居住权与民事执行权的衡平问题研究
Study on the Equalization of Residence Right and Civil Execution Right
摘要: 居住权制度是民法典的一大亮点,也为不动产民事执行增加了难度。文章运用类型化分析手段,发现实践中不同法院对居住权能否排除执行的态度存有分歧,居住权与民事执行权统一衡平规则的缺位是造成这种实践困惑的直接原因。通过对设居不动产民事执行所涉及主体之间的利益进行衡量分析,可对债权种类、居住权类型和是否满足权利形式要件三要素进行组合,对居住权与民事执行权进行位次排序,为执行法院处理设居不动产的执行工作提供统一衡平规则。
Abstract: The residence right system is a bright spot of the civil code, which also increases the difficulty of the civil execution of real estate. By using the method of categorization analysis, this paper finds that different courts have different attitudes on whether the right of habitation can be excluded from execution, and the absence of uniform equalization rules for the right of habitation and civil execu-tion is the direct cause of this confusion in practice. Through the measure analysis of the interests between civil execution subjects involved in set based on the real estate, it can combine the types of creditor’s right, types of residence right and whether it meets the requirements of the form of right, and rank residence right and civil execution right, so as to provide unified equity rules for the exe-cution of the court’s handling of the immovable property.
文章引用:王静. 居住权与民事执行权的衡平问题研究[J]. 法学, 2022, 10(1): 78-84. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2022.101011

参考文献

[1] 肖建国, 庄诗岳. 论案外人异议之诉中足以排除强制执行的民事权益——以虚假登记财产的执行为中心[J]. 法律适用, 2018(15): 11-22.
[2] 赵秀举. 论民事执行救济兼论第三人异议之诉的悖论与困境[J]. 中外法学, 2012(4): 835-853.
[3] 张卫平. 执行救济制度的体系化[J]. 中外法学, 2019(4): 891-910.
[4] 顾乐永. 对不动产的强制执行——以所有权瑕疵为问题[J]. 人民司法, 2017(28): 105-109.
[5] 卢正敏. 论强制拍卖抵押物时租赁权的除去[J]. 政法学刊, 2016(4): 54-64.
[6] 姚辉, 阙梓冰. 不动产隐名权利的私法保护——以案外人执行异议之诉为视角[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2021(2): 125-134.