科普短视频中的互动元话语研究
A Research on Interactional Metadiscourse in Science Short Videos
摘要: 科普短视频是一种正在快速发展的新兴科普形式。相关研究多集中在创作、传播、翻译等角度。其中有不少学者关注到科普短视频作者与观众紧密的互动关系,但有关内容缺乏语言学角度的解读和支撑。因此本文聚焦科普短视频中的互动元话语,对作者使用语言资源与观众互动的情况进行深入探讨。互动元话语是作者评价和介入命题信息的手段,包含立场特征和介入特征两个范畴,其中又包括模糊语、增强语、态度标记、自我提及、读者指示词、指令语和疑问句7个子类别。经过统计分析,本文揭示了互动元话语在科普短视频中的重要作用。合理使用互动元话语可以帮助作者与观众建立亲近、友好的互动关系,同时展现出客观、严谨的科学态度。
Abstract: Short video is a newly developed way of popularizing science. Relevant studies mainly focus on creation, communication and translation of science short videos. Among these studies, many scholars have noticed the frequent interaction between the author and the audience, but there remains a lack of evidence in the perspective of linguistics. Therefore, this paper focuses on the interactional metadiscourse in science short videos, trying to investigate the author’s use of lan-guage resources to interact with the audience. Interactional metadiscourse is a means for the author to evaluate and intervene in propositional information. It includes two categories: stance features and engagement features. The two categories can be further divided into seven subcategories: hedges, boosters, attitude markers, self-mentions, reader pronouns, directives and questions. Through statistical analysis, this paper reveals the significance of interactional metadiscourse in science short videos. It helps the author establish a close and friendly relationship with the audience, at the same time showing the rigor and objectivity of science.
文章引用:侯颖. 科普短视频中的互动元话语研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2022, 10(1): 75-81. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2022.101010

参考文献

[1] 王艳丽, 钟琦, 张卓, 王福兴. 科普短视频对知识传播的影响[J]. 科技传播, 2020, 12(21): 1-6.
[2] 郝倩倩. 科普视频在“抖音”短视频平台的传播[J]. 科普研究, 2019, 14(3): 75-81.
[3] 徐萌. 疫情语境下医学科普短视频大众化传播策略创新——以“丁香医生”抖音号为例[J]. 传媒, 2020(18): 38-40.
[4] 金心怡, 王国燕. 抖音热门科普短视频的传播力探析[J]. 科普研究, 2021, 16(1): 15-23.
[5] Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004) Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25, 156-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Fu, X.L. (2012) The Use of Interactional Metadiscourse in Job Postings. Discourse Studies, 14, 399-417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 贾雪玲. 科普文中的立场特征分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2020, 8(6): 827-833.
[8] 秦枫, 陈坚林. 人际意义的创建与维系——研究生英语科技论文的互动问题研究[J]. 外语教学, 2013, 34(4): 56-60.
[9] Chen, X.R. (2020) Metadiscourse: Critical Pragmatic Studies on Chinese Public Discourse. Routledge, New York. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈新仁. 广告用语的个人化趋向: 一项历时研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2013(3): 26-32.
[11] Hyland, K. (2005) Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 吕叔湘. 现代汉语八百词(增订本) [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1999.
[13] Hyland, K. (2001) Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Writing. Written Communication, 18, 549-574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Fu, X.L. and Hyland, K. (2014) Interaction in Two Journalistic Genres: A Study of Interactional Metadiscourse. English Text Construction, 7, 122-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 雷璇. 科普语篇与科学语篇的文体关系——以霍金有关“黑洞”的两个文本为例[J]. 外语教学, 2020, 41(6): 54-59.
[16] Hyland, K. (2002) Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 23, 215-239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 张恒君. 现代汉语祈使句人际功能研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2014.
[18] 刘建桢. 新媒体语境下科普话语亲和力建构研究[J]. 科普研究, 2020, 15(4): 47-54.