哈尔滨松北国家湿地公园春季浮游植物功能群研究及水质健康评价
Study on Phytoplankton Functional Groups and Water Quality Evaluation in Harbin Songbei National Wetland Park in May
DOI: 10.12677/BR.2022.111007, PDF,   
作者: 曹 钊*, 柴一涵, 杨晨浩, 于洪贤#:东北林业大学,黑龙江 哈尔滨;雷国康*:中石油昆仑气电有限公司,黑龙江 大庆;陈方昕, 吴炳懿, 叶纯子:哈尔滨市林业和草原科研中心,黑龙江 哈尔滨;柴方营#:黑龙江科技大学,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 浮游植物功能群松北国家湿地公园水质评价Phytoplankton Functional Group Songbei Wetland Water Quality Evaluation
摘要: 为了解松北国家湿地公园春季的水体浮游植物群落结构特征及其与水环境因子之间的关系,于2021年5月在松北国家湿地公园设置了8个采样点并进行浮游植物的采集以及水体理化因子的测定。结果共划分出19个功能群,其中最重要的是Y功能群,占比22.36%。通过Shanno-Weaver多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数对松北国家湿地公园的水质进行评价,多数处于轻污染或无污染状态。RDA分析结果显示TP、TN、pH和CODCr是对浮游植物影响最显著的环境理化因子。TP与优势功能群E等呈显著正相关,与优势功能群X2等有较小相关性,与优势功能群P、C、D、J等呈显著负相关;TN与优势功能群X2呈显著正相关;pH与优势功能群X1、J等呈显著正相关;CODCr与优势功能群J、C、D等呈显著正相关,与优势功能群E等呈显著负相关。
Abstract: The paper is proposed to order to understand the characteristics of phytoplankton community structure in Songbei National Wetland Park in spring and its relationship with water environment factors, and evaluate the water environment health system through phytoplankton diversity and other data. Eight sampling sites were set up in Songbei National Wetland Park in May 2021 to collect zooplankton and determine the physical and chemical factors of water body. The results showed that according to the community characteristics of plant functional groups, 19 functional groups were divided, of which Y functional group was the most important, accounting for 22.36%. The water quality of Songbei National Wetland Park is evaluated by Shanno-Weaver diversity index and Pielou evenness index. Most of them are in the state of light pollution or no pollution. The results of RDA analysis showed that TP, TN, pH and CODCr were the most significant environmental physical and chemical factors affecting phytoplankton. TP was significantly positively correlated with dominant functional group E, slightly correlated with dominant functional group X2, and significantly negatively correlated with dominant functional groups P, C, D, J; TN was positively correlated with dominant functional group X2; there was a significant positive correlation between pH pair and dominant functional groups X1 and J; CODCr was significantly positively correlated with dominant functional groups J, C and D, and negatively correlated with dominant functional group E.
文章引用:曹钊, 雷国康, 陈方昕, 柴一涵, 杨晨浩, 吴炳懿, 叶纯子, 于洪贤, 柴方营. 哈尔滨松北国家湿地公园春季浮游植物功能群研究及水质健康评价[J]. 植物学研究, 2022, 11(1): 46-54. https://doi.org/10.12677/BR.2022.111007

参考文献

[1] 张俊芳, 胡晓红, 马沛明, 陈威, 胡菊香. 汤浦水库浮游植物功能群季节演替及关键驱动因子[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2021, 42(3): 55-62.
[2] Reynolds, C.S., Huszar, V., Kruk, C., et al. (2002) Towards a Functional Classification of the Freshwater Phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 24, 417-428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Padisak, J., Crossetti, L.O. and Naselli-Flores, L. (2009) Use and Misuse in the Application of the Phytoplankton Functional Classification: A Critical View with Updates. Hydrobiologia, 621, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 陈倩, 吴琼, 罗欢. 太湖水库蓄水前后浮游植物群落结构特征[J]. 生态科学, 2020, 39(6): 75-82.
[5] 潘海峰. 三江自然保护区浮游生物功能群研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2019.
[6] Leonilde, R., et al. (2017) Individual Trait Variation in Phytoplankton Communities across Multiple Spatial Scales. Journal of Plankton Research, 39, 577-588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Xiao, L.J., Wang, T., Hu, R., Han, B.P., Wang, S., Qian, X. and Padisak, J. (2011) Succession of Phytoplankton Functional Groups Regulated by Monsoonal Hydrology in a Large Canyon-Shaped Reservoir. Water Research, 45, 5099-5109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Shannon, C.E. and Weiner, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
[9] Ludwing, J.A. and Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[10] Pianka, E.R. (1971) Ecology of the Agamid Lizard Amphibolurus isolepis in Western Australia. Copeia, 1971, 527-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 陈倩颖, 吴利. 巢湖浮游动物功能群和浮游植物的相互关系[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(4): 42-50.
[12] 郭沛涌, 林育真, 李玉仙. 东平湖浮游植物与水质评价[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 1997(4): 37-42.