研究[J]. 金融发展研究, 2010(6): 59-63.
[19] 叶莉, 王远哲, 陈勇勇. 基于尾部风险关联网络的中国金融机构间风险溢出效应研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2019, 34(3): 55-64.
[20] Hu, S., Gu, Z., Wang, Y. and Zhang, X. (2019) An Analysis of the Clustering Effect of a Jump Risk Complex Network in the Chinese Stock Market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 523, 622-630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Wang, G.J., Jiang, Z.Q., Lin, M., Xie, C. and Stanley, H.E. (2018) Interconnectedness and Systemic Risk of China’s Financial Institutions. Emerging Markets Review, 35, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef