二语写作中iWrite机评反馈和教师反馈的对比研究
A Comparative Research on iWrite Machine Evaluation and Teacher’s Feedback on Second Language Writing
摘要: 本文基于中国大连某大学大一学生写作现状，参照教育部发布的《大学英语课程要求》对大学生的培养要求，以社会文化理论为支撑，分别对两个实验班的学生进行iWrite英语写作教学与评阅系统的机评反馈和教师反馈，探究这两种反馈对学生的英语写作能力是否有影响。结果显示两种反馈都会帮助学生提高英语写作能力，也证实了未来iWrite这一系统可能会代替教师更高效地对学生的写作文本进行修正反馈。
Abstract: Based on the English writing status of freshmen in a university in Dalian, China and under the guidance of cultivation requirements published by College English Curriculum Requirements (Trial), this article, supported by sociocultural theory, will conclude whether students’ English writing proficiency has been improved after they received feedback from iWrite English writing and evaluation system and the teacher separately. The results show that both types of feedback will help students improve their English writing proficiency. It also provides evidence to infer that it is possible that iWrite evaluation system will replace teacher’s feedback in the future.
文章引用：于洲, 时真妹. 二语写作中iWrite机评反馈和教师反馈的对比研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2022, 10(2): 214-223. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2022.102039

参考文献

[1] 教育部高等教育司. 大学英语课程教学要求[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2007: 5.
[2] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
[3] 郗佼. 社会文化理论与二语习得研究——理论、方法与实践[J]. 外语界, 2020(2): 90-96.
[4] 王菲. 大学英语作文自动评分系统(AES)的实证研究[J]. 科教文汇(中旬刊), 2014(11): 99-100.
[5] 李艳玲, 田夏春. iWrite2.0在线英语作文评分信度研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2018, 28(2): 75-80.
[6] Cohen, A.D. and Cavalcanti, M.C. (1990) Feedback on Compositions: Teacher and Student Verbal Reports. In: Kroll, B., Ed., Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 155-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Truscott, J. (2004) Evidence and Conjecture on the Effects of Correction: A Response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Al Ajmi, A.A.S. (2015) The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Omani Students’ Accuracy in the Use of English Prepositions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6, 61-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Chandler, J. (2003) The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Ferris, D.R. (2002) Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
[11] Chen, S.B., Nassaji, H. and Liu, Q. (2016) EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Preferences of Written Corrective Feedback: A Case Study of University Students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1, Article No. 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Kisnanto, Y.P. (2016) The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Higher Education Students’ Writing Accuracy. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 16, 121-131.
[13] Bitchener, J. (2008) Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Ghufron, M.A. (2019) Exploring an Automated Feedback Program ‘Grammarly’ and Teacher Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing Assessment: Modern vs. Traditional Assessment. Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, Semarang, 27 April 2019, 30.
[15] 姚晓博. 教师书面纠正性反馈对高中生英语写作语言准确性的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2018.
[16] 王林艳. 直接与间接纠正性反馈对学习者英语写作水平和自主性的影响[J]. 昭通学院学报, 2019, 41(5): 88-93.
[17] 杜娟. 直接书面反馈和间接书面反馈对中国学生英语写作准确性的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2017.
[18] 唐锦兰, 吴一安. 写作自动评价系统在大学英语教学中的应用研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2012(4): 53-59.
[19] 韩宁. 几个英语作文自动评分系统的原理与评述[J]. 中国考试(研究版), 2009(3): 38-44.
[20] 黄勇. 英语写作自动评改功能探究[J]. 信息技术与信息化, 2014(4): 314-318.
[21] 王金铨, 文秋芳. 国内外机器自动评分系统评述——兼论对中国学生翻译自动评分系统的启示[J]. 外语界, 2010(1): 75-81+91.
[22] 白丽芳. 国内外作文自动批改系统效度研究概述[J]. 教育现代化, 2017, 4(40): 191-193.
[23] 沈志法. 基于自动作文评分系统的英语写作教学模式研究[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报, 2011(4): 7-11+19.
[24] 孙昌华. 在线写作自动评价系统的影响:大连的个案(英文) [J]. 中国应用语言学(英文), 2012, 35(1): 63-79+129.
[25] 刘鎏, 张萍. 自动作文评分对高职英语写作教学的影响研究[J]. 南京工业职业技术学院学报, 2017, 17(2): 48-52+64.

为你推荐