单纯间断缝合和水平褥式缝合对下颌阻生智齿拔除术后并发症的影响
Comparative Study of Effect of Simple Interrupted Suturing and Horizontal Mattress Suturing on Postoperative Complications after Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
摘要: 目的:比较单纯间断缝合和水平褥式缝合对下颌阻生齿拔除术后并发症的影响。方法:筛选自2019.10~2020.10于我院口腔颌面外科就诊的要求拔除下颌双侧对称阻生齿的并符合标准的患者作为研究对象,采用随机、自身对照设计,使用相同的翻瓣微创拔牙方法间隔1月拔除左右下颌阻生齿,一侧采用单纯间断缝合,另一侧采用水平褥式缝合。术前记录患者的面部肿胀度与张口度,术后记录手术时间,并于术后第2、7天记录患者的面部肿胀度、张口度与疼痛评分。使用Kolmogorov–Smirnov检验、t检验以及曼–惠特尼检验对数据进行统计分析。结果:本次研究共纳入患者20人,其中男性9人,女性11人,平均年龄24.25 ± 3.87岁。所有患者均顺利完整拔除下颌阻生智齿,无干槽症出现。单纯间断缝合的手术时间明显少于水平褥式缝合(P < 0.05)。术后第2天、术后第7天的肿胀程度、张口受限程度、疼痛评分在两组间无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。结论:基于本研究,单纯间断缝合相较水平褥式缝合明显缩短临床手术时间,临床建议使用。
Abstract: Objective: The aim of this clinical study was to compare the influence of simple interrupted suturing and horizontal mattress suturing on postoperative complications after surgical extractions of impacted mandibular third molars. Methods: Patients who met the criteria complaining the bilateral symmetry impacted mandibular third molars from October 2019 to October 2020 in our hospital were selected. In this randomized and self-controlled study, same surgical extractions of right and left impacted mandibular third molars were performed in 2 sessions at a 1-month interval in all patients. After the extractions, the surgical flaps were sutured with either the simple interrupted or horizontal mattress suturing technique. Time of the surgical procedures was collected. Swelling, trismus, and pain were evaluated on postoperative days 2, and 7. Statistical evaluation of data was made using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, t test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Result: A total of 20 subjects participated in the present study comprising 11 females and 9 males with a mean age of 24.25 ± 3.87 years. Impacted mandibular third molars were successfully and completely extracted in all patients with no dry socket. The average time of the surgical procedures was 27.95 ± 6.23 minutes for the simple interrupted suturing group which was less than 33.30 ± 6.69 minutes for the horizontal mattress suturing group (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the 2 groups in the swelling, trismus, and pain at postoperative days 2, and 7. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, simple interrupted suturing technique is more effective than the horizontal mattress suturing technique on decreasing times of surgical procedure which is suggested in clinical application.
文章引用:施锡辉. 单纯间断缝合和水平褥式缝合对下颌阻生智齿拔除术后并发症的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(1): 530-536. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.121078

参考文献

[1] Camargo, I.B., Sobrinho, J.B., et al. (2016) Correlational Study of Impacted and Non-Functional Lower Third Molar Position with Occurrence of Pathologies. Progress in Orthodontics, 17, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Grover, P.S. and Lorton, L. (1985) The Incidence of Unerupted Permanent Teeth and Related Clinical Cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology, 59, 420-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Santosh, P. (2015) Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Combined Clinical and Radiological Classification. Annals of Medical & Health Sciences Research, 5, 229-234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Capelli Jr., J. (1991) Mandibular Growth and Third Molar Impaction in Extraction Cases. The Angle Orthodontist, 61, 223-229.
[5] Juodzbalys, G. and Daugela, P. (2013) Mandibular Third Molar Impaction: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Classification. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research, 4, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kim, T.W., Artun, J., Behbehani, F. and Artese, F. (2003) Prevalence of Third Molar Impaction in Orthodontic Patients Treated Nonextraction and with Extraction of 4 Premolars. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 123, 138-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] de Santana, S.T., Calazans, A.C., Martins-Filho, P.R., et al. (2011) Evaluation of the Muscle Relaxant Cyclobenzaprine after Third-Molar Extraction. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 142, 1154-1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Lima, C.J., Silva, L.C., Melo, M.R., Santos, J.A. and Santos, T.S. (2012) Evaluation of the Agreement by Examiners According to Classifications of Third Molars. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral, Cirugia Bucal, 17, e281-e286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 陈芳川, 陈雅瑜, 关比扬, 等. 两种方法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙效果分析[J]. 中外医疗, 2017, 36(14): 82-84.
[10] 康非吾, 薛中秀. 下颌第三磨牙截冠留根法的临床研究进展[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2014, 24(3): 165-169.
[11] Lee, C.T., Zhang, S., Leung, Y.Y., et al. (2015) Patients’ Satisfaction and Prevalence of Complications on Surgical Extraction of Third Molar. Patient Preference & Adherence, 9, 257-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kugelberg, C.F., Ahlstrom, U., Ericson, S. and Hugoson, A. (1985) Periodontal Healing after Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery. A Retrospective Study. International Journal of Oral Surgery, 14, 29-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 乔峰, 隋磊, 张健. 龈瓣缝合类型对下颌阻生智齿拔除术后生活质量的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2015, 43(9): 1000-1002.
[14] Acar, A.H., Erdem, N.F., et al. (2017) Is Horizontal Mattress Suturing More Effective than Simple Interrupted Suturing on Postoperative Complications and Primary Wound Healing after Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 28, e657-e661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Alkadi, S. and Stassen, L. (2018) The Effect of One-Suture and Suture-Less Techniques on Post-Operative Healing Following Third Molar Surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 77, 703.e1-703.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 陈秀兰. 临床应用微创拔牙术后拔牙创愈合的研究[J]. 湖北科技学院学报(医学版), 2018, 32(5): 24-26.
[17] 董芳. 下颌高位阻生智齿拔牙牙创应用缝合和不缝合的影响观察[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2015(7): 64.
[18] Kumar, P.P. and Manjula, S. (2018) Comparative Study of Primary And Secondary Closure of the Surgical Wound after Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 22, 261-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Ricard, A.S., Nau, O., Veyret, A., et al. (2015) Comparison between Closure and Absence of Closure after Removal of Fully Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Prospective Randomized Study. Revue de stomatologie, de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et de chirurgie orale, 116, 12-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Hashemi, H.M., Beshkar, M. and Aghajani, R. (2012) The Effect of Sutureless Wound Closure on Postoperative Pain and Swelling after Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 50, 256-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Osunde, O.D., Saheeb, B.D. and Adebola, R.A. (2012) Comparative Study of Effect of Single and Multiple Suture Techniques on Inflammatory Complications after Third Molar Surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41, 1275-1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Gay-Escoda, C., Gomez-Santos, L., Sanchez-Torres, A., et al. (2015) Effect of the Suture Technique on Postoperative Pain, Swelling and Trismus after Removal of Lower Third Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 20, e372-e377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 朱越广, 钟志海, 常少海. 下颌阻生智齿拔除的缝合方式对邻牙远中牙周组织的影响[J]. 吉林医学, 2014(17): 3765-3766.
[24] 陈培申, 朱桂钱, 伦志龙, 等. 锚式缝合在下颌阻生智齿拔除术中的应用[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2015(20): 2801-2802.
[25] Cetinkaya, B.O., Sumer, M., Tutkun, F., et al. (2009) Influence of Different Suturing Techniques on Periodontal Health of the Adjacent Second Molars after Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 108, 156-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]