由Halliburton vs. Chubb一案引发的关于仲裁员披露义务标准的思考

The Halliburton vs. Chubb Case Reflections on the Standard of Disclosure Obligations of Arbitrators

摘要: 国际上关于仲裁员披露义务的标准主要有主观说、客观说，各国在制定仲裁法时考量到仲裁的契约性及自治性，尽可能地以引导性、宽泛性的言语加以规制，由此引发实务中对于仲裁员披露义务之具体披露事项/情况的争议。本文拟从发生于英国的Halliburton vs. Chubb一案引发国际社会关于仲裁员披露义务内容的广泛争执入手，思考探讨我国仲裁实务中关于仲裁员披露义务的标准衡量问题。

Abstract: The international standard on the disclosure obligation of arbitrators is mainly subjective and objective, and countries, taking into account the contractual and autonomous nature of arbitration, have tried to regulate it in guiding and broad terms as far as possible, which has led to controversies on the specific disclosure matters/circumstances of the disclosure obligation of arbitrators in practice. In this article, we will consider the issue of the standard measurement of the arbitrator’s disclosure obligation in China’s arbitration practice, starting from the Halliburton vs. Chubb case in the United Kingdom, which led to an extensive international debate on the content of the arbitrator’s disclosure obligation.